back to rat haus | Index | Search | tree
Editor’s Note: send recommendations for additional sources.
Pandemic Parallax View
parallax [par-uh-laks] noun: the apparent displacement
of an observed object due to a change in the position of the observer

Gall-Peters Projection of Mother Earth
A striking feature of our culture includes the specific set of illusions presented by commercial print and broadcast media which promote a representation of reality through omission, distortion, lack of contextual analysis, and disinforming opinion stated as obvious, incontestable fact. It is always our choice what lens we adopt to view the world and our place in it.
David Ratcliffe, 23 Sep 2015
Lockdown only pushes the severe cases
into the future – it will not prevent them
Contents
Lawsuits Challenging Covid-19 False Claims
Pandemic Parallax View Channel
Recommended Highlights
Critical Analysis by Dr Ariane Bilheran
Author: Ariane Bilheran, a graduate of the Ecole Normale Supérieure (Ulm),
philosopher, clinical psychologist, and doctor of psychopathology,
specializes in the study of manipulation, paranoia,
perversion, harassment and totalitarianism.
English editions provided by The Translation Bridge:
A Bridge Between America and Europe to Live Together More Intelligently
‘People in power lie’, my father once told me.... [T]he more enduring tragedy, arguably, is that we cannot trust our news media to tell us the truth about vital health issues when advertising dollars are at stake. You scratch your head and wonder how all those Trump supporters don’t share your indignation at President Trump’s mendacity. One answer is that they are disheartened by once-trusted media outlets who have also set the precedent of routinely lying and violating the public trust, wounding in the process our democracy, public faith in critical institutions, and the health of our children.”
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., “Flu Misinformation and Coronavirus Fears: My Letter to Dr. Sanjay Gupta,” Children’s Health Defense, 16 Apr 2020
“That [Feb 2020] letter [to the Lancet] was ostensibly to show solidarity with the workers in Wuhan, but it also had a phrase denouncing the conspiracy theories as to the non-natural origin of the pandemic. And again, it was an attempt to shut down debate. To me, that’s totally antithetical to the scientific process. The scientific process should welcome scrutiny and debate on serious questions like this, and then you have a hypothesis, and you break the hypothesis, and you produce evidence and reasonable argument. They attempted to short-circuit all of that by saying, ‘This is conspiracy stuff’.”
Sam Husseini, Episode 7: Perspectives on the Pandemic, 7 May 2020
Living is easy with eyes closed
Misunderstanding all you see
It’s getting hard to be someone
But it all works out
John Lennon             
Strawberry Fields Forever
                                                                     

Pictures from a 13 Jun demonstration against
forced COVID-19 vaccinations in New York
Written Works              Films / Recordings
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2011
2005

Films / Recordings              Written Works
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015 and earlier

12 Dec 2018: Bill Gates heads to a workshop on global health at the NIH with (left) National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci and NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins (right).
“Grow some balls”: A open letter to our kept intelligentsia
The situation is dire. I have lived though the ending of the Soviet Union, and I am telling you, what we are dealing with right now is worse, much worse—and no, it is not because of Donald Trump or the virus. The issue is much deeper. We have gotten too complacent, too zealous, too anxiously dependent on being in sync with our echo chamber—the latter being shamelessly manipulated by moneyed interests. What happened to free-form thinking beyond a google search or a conformist New York Times editorial? It is so hard for an educated American to accept the fact that our entire establishment—the left, the right, and the seemingly radical—is corrupt, egotistical, and unreliable, and that we have somehow turned into a dark cartoon about unsatisfied, underloved, gullible children?
Our imaginary ideal of Law and Order has been long sold to the rats. We are in a free fall of all-encompassing corruption that has permeated all areas of social function, including politics, media, and even science. We are a complacent empire in deep trouble, and our fear of genuine, unbranded dissent makes us complicit. If we continue pretending that the voice of the establishment is the voice of reason, we will go down in history as sorry clowns—just like the pompous Soviet functionaries did.
As it stands now, our state-aligned media has outperformed Pravda at absurdity and lack of coherence (outrageously so when it comes to the pandemic), our corporations are colluding with the state at a warp speed to suck the life out of us in the most profitable way, and the abuse of language has gotten unbearable. As a human being who is thirsty for truth, I can no longer tolerate it. It is as if we fell asleep and woke up inside a slogan generating vortex that consumes our souls and spits out syntactically perfect but otherwise meaningless sentences constructed from words like “progress,” “pandemic,” “public safety,” “social distancing,” “stay home,” and “privilege.”...
Betrayal by the establishment is something I have been thinking about for years, as a result of having lived in the post-soviet space and observing the sadness of the perceived irrelevance that the generation of my grandparents experienced when the Soviet Union fell. They lived their lives bravely, they suffered a lot, they defeated Hitler—and then suddenly, in their old age, they became ideologically irrelevant and helpless in the face of medical cruelty and indifference of the machine. Is history repeating itself?
Contents
Conscience and The Nuremberg Code
Informed Consent, Censorship, and Inalienable Rights, Oct 2021
Apprehending the False Promise of Biosecurity
Unmasking Usurpation by Fear Merchants, Nov 2020
Pandemic Parallax View Channel
Critical Analysis by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Recommended Highlights
Doctors Speaking Out On What They Know
Interviews
Films / Recordings
Alternatives to Experimental Immunization
Critical Analysis
Efficacy of Ivermectin, HCQ, and Other Repurposed Drugs
Resistance ≠ Futile
Evolving Situation
Vaccine Effects
PPV Daily Summaries
(Jun-Aug 2020)
Last Updated: 3 Dec 2021
Lawsuits Challenging Covid-19 False Claims

Lawsuits are being initiated and filed to challenge the claim Covid-19 justifies locking down global society and injecting 7+ billion human beings with experimental biologics. The purpose here is to summarize and reference well-conceived challenges being mounted within judicial proceedings concerning the veracity of Covid-19 claims justifying the unprecedented global medical experiment being conducted by public health and elected officials.

From Conscience and The Nuremberg Code, last updated: 30 Nov 2021:
Recommended Highlights
Doctors Speaking Out
On What They Know
Off Guardian:
24 March: 12 Experts Questioning Coronavirus Panic
28 March: 10 MORE Experts Criticizing Coronavirus Panic
17 April: 8 MORE Experts Questioning Coronavirus Panic
COVID-19, How can I cure thee? Let me count the ways.
Thomas E. Levy, MD, JD, Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, 18 July 2020
Presentation in Madrid, 25 July 2020
Joaquín Murrieta, El Correo de España, 1 Aug 2020
expanding compilation on
Efficacy of Ivermectin, HCQ, and Other Repurposed Drugs
Washington, D.C., 27 July 2020
Introduction:
Dr. Stella Immanuel, primary care physician, Houston, TX excerpt:
Speaking The Truth About HCQ and COVID
(5:33)
ACU-Conference 2, 31 Jul 2020
(Deutsch, Englisch, Spanisch, Ungarisch Portugiesisch)
[13:50]
We have this international perspective and we have a great chance with this Second International Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee. Please stay tuned. All my colleagues will have a lot of statements. With more time we will translate this on our website, https://acu2020.org. We translated it so far in eight languages and we invite you all to come together to support this movement for health for freedom and for justice. Because we see that we have no killer virus all over the world and it’s a good message. But on the other side we see it looks like there are highly criminal people who do this and they do this with no evidence. In this book our colleague, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi from Germany, with his colleague, Dr. Karina Reiss, they published all the facts, all the scientific and medical facts, in this book. It’s called Corona Fehlalarm?. [Corona False Alarm? (Eng review)] It will be published in english soon and hopefully in other languages because we together we stand here, we sit here, and we are with you. We raise the red flag to the criminals and we will investigate this. So please stay tuned and support us. Thank you very much.
ACU-Conference 1, 2 Jul 2020
Translations presented in 10 languages
English translation excerpt:
Welcome to the ACU, the Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee. If Parliament does not do it, we, the citizens, are called upon to do it ourselves.

As the Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, we will investigate why these restrictive measures were imposed upon us in our country as part of CoVid-19, why people are suffering now and whether there is proportionality of the measures to this disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We have serious doubts that these measures are proportionate. This needs to be examined, and since the parliaments—neither the opposition parties nor the ruling parties—have not convened a committee and it is not even planned, it is high time that we took this into our own hands. We will invite and hear experts here in the Corona speaker group. These are experts from all areas of life: medicine, social affairs, law, economics and many more.

Well-known experts have already agreed to be part of it. In addition to the speaker group, my colleague Prof. HADITSCH and my colleague Dr. SCHIFFMANN, I would also like to introduce myself. My name is Heiko SCHÖNING, I’m an ordinary doctor from Hamburg. My personal motivation is that I am a father, like many others in this country who have children. And we see that our children are suffering now, not just because the playgrounds have been closed, but because they are separated. And it’s worse for the adults.

We ask ourselves: Why are people no longer allowed to visit their parents in retirement homes? Is there such a great risk of infection? Do we really have a killer virus here? Do we have rabies or do we have the plague? We have serious doubts that this is the case! We do not have the plague! What really helps us in this context is decency and honesty, as the famous Nobel Prize winner Albert CAMUS already expressed in his wonderful book "The Plague". We want to make sure that the ACU, the Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, is based on honesty and transparency.

This is why experts—such as Prof. BHAKDI from medicine, Prof. OTTE from business, or legal expert Prof. JUNGBLUT, and many, many others who have already agreed—will get together in this committee. And of course, we also invite all experts from the government, the public institutes, the Robert Koch Institute, and certainly international experts as well. We will guarantee transparency. All expert statements will be broadcast live, without editing, you can watch it all on the Internet. We are going to set up a website, and of course we will need more resources for that. Therefore, please support this citizens’ request, this ACU citizens’ initiative.

What will be the ideal outcome? We will see that we do not have to be more afraid than the last few years with normal flu waves, because this is exactly how this one seems to be. Then why were these drastic measures taken? ...

Jean-François Toussaint, Professor of Physiology,
University of Paris, 10 Aug 2020
On August 10, Jean-François Toussaint, Professor of Physiology at the University of Paris was the guest on the popular French program “Les Grandes Gueules” on RMC. Toussaint previously served as President of the Estates General of Prevention and member of the High Council for Public Health.

Asked about the current health crisis resulting from contamination by the Chinese virus at the start of the school year, Professor Toussaint explained that the protective measures are divorced from any scientific rationale. On French national television he warned, that as the crisis continues, the response becomes “increasingly less and less scientific and increasingly irrational”.

Professor Toussaint believes that young people are the scapegoats in this pandemic. “In phases of major tension, the way we are going to operate irrationally is to designate the goat. Who is the goat now? Youth.”

As reported by Epoch Times, the professor denounces the wearing of corona masks and the government’s push to blame children for a potential “second wave”:

“it’s just social mimicry, that’s just that, we have absolutely no demonstration of any scientific interest and currently we say: it is the youth who make themselves” responsible “for the second wave ”. But no, that’s a ‘collective suicide’ generated by the Scientific Council, to collapse an economy whose young people will pay the most important price in the years to come.”

And from this recording: “The decisions that have been taken, these side effects this second half of the time that we will have, if we manage to blow the whistle at the end of the first half, so if the second half comes, it will be essentially social, economic and health-related, because today’s economy is tomorrow’s prevention and tomorrow’s health.

We have just shown that more than sixty thousand children in the world have already died from the effects of general confinement. From blind confinement, that has not allowed them to have the necessary nutrition, to have the food intake that allows them to survive.

In all the countries that have blindly confined people, it is clear that in all of these countries there is no relationship between the intensity of the confinement and the motivation behind it.

Lockdown Lunacy release 1.0 / release 2.0 / release 3.0
LOCKDOWN LUNACY - the thinking person’s guide
to an imaginary war

J.B. Handley, j.b. handley blog, 30 May 2020
For anyone willing to look, there are so many facts that tell the true story, and it goes something like this:
Knowing what we know today about COVID-19’s Infection Fatality Rate, asymmetric impact by age and medical condition, non-transmissibility by asymptomatic people and in outdoor settings, near-zero fatality rate for children, and the basic understanding of viruses through Farr’s law, locking down society was a bone-headed policy decision so devastating to society that historians may judge it as the all-time worst decision ever made. Worse, as these clear facts have become available, many policy-makers haven’t shifted their positions, despite the fact that every hour under any stage of lockdown has a domino-effect of devastation to society. Meanwhile, the media—with a few notable exceptions—is oddly silent on all the good news. Luckily, an unexpected group of heroes across the political landscape—many of them doctors and scientists—have emerged to tell the truth, despite facing extreme criticism and censorship from an angry mob desperate to continue fighting an imaginary war.
My goal is to engage in known facts. You, the reader, can decide if all of these facts, when you put them together, equate to the story above.
  • Fact #1: The Infection Fatality Rate for COVID-19 is somewhere between 0.07-0.20%, in line with seasonal flu
  • Fact #2: The risk of dying from COVID-19 is much higher than the average IFR for older people and those with co-morbidities, and much lower than the average IFR for younger healthy people, and nearing zero for children
  • Fact #3: People infected with COVID-19 who are asymptomatic (which is most people) do NOT spread COVID-19
  • Fact #4: Emerging science shows no spread of COVID-19 in the community (shopping, restaurants, barbers, etc.)
  • Fact #5: Published science shows COVID-19 is NOT spread outdoors
  • Fact #6: Science shows masks are ineffective to halt the spread of COVID-19, and The WHO recommends they should only be worn by healthy people if treating or living with someone with a COVID-19 infection
  • Fact #7: There’s no science to support the magic of a six-foot barrier
  • Fact #8: The idea of locking down an entire society had never been done and has no supportable science, only theoretical modeling
  • Fact #9: The epidemic models of COVID-19 have been disastrously wrong, and both the people and the practice of modeling has a terrible history
  • Fact #10: The data shows that lockdowns have NOT had an impact on the course of the disease.
  • Fact #11: Florida locked down late, opened early, and is doing fine, despite predictions of doom
  • Fact #12: New York’s above average death rate appears to be driven by a fatal policy error combined with aggressive intubations.
  • Fact #13: Public health officials and disease epidemiologists do NOT consider the other negative societal consequences of lockdowns
  • Fact #14: There is a predictive model for the viral arc of COVID-19, it’s called Farr’s Law, and it was discovered over 100 years ago
  • Fact #15: The lockdowns will cause more death and destruction than COVID-19 ever did
  • Fact #16: All these phased re-openings are utter nonsense with no science to support them, but they will all be declared a success

LOCKDOWN LUNACY 2.0: Second Wave? Not even close.
J.B. Handley, j.b. handley blog, 29 Jun 2020
Why did politicians ever lockdown society in the first place? Can we all agree that the stated purpose was to “flatten the curve” so our hospital system could handle the inevitable COVID-19 patients who needed care? At that point, at least, back in early March, people were behaving rationally. They accepted that you can’t eradicate a virus, so let’s postpone things enough to handle it. The fact is, we have done that, and so much more. The headlines are filled with dire warnings of a “second wave” and trigger-happy Governors are rolling back regulations to try to stem the tide of new cases. But, is any of it actually true and should we all be worried? No, it’s not a second wave. The COVID-19 virus is on its final legs, and while I have filled this post with graphs to prove everything I just said, this is really the only graph you need to see, it’s the CDC’s data, over time, of deaths from COVID-19 here in the U.S., and the trend line is unmistakable:
If virologists were driving policy about COVID-19 rather than public health officials, we’d all be Sweden right now, which means life would effectively be back to normal. The only thing our lockdowns have done at this point is prolong the agony a little bit, and encouraged Governors to make up more useless rules. Sweden’s health minister understood that the only chance to beat COVID-19 was to get the Swedish population to a Herd Immunity Threshold against COVID-19, and that’s exactly what they have done, so let me start there.

LOCKDOWN LUNACY 3.0: It’s over
J.B. Handley, j.b. handley blog, 27 Jul 2020
If you’re hoping the COVID-19 pandemic will go on forever, this post may disappoint you. And, I get it. We have gone frothing-at-the-mouth nuts over a slightly above-normal virulence virus, with a unique and obvious age-distribution pattern that should have made containment easy and panic completely unnecessary. And, if you’re living in the United States, like I am, you probably think my declaration that this pandemic is “over” to be somewhere between wishful thinking and incredibly premature, and I hear you, too, although forgive me if I’m not sure you’re the one thinking clearly, given some of the things I’ve recently read. I promise to support my assertion with data, and the wisdom of people far more expert than me who are having a harder time being heard in the present climate of...bats#@t crazy.

Have we lost our collective minds? Yes.

You may not be one of them. In fact, I’m guessing the people who actually take the time to read my blog posts are the few remaining who haven’t been subsumed by the panic, but can we agree that most have? Jeffrey A. Tucker of the American Institute for Economic Research put it best in his excellent essay on July 10 titled, When will the Madness End?:

“I’m a practicing psychiatrist who specializes in anxiety disorders, paranoid delusions, and irrational fear. I’ve been treating this in individuals as a specialist. It’s hard enough to contain these problems in normal times. What’s happening now is a spread of this serious medical condition to the whole population. It can happen with anything but here we see a primal fear of disease turning into mass panic. It seems almost deliberate. It is tragic. Once this starts, it could take years to repair the psychological damage.”

I’m 50 years old, and I’ve noticed that younger people seem particularly scared of COVID-19, they are the ones I typically see biking and hiking with masks on...

Daniel Horowitz wrote a great article about this survey titled, New study: Millennials think their risk from COVID-19 is exponentially more than the true threat. He writes:

Perhaps the most destructive element of lockdown is the panic and fear that such severe measures help confirm, in this case, wrongly so, in the minds of the young and impressionable. As the paper concludes, “Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted.” In other words, we need to flatten the fear.
I thought that survey was bad enough, but a different survey by Kekst CNC asking different questions revealed a simply astonishing figure: Americans over-estimated the TOTAL number of compatriots who have died from COVID-19 by 200-fold! When asked the question (in mid-July), “How many people in your country have died from the Coronavirus?”, Americans responded “9%,” which would be roughly 30,000,000 people, versus the actual number of 151,000. No wonder people are panicked (and wildly, wildly misinformed.)

Swiss Propaganda Research
Facts about Covid-19
Regular Updates on Medical and Political Developments
Fully referenced facts about Covid-19, provided by experts in the field,
to help our readers make a realistic risk assessment.
“The only means to fight the plague is honesty.”
—Albert Camus, The Plague (1947)
   INTERVIEWS    
Interviews Contents
Perspectives on the Pandemic
The Press & The Public Project
  • Episode 23: 2020: A Propaganda Masterpiece - Prof. Mark Crispin Miller, Part Three - The Coup of '63 to Covid
  • Episode 22: “Injections & Injunctions” Part 2/2—Scientific, Technological Elite - A Conversation with Dr. Robert Malone
  • Episode 21: “Injections & Injunctions” Part 1/2—Paradox - A Conversation with Dr. Robert Malone
  • Episode 20: “This Interview Could Save Your Life” Part Two: The Dangers of the Injections - Dr. Peter McCullough
  • Episode 19: “This Interview Could Save Your Life” Part One: Early Treatment - Dr. Peter McCullough
  • Episode 18: 2020: A Propaganda Masterpiece - Prof. Mark Crispin Miller, Part Two - Divide & Conquer
  • Episode 17: 2020: A Propaganda Masterpiece - Prof. Mark Crispin Miller, Part One
  • Episode 16: An Urgent Warning To The World - Dr. Mike Yeadon, former Vice President and Chief Science Officer at Pfizer
  • Episode 15: A Conversation with Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D. - Blood Clots and Beyond
  • Episode 14: Catching Up With Knut Wittkowski, PhD
  • Episode 13: A Conversation with Leemon McHenry, PhD - The Illusion of Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Episode 12: A Conversation with Dr. Judy Mikovits and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Pt 3 of 3)
  • Episode 11: A Conversation with Dr. Judy Mikovits and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Pt 2 of 3)
  • Episode 10: A Conversation with Dr. Judy Mikovits and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Pt 1 of 3)
  • Episode 9: The (Undercover) Epicenter Nurse
  • Episode 8: The Monopoly Edition with author Matt Stoller
  • Episode 7: A Conversation with Investigative Journalist Sam Husseini
  • Episode 6: A Conversation with Dr. Dan Erickson & Dr. Artin Massihi
  • Episode 5: A Conversation with Dr. Knut Wittkowski, PhD
  • Episode 4: Update with Dr. John Ioannidis
  • Episode 3: A Conversation with Dr. David L Katz concerning “Total Harm Minimization”
  • Episode 2: A Conversation with Knut Wittkowski, PhD
  • Episode 1: A Conversation with Dr. John Ioannidis, Stanford University
Episode 23, 2020: A Propaganda Masterpiece - Prof. Mark Crispin Miller, Part Three - The Coup of '63 to Covid (55:50 mp3), Interviewed by John Kirby, Researched and Edited by Francis Karagodins and Evan Dominguez, Illustrated through July 30th, 2021
A Conversation with Mark Crispin Miller, Professor of Media Studies at New York University, June 10th, 2021 - Brooklyn, New York—Updated through September 24, 2021
   “Propaganda isn’t just misinformation. It’s a source of your very identity. People are defining themselves as anti-Trump, pro-mask, pro-vaccine people.”
   “This vaccine cult that is now reigning supreme and wreaking untold havoc—I mean literally untold havoc—on people’s lives and bodies, was actually a long time coming and we have been gradually prepared for it, really for the last several decades.”
   “Black people are entitled to their so-called vaccine hesitancy. That is a perfectly rational suspicion on their part of the intentions of the medical establishment that has a long, horrible history of abusing and exploiting those people.”
   “One definition of conspiracy theory that I favor is, Something that, if true, you couldn’t handle it.”
In Episode 23, the third and final part of “2020: A Propaganda Masterpiece”, Professor Mark Crispin Miller of New York University illustrates how the sudden overthrow of political freedom and bodily sovereignty, nominally triggered of necessity by the emergence of a deadly novel pathogen, has in truth been heading straight for us since November 22, 1963, when President Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas. From the revolutionary resistance of the sixties to the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” of 2021; from a little-known elite movement of the early 20th century that was committed to ridding the world of the “feeble-minded”, to the monolithic policy of mass injection embraced by governments the world over today ... as the 21st century reaches adulthood, Mark Crispin Miller presents the hidden history you ignore at your peril.
Episode 22, “Injections & Injunctions” Part 2/2—Scientific, Technological Elite (49:44 mp3), Interviewed by John Kirby, Researched and edited by Evan Dominguez and Francis Karagodins
A Conversation with Dr. Robert Malone, Madison, Virginia, 18 Aug 2021
In the same Farewell Address in which he famously foresaw the rise of the military-industrial complex, former President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned equally prophetically that a “scientific, technological elite” could one day grow so powerful as to dictate federal policy. In Episode 22 of Perspectives on the Pandemic, Dr. Robert Malone, original inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, illuminates just how greatly the shared financial interests of a handful of Big Pharma players, high-level government bureaucrats and academic institutions have affected life-or-death policy during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Episode 21, “Injections & Injuctions” Part 1/2—Paradox (51:36 mp3), Interviewed by John Kirby, Edited by Francis Karagodins, Researched by Evan Dominguez and Francis Karagodins
A Conversation with Dr. Robert Malone, Madison, Virginia, 18 Aug 2021
   Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy. It may be worth while to spend a few moments in speculating as to possible future developments of those that are oligarchies. It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries.
   Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so.
—Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society, 1951
Dr. Malone:
   “I was brought into this current discussion thread regarding the vaccine technology and safety because of my role in initial discovery and developmentof of the core technology platform.”
   “I build teams to solve complicated problems for the government in biodefense and vaccines and medical countermeasures.”
   “I’ve been through so many of these outbreaks. Dr Fauci just says stuff. He says whatever he feels like saying and it’s not necessarily fact based. It’s just based on his opinion. And we now know that it’s often based on what he thinks is best rather than being grounded in data.”
   “It’s no question that we’ve been told a series of things that just aren’t consistent with data. And we can call them misrepresentations or we can call them flat-out lies. They continue to happen on almost a daily basis.”
   “To the extent that you deploy vaccine, you should deploy vaccine into those extremely high-risk individuals. You should not deploy into the general population.
John Kirby:
   “So why are they doing it? What’s your sense?
Dr. Malone
   “I don’t know. It’s paradoxical. Personally, I think what we’re seeing is rampant war profiteering.”
Episode 20, “This Interview Could Save Your Life” Part Two: The Dangers of the Injections (1:14:31 mp3), Interviewed by John Kirby, Edited by Evan Dominguez, Researched by Francis Karagodins and Evan Dominguez
A Conversation with Dr. Peter McCullough, Dallas, Texas, 4 Aug 2021
     “The American public has seen so much fear, isolation, hospitalization and death that they were prepared—they were prepared to take mass casualties and injury with the vaccine.”
     “Medical care is off its rockers. And I can tell you when Doctors come out of their trance, they are in a vaccine trance right now. They are in a different zone. Doctors, when I look them in the eyes they look cloudy. They look foggy like they know something’s wrong, they know they’re doing something wrong. They’re kind of disturbed. But they can’t seem to come out of their trance. Other Doctors like me, they can see it very clearly. We would never—you give me a vial of a dangerous substance and say inject it into a pregmant woman—I won’t do it. I took an oath. I swore a Hippocratic Oath. As a Doctor I would never do that.”
     “Stop it. Stop it right now before more people are hurt. It’s not working and it’s causing tremendous damage.”
See: Dr Peter McCullough – “The only way to stay healthy right now is to stay away from the Covid-19 Vaccine”, The Daily Exposé, 11 Sep 2021
     “There’s a hunting that’s going on here that’s very disturbing,”
     “This is absolutely astonishing that this is happening over a fair exchange of ideas”
     “We’ve never had two government bodies together be a sponsor of a major research program. Shockingly, they did not have, and to this day they’ve never put together, an external critical event committee, an external data safety monitoring board or a human ethics committee. They had these committees in the registrational trials ... and these are standard. ... Every large clinical investigation has these three committees ... I chair many of these committees for pharmaceutical companies and the National Institutes of Health. Americans should have had at least weekly, if not monthly, reviews of safety to ensure Americans that the jabs are safe.”
     “We’ve seen an incredible violation of human ethics. No one, for an investigational product, under any circumstances, should receive any pressure, coercion or threat of reprisal for not participating in the research.”
     “If we keep this up with the injections, there is going to be one variant after another ... We’re playing with fire here with this mass vaccination ... My interpretation as an internist and cardiologist – I’m a trained epidemiologist, I’ve literally done a year of intense COVID research and training – I’m going to tell you, I think this Delta outbreak that we have right now is the product of mass vaccination. ... If we didn’t have the jab, we would have been better off. We had already treated this down to a very acceptable level.”
     “We’re at this pressure point, and I think right now, in talking to American people in my circles, they’re ready to take a time out ... The only way to stay healthy right now is to stay away from this vaccine. If you get COVID-19, get to one of these treatment networks and get immunity on the other side.”
     “I think we’ve completely suppressed any form of treatment or help to people in order to promote the vaccine. Now the vaccine doesn’t work completely and it’s, frankly, dangerous. We’re down to almost one message: Take the jab or else ... It’s the scariest time to be an American, and thank goodness half of Americans didn’t take it. ... We’re going to have to see what this is going to look like. I think the next month or so is going to be incredibly interesting and it’s going to be ominous.”
Episode 19, “This Interview Could Save Your Life” Part One: Early Treatment (41:14 mp3), Interviewed by John Kirby, Edited by Evan Dominguez, Researched by Francis Karagodins and Evan Dominguez
A Conversation with Dr. Peter McCullough, Dallas, Texas, 4 Aug 2021
Renowned physician and professor of medicine Dr. Peter McCullough describes early treatment protocols for COVID-19 that have saved countless lives... and the forces that have aligned themselves against their widespread adoption.
Resources for early outpatient treatment: The following are the references cited by Dr. McCullough in our interview:
Episode 18, Part Two: 2020: A Propaganda Masterpiece - Divide & Conquer, Prof Mark Crispin Miller (37:21 mp3), Interviewed by John Kirby, Researched and Edited by Francis Karagodins and Evan Dominguez, Illustrated through July 30th, 2021
A Conversation with Mark Crispin Miller, Professor of Media Studies at New York University, June 10th, 2021 - Brooklyn, New York
Full Transcript
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society,” wrote Edward Bernays, the father of modern propaganda. In Episode 18 of Perspectives on the Pandemic, “Divide and Conquer”, Professor Mark Crispin Miller discusses in-depth the media’s “conscious and intelligent manipulation” of major events arising after the COVID rollout in the West. From the corporate hijack of the Black Lives Matter movement, to the fraudulent suppression of life-saving Covid treatments, to the “coup” on January 6th, Miller makes the case that the establishment seeks to inflame a fractured country. Masked vs. unmasked, vaxxed vs. unvaxxed, Red vs. Blue: the ultimate losers of this pro-wrestling drama may be both democracy and science.
As Vincent Salandria wrote in 1971:
Of course, secret elitist police organizations such as the CIA do not thrive on peace, democracy, and a contented and informed people. The power of intelligence agencies increases in direct proportion to the degree of sickness of a nation. A healthy and united people can localize the cancer of a power-usurping intelligence agency and eventually extirpate its malignant cells from the nation’s political life. Therefore, the intelligence apparatus which killed Kennedy has a need to keep our society in turmoil. It has – in order to maintain its power – to generate a high degree of chaos. Chaos is required to make a people willing to accept such strong medicine as is administered by the secret police in order to restore order and to stabilize a disintegrating society. It takes an acutely sick society to be able to accept as palatable the terrible cure – totalitarianism.
Episode 17, Part One: 2020: A Propaganda Masterpiece, Prof Mark Crispin Miller (30:40 mp3), Interviewed by John Kirby, Editing by Francis Karogodins, Research by Evan Dominguez, Billy Clayton, 10 Jun 2021
“Propaganda is the executive arm of the invisible government,” wrote Edward Bernays, the father of modern propaganda. In part one of Episode 17, Mark Crispin Miller, professor of Media Studies at New York University, discusses the propaganda onslaught that defined the year 2020, when what was dismissed one week is confirmed the next, and why questioning official narratives “necessarily means taking ‘conspiracy theory’ seriously.”
Mark Cripsin Miller: “It seems to me that the year 2020 and then the first half of 2021 have comprised a global propaganda spectacle of unprecedented scale and sophistication. I for one believe that we were subjected to a series of carefully planned psychological operations over the course of 2020 and just beyond. I think it started with the roll-out of the virus. This particular instance of fear-mongering is the most persuasive, the most compelling, the most devastating kind of fear-mongering that’s ever really been used in the history of propaganda and that’s really saying something. We’ve seen the fear propaganda move from the Hun to Communism to Terrorism but now it makes the crucial move to the thing itself. The thing with which previous enemies have been compared. The evocation of The Virus Is All Around Us was enough to turn the wits of millions of highly educated people. It’s a very easy matter to get people to do what you want. Just convince them they’re under attack and that anyone who argues with that claim is putting them at risk.”
Episode 16: An Urgent Warning To The World - Dr. Mike Yeadon, former Vice President and Chief Science Officer, Allergy and Respiratory Research Unit, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals (mp3s: Pt1–16:53 / Pt2–15:54 / Pt3–17:46), interviewed by John Kirby, research by Evan Dominguez, Canterbury England, 9 Apr 2021
Two of the experimental gene-based injections have been paused or halted, and reports of clotting, stroke, anaphylaxis, miscarriage, Bell’s Palsy, and a host of other neurologic and auto-immune disorders plague the others. And those are just the short-term risks.
Has all humanity been enrolled in a vast and unimaginably dangerous phase-three clinical trial without our informed consent? All for a disease that for the overwhelming majority of us is, officially, 99.7% or better survivable...if we even get it?
Dr. Mike Yeadon, formerly a Vice President and Chief Science Officer at Pfizer, believes the big experiment is well under way, and that the hypothesis it seeks to prove is as bold as it is terrible.
A cogent and clear thinker who has been attacked in proportion to his qualifications, Dr. Yeadon, at great personal risk, issues a chilling warning, not just about the grave dangers surrounding the injections, but about the looming threat of digital health “passports” that will take inexorable control over every aspect of our lives.
If we allow them.
We have been warned.
Episode 15: Blood Clots and Beyond - A Conversation with Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D. (43:39, mp3), interviewed by John Kirby, Research by Evan Dominguez, with thanks to Oval Media, Kiel, Germany, 29 Mar 2021
In February, 2021, Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D. and a number of his colleagues warned the European Medicines Agency about the potential danger of blood clots and cerebral vein thrombosis in millions of people receiving experimental gene-based injections. Since then, two of the four injections have been suspended or recalled in Europe and the United States for just that reason. In this episode of Perspectives, Professor Bhakdi explains the science behind the problem, why it is not just limited to the products already suspended, and why in the long term we may be creating dangerously overactive immune systems in billions of unwitting subjects.
Episode 14: Catching Up With Knut Wittkowski, PhD (36:47, mp3), interviewed by John Kirby, late Jan 2021
In this episode, we check back in with an epidemiologist who got millions of views on this channel before he was summarily canceled. Now Knut Wittkowski has a dire warning for the world: lockdowns only breed new variants of the virus. Will anyone hear him long enough to weigh the argument, or will open inquiry, the foundation of all scientific endeavor, continue to be suppressed to our peril?
Episode 13: A Conversation with Leemon McHenry, PhD - The Illusion of Evidence-Based Medicine (41:42, mp3), interviewed by John Kirby, Researched by Libby Handros and Francis Karagodins, 11 Mar 2021
As much of the world rushes to receive a lightly-tested pharmaceutical product, we thought it was high time to look again at the (very) big business of medicine. Leemon McHenry, PhD, guides us to the fraudulent core of ghostwritten studies, captured legislators, revolving-door regulatory agencies, pay-to-play medical journals, and the “key opinion leaders” who lend their academic credentials to giant corporations...for a price. With every stage in the process seemingly structured for corruption, we can only wonder along with Professor McHenry: “Who’s looking out for scientific integrity?” By the time you finish this episode of Perspectives, you might just roll down your sleeve for a rethink.
auto-generated transcript with timestamps
Perspectives on the Pandemic interviewed Dr. Judy Mikovits on April 16th, 2020, and again on May 15th. In her second interview, she was joined by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. We have divided the two conversations into three parts, the first two focusing on Dr. Mikovits, and the third on Mr. Kennedy. This is part three.

[0:05:51]
KENNEDY: The Vaccine Act was passed in 1986, by Congress, and it gave vaccine makers blanket immunity from liability. The reason Congress passed the act is because there was a Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis vaccine called the DPT that has since been banned in the United States. It’s still used in Africa by Bill Gates and WHO, they give it to kids there, but it was banned because it was so dangerous in this country. Wyeth (which is now Pfizer) and the other vaccine makers, each one of them had a DPT vaccine, and they were all killing lots of kids and they were causing severe brain injury. They call it encephalopathy. And the industry, Wyeth, particularly, went to Congress and said, We cannot make these vaccines safely. They are “unavoidably unsafe,”—that’s the language they used—you cannot make them safe. And we are losing $20 paying for injuries and lawsuits for every $1 we bring in selling the vaccine. And so, we’re going stop all vaccines unless you give us blanket immunity from liability.

Think about that: Congress did it for a product that they said, We need it because you can’t make it safely. And so, and now, they had no incentive to make it safe, because the lawsuits are all disappeared. Because you can’t sue them: you can’t sue them for medical malpractice, there are no depositions, there’s no discovery, there’s no mass or class action suits, or, document discovery—nothing. They have zero incentive to make them safe. And not only that, because the vaccine industry was exempt from vaccine testing, they’re saving a huge amount of money—hundreds of millions of dollars—because they don’t have to safety test them. The other big cost, after safety testing and licensing, for bringing a drug to market is the subsequent cost of lawsuits. Now they didn’t have that cost. Not only that, but they don’t have any marketing or advertising costs, because the product is mandated to 74 million people and they’re very high-margin products. So, the Gardasil vaccine, they get $420 for the vaccine course. They’re making—if you can get a vaccine on CDC schedule, it’s worth an average of about a billion dollars a year in profit to your company. So, there was a gold rush....

... And then, what happened was, you suddenly had all these vaccines that hit the schedule, beginning in 1989. And 1989 is the beginning of what we call The Vaccine Generation. It is the sickest generation in history, not from infectious disease, but from chronic disease. Chronic disease level in this country in 1940 was 6%. In 1986, when we had 11 vaccines on the schedule, it was 12.8%. If you were born prior to 1989, your chance of having a chronic disease is 12.8%. If you are born after 1989, your chance of having a chronic disease is 54% to 60%. And what are those chronic diseases? There are three main categories.
  1. The neurodevelopmental diseases: ADD, ADHD, SIDS, speech delay, learning disabilities, sleep disorders—these are all neurodevelopmental—tics, Tourette’s syndrome, narcolepsy, ASD, autism. In my generation 1 in 10,000 people have autism. Today, in my children’s generation, 1 in every 34 kids, 1 in every 22 boys.
  2. Then, you have allergies. Vaccines are designed to give you an allergic response to the antigen, to the microbe. They also give you an allergic response to anything else that is injected—the peanut oil excipient, the Timothy weed outbreaks that are occurring at the time you get the vaccines—you now have a lifetime allergy to those. So, children who are vaccinated have 30 times the allergic rhinitis as children who are unvaccinated. Peanut allergies went from 1 in 1,200 Americans, to 1 in every 12. And then you had anaphylaxis and asthma, which are allergic diseases.
  3. Finally, the last category is autoimmune diseases. And those just exploded. And that’s a whole range of diseases where your body essentially gets an allergic reaction to your own organs, and the immune system begins attacking your own organs. So, juvenile diabetes—I only knew one kid growing up who had diabetes; now, it’s everywhere—, rheumatoid arthritis, Guillain-Barre, all these fibromyalgias, and, multiple sclerosis. All these other diseases that exploded....

The vaccine industry when I was a kid was making about 200 million dollars a year. Today it’s making 60 billion. They make 60 billion from the mandated vaccines. But they’re making 500 billion a year treating injuries that are listed as side effects on their vaccines. They are selling us the albuterol inhalers for our children’s asthma, the EpiPens, the anti-seizure medications, the Prozac for the depression, the diabetes medications, the arthritis medications, all of these other—and if you look at the top 20 blockbuster drugs for these four companies, virtually all of them are targeted to treat injuries that are listed as a side effect on their own vaccine inserts. It’s a racket. It is the perfect business model: you make people sick the day they are born, you keep making them sick till their 18th birthday, and then you have a permanent customer. Listen, if you get a measles infection, what’s the treatment? A week in bed, chicken soup, and vitamin D. None of that can be patented. Pharma makes nothing on measles. If you have a measles vaccine, and you give that child seizures, and epilepsy, and encephalopathy, and all these other injuries, you have a permanent customer for life. It’s the perfect business model, but it’s killing our country....

[0:32:29]
KIRBY: Let me ask you both: what is Fauci’s role in all of this? He’s been at the NIAID for, what, four decades? Does he benefit from this somehow? He seems to be at the center of the nexus of all this.

MIKOVITS: Well, he funds six billion dollars so the other end of that for scientists who are working, NIAID funds six billion dollars of research. If investigators don’t publish in these journals, or they give a message of inconvenient truth, he pulls the funding and the journals go on—as we talked about in my case—to destroy the reputation of the scientist. So, if the scientists don’t publish in these journals, they don’t get grants, they don’t get work. They lose their jobs, and it’s a vicious cycle. And that is what was happening and the other authors in my case, they got grant funding from Tony Fauci to—you either end up like Judy Mikovits and you’re no longer in science, or worse—and they’ve gotten millions, tens of millions of dollars of grants. Even Robert Silverman in his laboratory since 2012, for publishing those studies or retracting those studies that were, in fact, fraud. For going along—

KIRBY: What’s Fauci in it for? Is he in it for money or power?

KENNEDY: Let me explain the essence, the dynamic of corruption: Tony Fauci is—you have a vaccine program that is corrupt, because the vaccines are not safety-tested. And so, a huge amount of research goes into creating fraudulent studies to prove that vaccines are safe, when they are not. And so, for example, when they needed to create studies to persuade people that vaccines don’t cause autism, they funded about 17 studies that they have, that’s their archive. Meanwhile, we have 1,400 independent studies that show it is causing autism and these other injuries, but they have 17 studies, and that’s what they show the New York Times, and they say, “Look, it’s proven.”...

Autism doesn’t show up till your 4.2 [years] on average. So, if you are looking at kids who are between 1 and 10, and if you really want to look for autism, you’ll just look at the kids who are between 8 and 10 years old. What they do is they look at the kids who are between 1 and 7 years old. And the autism disappears. And then those groups are overmatched, meaning they—it’s like studying, looking for lung cancer by studying a group that smoked 20 cigarettes a day for 20 years, and a group that smoked 22 cigarettes a day for 20 years, rather than looking at a group that didn’t smoke anything. And that’s what you would do, if you wanted to know the answer. But Tony Fauci would never fund one of those studies. He funds the phony studies that are designed to give cover to the industry. He’s like the Bill Gates of funding. If you want to do science in the United States of America, you’ve got to be friends with Tony Fauci. Because he controls all the funding that’s going to the universities, to the individuals, to the grants, the research centers. If you make an enemy of him, he not only controls all of that funding, that federal funding, but he has the power to stop anybody else who’s going to fund you, like Gates or whatever, from giving you funding. So, he can blackball you for life. And that’s what he did to Judy. She can no longer do science because it costs money to do science, and there’s no money.

And Tony Fauci can cut off that money. So, his posture is that he is going to protect a crooked corrupt vaccine program no matter—that he helped design—no matter what. And that’s what he does.

KIRBY: What’s in it for him? I mean, why—is it just the power of that position, or does he have to cover his—

KENNEDY: If you’re asking what that position does, he’s the most powerful—in his field, in science, he’s the most powerful man in science, in the world. Without question. He controls all that funding. People are begging him for his opinion, for his good will, for his—he’s as powerful as Bill Gates, because he can dictate global health policy. He can tell what study’s going to be done, and what study’s not going to be done, and what the outcome of that study is. He knows in advance, because he approves the study protocol. He’s going to make sure that study doesn’t find anything. So, he’s locked into that position because he can’t afford to leave it. He’s got to stay there till he dies. Like so many of the people at CDC who were involved in the corruption. They can’t let somebody come in behind them and say, “Oh my god, look what this guy did!” They need to die in those chairs.

And Tony Fauci is one of those guys who spent 50 years in an escalating—corruption always is a vortex; it gets larger and larger. He may have started off, somewhere, 40 years ago, just doing one crooked study, but now, in order to hold—they have piled fraud, upon fraud, upon fraud, upon fraud, and the structure they have created with their vaccine program is so tall and so unwieldy, if somebody kicks out even a single brick, the whole thing will tumble. His function is to make sure that brick doesn’t get kicked out. Every little leak in the dam is plugged with one of his crooked studies and that’s a full-time job, even when you’ve got six billion dollars a year.

Episode 11: A Conversation with Dr. Judy Mikovits and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Pt 2 of 3) (1:09:39, mp3)
auto-generated transcripts: with timestamps, without timestamps
Perspectives on the Pandemic interviewed Dr. Judy Mikovits on April 16th, 2020, and again on May 15th. In her second interview, she was joined by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. We have divided the two conversations into three parts, the first two focusing on Dr. Mikovits, and the third on Mr. Kennedy. This is part two.
Episode 10: A Conversation with Dr. Judy Mikovits and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Pt 1 of 3) (1:12:31, mp3)
auto-generated transcripts: with timestamps, without timestamps
Perspectives on the Pandemic interviewed Dr. Judy Mikovits on April 16th, 2020, and again on May 15th. In her second interview, she was joined by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. We have divided the two conversations into three parts, the first two focusing on Dr. Mikovits, and the third on Mr. Kennedy. This is part one.
Beginning at 63:26:
John Kirby: On the subject of masks you made the claim that wearing them outside—I suppose of acute clinical situations—is unhelpful. That it literally activates your own virus. You’re getting sick you said from your own reactivated coronavirus expressions. Science, the journal, claims to not know what you mean by that.
Mikovits: Wearing the mask literally activates your own virus. You’re getting sick from your own reactivated coronavirus expressions, and if it happens to be SARS-CoV-2, then you’ve got a big problem.
It’s not clear what Mikovits means by “coronavirus expressions.” There is no evidence that wearing a mask can activate viruses and make people sick.
Fact-checking Judy Mikovits, the controversial virologist attacking Anthony Fauci in a viral conspiracy video,” 8 May 2020
Can you explain in more detail what you’re suggesting?

Judy Mikovits: Eight percent of our of our genome is a virome. That is all of the exposures that we’ve had and we clear and we develop immune responses to. Many are latent like herpes viruses, like those retroviruses, they’re dormant Your immune system has in balance. They’re not expressed.

If you put on a mask and you’re exercising and you’re not breathing air, you’re actually breathing CO2, you can become, it’s called Lactic Acidosis, so you become acid and you’re actually denying yourself oxygen, hypoxia and then some. It’s immune suppressive. It suppresses your very CD4 positive T cells, that adaptive memory immunity. So you activate the dormant because your memory was keeping those silent.

And this isn’t new, this isn’t just me saying it. This is basic immunology and they know it. Activate latent viruses, they cause disease. And the mask is immune suppressive and that’s clear.
Episode 9: The Epicenter Nurse - A Conversation with Erin Marie Olszewski (1:10:34, mp3), interviewed by John Kirby, New York City, May 12, 2020
Nurse-turned-investigative journalist-Erin Marie Olszewski has been on the inside in two radically different settings these past few months. Two hospitals. One private, the other public. One in Florida, the other in New York.
And not just any New York public hospital, but the “epicenter of the epicenter” itself, the infamous Elmhurst in Donald Trump’s Queens. As a result of these diametrically opposed experiences, she has the ultimate “perspective on the pandemic”. She has been where there have been the most deaths attributed to Covid-19 and where there have been the least. Those who see and hear Erin’s astonishing report and her incredible undercover recordings will learn: Much of which points to what may be the real reason black and brown Americans seem to be disproportionately affected by Covid-19. They are likely not dying because of some alleged genetic predisposition or a peculiar array of Covi-combustible comorbidities.
But they are certainly dying from an underlying condition: a defunded, criminally negligent and corrupt hospital system, which during this crisis seems to take extra pains to do them in, and which may be financially incentivized to do so. (As of this writing, the producers are still awaiting word from the relevant authorities as to the exact amount of compensation paid per Covid diagnosed-and-vented patient).
Experimented on by unsupervised doctors-in-training, misdiagnosed and rushed on to ventilators based on edicts from anonymous supervisors, Elmhurst and other public hospital patients have not stood a chance. Perhaps with this video, some accounting can be made and real changes demanded.
But there is also extremely good news to be found here: no one, or almost no one, may need to die from Covid-19. What doctors and researchers all over the United States and the world have known for months has been confirmed once again by nurse Olszewski, and may finally be emerging from the political ghetto to which it was so oddly and so early relegated. Hydroxychloroquine and zinc and/or other therapies have been shown to work, especially when given early to those few people who actually develop symptoms of Covid-19.
What was once apparently the exclusive purvey of MAGA-hat-wearing-Trumpeters must now be made available to us all: a new study from Yale again confirms it, and the “study” which alleged that hydroxychloroquine was not only ineffective but deadly has been withdrawn from the Lancet amid what has to be one of the most bizarre scientific scandals in modern times. The company that produced the demonstrably fraudulent data that formed the basis of the Lancet paper listed among its board members an adult entertainer and a science-fiction writer.
Based on their disinformation, studies around the world were halted for weeks. Now free of the specter—or boogeyman—of harm, even the WHO has resumed research on this decades-old, amazingly inexpensive drug. (Youtube censors take note).
But though we at Perspectives are well and truly beyond the manufactured partisan divisions of our day, we must acknowledge that one’s odds of surviving Covid-19 in Red State America are demonstrably higher than among the Blues. It’s enough to give a progressive New York filmmaker thoughts of pulling up stakes. For when have they been much higher?
(As of publication of this video, the producers are still awaiting comment from Elmhurst Hospital).
Episode 8: The Monopoly Edition with author Matt Stoller (1:09:28, mp3), interviewed by John Kirby, Washington, D.C., May 7th, 2020
In this “monopoly edition” of Perspectives, Matt Stoller, author of Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy, forecasts the actual amount of the Wall Street bailout; the coming disappearance of most small business; the problems that emerge when monopolies control health care; the emergence of a Wall Street-oriented “planned economy” the failure of progressives to stop the theft of trillions, and much more.
Episode 7: A Conversation with Investigative Journalist Sam Husseini (59:54, mp3), interviewed by John Kirby & Libby Handros, Riverdale, Maryland, May 7th, 2020
Investigative journalist Sam Husseini has had a storied career asking world leaders questions they would prefer to dodge, on subjects ranging from missing weapons of mass destruction to very real nuclear stockpiles. Now he takes on the "elephant in the room": the extreme dangers posed by bio-research facilities not just in China, but all over the world...
[0:27:40]
Husseini: That [Feb 2020] letter [to the Lancet] was ostensibly to show solidarity with the workers in Wuhan, but it also had a phrase denouncing the conspiracy theories as to the non-natural origin of the pandemic. And again, it was an attempt to shut down debate. To me, that’s totally antithetical to the scientific process. The scientific process should welcome scrutiny and debate on serious questions like this, and then you have a hypothesis, and you break the hypothesis, and you produce evidence and reasonable argument. They attempted to short-circuit all of that by saying, ‘This is conspiracy stuff.’
Episode 6: A Conversation with Dr. Dan Erickson & Dr. Artin Massihi (47:17, mp3), interviewed by John Kirby, Bakersfield, California, April 28th, 2020; Translation: German transcript
When Dr. Dan Erickson and Dr. Artin Massihi held a press conference on April 22nd about the results of testing they conducted at their urgent care facilities around Bakersfield, California, the video, uploaded by a local ABC news affiliate, went viral. After reaching five million views, YouTube took it down on the grounds that it “violated community standards.” We followed up with the doctors to determine what was so dangerous about their message. What we discovered were reasonable and well-meaning professionals whose voices should be heard.
Episode 5: A Conversation with Dr. Knut Wittkowski, PhD (1:12:58, mp3), interviewed by John Kirby, Stanford Univ., 17 April 2020; Translation: German transcript
Knut Wittkowski states his initial claim has been vindicated: The lockdowns—always a dubious proposition for a respiratory virus—came too late in the U.S. and elsewhere, and were therefore not effective or useful. By turns emotional and darkly comic, Wittkowski ranges across all the essential topics of the crisis, and gives answers unlikely to be reflected in major media.
[0:26:39]
WITTKOWSKI: What you should do, however, and what was not done in the United States, is to protect the elderly. From the experience in Italy, we already knew that the vast majority of people who die are people in their 70’s, 80’s and 90’s who have comorbidities. So that was nothing new when it also happened in Seattle. We had the very early experience, in Seattle, of a couple of people, old people with comorbidities, dying in a nursing home. At that point in time, one should have isolated at least the nursing homes. Pay the nurses and everybody working there overtime so that they can stay there for three or four weeks. Sorry, my voice is breaking because I think that is a tragedy. This opportunity was missed. Instead, people were isolating the children, who are not at risk at all.
You still don’t really know whether children are infected or not, and if they are infected, they never, or virtually never, develop a phenotype. To isolate those who are not at risk, and put those at risk who are at risk, is a catastrophe. It’s a human catastrophe that should never, ever have happened. And if people say they don’t have money for that, for 2 trillion dollars you can pay a lot of overtime. You could have made all of these people millionaires, and there would be a lot of money left, and we would have really protected the virus from getting into the nursing homes and killing those who are the most vulnerable.
KIRBY: All we’ve really done, you’re suggesting, in addition to not adequately protecting the old, we have slowed the spread of herd immunity.
WITTKOWSKI: Yes. And that means we have increased the risk of the elderly to become infected. Because you cannot isolate yourself for extended periods of time. Isolation for a short period of time is easy. But for a long period of time, it’s just human—the grandparents want to see their grandchildren.
Episode 4: Update with Dr. John Ioannidis (1:12:58, mp3), interviewed by John Kirby, Stanford Univ., 17 April 2020, Translation: German transcript
Dr. John Ioannidis discusses the results of three preliminary studies, (including his latest showing a drastically reduced infection fatality rate); the worrisome effects of the lockdown; the Swedish approach; the Italian data; the ups and downs of testing; the feasibility of "contact tracing", and more. Dr. Ioannidis does not have a political agenda, nor does he favor making money over saving lives. He is simply the best respected epidemiologist and meta-statistician in the world. And his latest preliminary serology study shows that many more of us have had this than we realize—50-85 times more of us—and therefore the “infection fatality rate” is equivalent to seasonal flu. The work of Dr Ioannidis is part of a growing army of data, including the revised estimates of Imperial College and the CDC, (not to mention the original work of Dr. Fauci himself), that make that conclusion clear.
Episode 3: A Conversation with Dr. David L Katz concerning “Total Harm Minimization”, interviewed by John Kirby and Libby Handros, Hamden, CT, April 9, 2020
John Kirby talks with Dr. David L. Katz, the author of the much-debated March 20th New York Times op-ed, “Is Our Fight Against the Coronavirus Worse Than the Disease?” Dr. Katz discusses his proposal for “total harm minimization,” a plan that seeks to protect people both from Covid-19 and the host of ills that result from social isolation and economic shut-down.
Episode 2: A Conversation with Knut Wittkowski, PhD, interviewed by John Kirby, Libby Handros and Lee Davis, NYC April 1&2, 2020, Translation: German transcript
Prof Knut Wittkowski, for 20 years head of Rockefeller Univ’s Dept of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design, says social distancing and lockdown is the worst way to deal with an airborne respiratory virus and offers data showing China and South Korea had already reached their peak number of cases when they instituted containment measures. In other words, nature had already-or-nearly achieved, herd immunity. Prof Wittkowski urges schools open now so the virus may spread harmlessly among the young, and thus shorten the amount of time elderly and immune compromised must be sequestered. Our current course, he warns, will only prolong the crisis and likely guarantee a “second wave” of infections in the Fall.
The first three months of the COVID-19 epidemic: Epidemiological evidence for two separate strains of SARS-CoV-2 viruses spreading and implications for prevention strategies - Two epidemics of COVID-19, Knut Wittkowski, Asdera LLC, New York, NY (work-in-process)
Episode 1: A Conversation with Dr. John Ioannidis, Stanford University, (1:02:46, video, mp3) inteviewed by John Kirby, 25 Mar 2020
Dr. John P.A. Ioannidis is C.F. Rehnborg Chair in Disease Prevention, Professor of Medicine, of Health and Research Policy, of Biomedical Data Science, and of Statistics, and is the Co-Director of the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford. He cautions we do not have reliable data to make long-term decisions about COVID-19 and an extended lockdown might have far graver effects than the disease itself.
A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data,” Dr. Ioannidis, STAT, 17 Mar 2020

The map below features some of the projects Bloomberg is pursuing through his foundation including: behavioral economic nudges, blockchain identity, digital governance, labor market analytics, performance-based government contracting, and interoperable data systems. It is important to note in the upper left corner of the map his involvement with the Global Parliament of Mayors and their advancement of vaccinations as a key area of interest. Lots of data here. Lots of data to train AI.
Wrench in the Gears, 17 May 2020
A Skeptical Parent’s Thoughts on Digital Curriculum
Bill and Melinda Gates have leading roles to play in the unfolding drama that is Covid-19. Everything seems to be advancing according to Davos’s plan. The soon-to-be trillionaire couple has provided useful cover for their fellow billionaires, the ones backstage pulling the ropes that will drop the Fourth Industrial Revolution scenery for the techno-fascist second act. Even now a chorus line of contact tracers assembles in the wings. In short order they’ll take center stage – donning newly minted digital certificates of compliance and indoctrination.
This post is about one of the production’s underwriters, Michael Bloomberg. Bloomberg, in coordination with New York governor Andrew Cuomo, paid Johns Hopkins to choreograph this viral surveillance roll out with the Rockefeller Foundation looking on from the royal box.

Trying to stay “safe” is nowhere near as important as trying to stay HUMAN
This is the new morphing of Trump hatred, the new way to pretend to be murdered by Trump, and get love from all your friends, who never heard of Lynn Margulis, and who think Fauci is a savior, as opposed to a mobster. He’s not a scientist. I know what a scientist is, what a scientist sounds like. They don’t accuse people of murder, for one thing.
I’m angry too.
But as is always the case, their anger has the wheel and mine is an oppressed minority.
Today, I tweeted this:
Covid is code for de-humanization on an industrial scale. It is rooted in the little scorpion we once called “political correctness” which stripped out humanistic moral code and replaced it with militant stances. Millennials the target generation. The offer: “No need to FEEL.”
Robert F Kennedy Jr talks vaccines, Dr Fauci, family history and JFK assassination with Patrick Bet-David
Childrens Health Defense: childrenshealthdefense.org
Instagram: @robertfkennedyjr instagram.com/robertfkennedyjr/
Books:
[19:33]
My party, the Democratic Party is the worst on this issue. It’s very odd to me that they’re mandating these vaccines that are untested. How can you mandate any medication for a human being? How can you tell somebody, We are gonna force you to take a medication that you don’t want to take? We signed a treaty, the Nuremberg Charter, after World War Two because the Nazis were doing that. They were testing vaccines on people and all these other medical treatments and we said that is a war crime. We don’t do that to people. And we signed the Siracusa Principles, UN Charter on Human Rights, Helsinki Accords, the Nuremberg Charter—all of those say in them, you cannot give a medication to somebody against their will even if a life of the nation is at stake. That’s a quote.
58. No state party shall, even in time of emergency threatening the life of the nation, derogate from the Covenant’s guarantees of the right to life; freedom from torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and from medical or scientific experimentation without free consent; freedom from slavery or involuntary servitude; the right not to be imprisoned for contractual debt; the right not to be convicted or sentenced to a heavier penalty by virtue of retroactive criminal legislation; the right to recognition as a person before the law; and freedom of thought, conscience and religion. These rights are not derogable under any conditions even for the asserted purpose of preserving the life of the nation.
Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Derogation of Provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Annex, UN Doc E/CN.4/1984/4 (1984), p. 6
And yet we’re mandating these drugs and not only are we forcing people to take one and we know they cause injury. The Vaccine Court has paid out four billion dollars. And they are severely limited, those judgments. Even HHS admits at the Vaccine Court, fewer than 1% of injuries ever gets reported or awarded. So make that four hundred billion. We know they cause a lot of injuries. Even if they cause one injury how can you force a human being to take it against their will? It makes no sense.

The Nuremberg Code (1947)

Permissible Medical Experiments
  1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
    This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
    The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
[45:17]
Robert Kennedy, Jr.:
Fauci has a bias towards vaccines and he owns the vaccine. So he has the patents. He literally owns vaccine patents.
Patrick Bet-David:
Is it purely profit motivation, is [it] purely profit?
RFK, Jr.:
No. I think it’s power. And I think the same is true with Gates. Both of them actually stand to make huge amounts of money, potentially billions of dollars. I don’t believe—it’s very hard to look into another man’s brain and I try not to do that. But just looking at them I really believe that their motivation is more about power. And there is no more powerful position than being a health official because you can literally dictate. At this point, Tony Fauci has powers that no American president has ever had. He’s telling people in California: You can’t go to the beach, You can’t go in the ocean, You can’t go shop, Your kids can’t go to school, You have to stay in your house. Two days ago they were giving thousand dollar tickets to people who were swimming in the ocean and surfing. No president’s ever had that kind of power before. But today Fauci, who’s very very close partners with Gates, are telling America and what they’re saying—if you listen carefully—what they’re saying is: You all are are gonna stay in the house until we have a vaccine. It’s not gonna be safe to come out. And that is a tremendous power to tell people they have to wait and do that until you get a vaccine.

Wrench in the Gears, 19 Apr 2020
A Skeptical Parent’s Thoughts on Digital Curriculum
Over the past month, the gaze of investigative researchers has been fixed on GAVI, Bill Gates, Gates’s associates like Fauci, and the over-size influence they are having on public health policy around Covid-19. Use the link for the map [above] to dig further into the relationships. The members of the 2012 Development Impact Bond (DIB) Working Group Report are of particular interest, since DIBs are being considered as a way to finance vaccination campaigns.
Public health is a servant of bond markets and financiers. A glance at the participants in this working group makes it clear, doses and people and death and suffering are just going to be part of their market analysis. For too many people, openly discussing concerns about vaccines remains a third-rail. But we DO have to learn how to talk about this to one another, because the stakes are too damn high to shy away from it. I also believe these campaigns and the tracking systems associated with them have been structured as an imperial enterprise and should be treated with profound caution.


    Films / Recordings    
Contents


Source-Linked Transcript, The Corbett Report, May 2020

Who is Bill Gates? A software developer? A businessman? A philanthropist? A global health expert? This question, once merely academic, is becoming a very real question for those who are beginning to realize that Gates’ unimaginable wealth has been used to gain control over every corner of the fields of public health, medical research and vaccine development. And now that we are presented with the very problem that Gates has been talking about for years, we will soon find that this software developer with no medical training is going to leverage that wealth into control over the fates of billions of people. (23:56, mp3)

In January of 2010, Bill and Melinda Gates announced a $10 billion pledge to usher in a decade of vaccines. But far from an unalloyed good, the truth is that this attempt to reorient the global health economy was part of a much bigger agenda. An agenda that would ultimately lead to greater profits for big pharma companies, greater control for the Gates Foundation over the field of global health, and greater power for Bill Gates to shape the course of the future for billions of people around the planet. (28:01, mp3)

The takeover of public health that we have documented in How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health and the remarkably brazen push to vaccinate everyone on the planet that we have documented in Bill Gates’ Plan to Vaccinate the World was not, at base, about money. The unimaginable wealth that Gates has accrued is now being used to purchase something much more useful: control. Control not just of the global health bodies that can coordinate a worldwide vaccination program, or the governments that will mandate such an unprecedented campaign, but control over the global population itself. (36:47, mp3)

There can be no doubt that Bill Gates has worn many hats on his remarkable journey from his early life as the privileged son of a Seattle-area power couple to his current status as one of the richest and most influential people on the planet. But, as we have seen in our exploration of Gates’ rise as unelected global health czar and population control advocate, the question of who Bill Gates really is is no mere philosophical pursuit. Today we will attempt to answer that question as we examine the motives, the ideology, and the connections of this man who has been so instrumental in shaping the post-coronavirus world. (38:45, mp3)
From the conclusion of Part Four
[W]e cannot expect an answer about Bill Gates true motives to come from Gates himself. By this point the question of Bill Gates’ intentions has been buried under the combined weight of hundreds of millions of dollars of paid PR spin. Like the Rockefellers before them, the Gates have long since learned the secret of enlarging their family fortune—not to mention their control over the human population—by donning the mask of philanthropy.

There are many perspectives on Bill Gates; depending on who you ask, he is a computer savant, a genius businessman, or a saintly philanthropist. But all of these perspectives have been brought to you through PR outlets founded or funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Bill Gates is no longer a subject for historians but hagiographers.

Now we must confront the question of why this man is motivated to build such a web of control—control over our public health agencies—

GATES: And for all 193 member states, you must make vaccines a high priority in your health systems, to ensure that all your children have access to existing vaccines now—and to new vaccines as they become available.

SOURCE: BILL GATES TO WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY: IMMUNIZE EVERY CHILD, May 17, 2011

Control over our identities—

GATES: And the lack of an ID system is a problem, not just for the payment system, but also for voting and health and education and taxation. And so it’s a wonderful thing to go in and create a broad identification system

SOURCE: Bill Gates at the Financial Inclusion Forum, December 1, 2015

Control over our transactions—

GATES: Once financial flows go underground—where you have lots of legitimate transactions mixed in with the ones you want to track—and once they’re going over a digital system that the US has no connection to, it’s far more difficult to find the transactions that you want to be aware of or that you want to block.

SOURCE: Bill Gates at the Financial Inclusion Forum, December 1, 2015

And even control over our bodies—

GATES: We’re gonna have this intermediate period of opening up, and it won’t be normal until we get an amazing vaccine to the entire world.

SOURCE: Watch CNBC’s full interview with Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates on the coronavirus pandemic and his work toward a vaccine

We must confront the possibility that this quest for control comes not from a selfless spirit of generosity that never seemed to exist before he became a multi-billionaire, but from the same drive for money, the same desire for domination and the same sense of superiority that motivated him on his way up the corporate ladder.

But if the answer to the question “Who is Bill Gates” is “Bill Gates is a eugenicist,” that tells us some important things about the world that we are living in.

It tells us that Gates is deceiving the public into supporting his takeover of the world with a false front of philanthropy.

It tells us that the goal of the Gates, like the goal of the Rockefellers before them, is not to improve the world for humankind, but to improve the world for their kind.

And most importantly, it tells us that Bill Gates is no comic-book supervillain, single-handedly directing all of the chaos that is unfolding in the world or single-handedly bringing his own order to that chaos.

No, if Bill Gates is a eugenicist, driven by a belief in the superiority of himself and his fellow wealthy elitists, then what we are facing is not one man, or even one family, but an ideology.

This is not a trivial point. One man, whatever his wealth, can be stopped easily enough. But even if Bill Gates were to be thrown in jail tomorrow, the agenda that has already been set in motion would continue without missing a beat. An entire infrastructure of researchers, labs, corporations, governmental agencies and public health bodies exists, funded more often than not by Gates, but driven by the belief of all those millions of people working for these various entities that they are truly working in the best interest of the people.

No, an ideology cannot be stopped by stopping one man. It can only be stopped when enough people learn the truth about this agenda and the world of total, pervasive control that is coming into view.

If you have watched all four parts of this exploration on Bill Gates, then you are now one of the most informed people on the planet about the true nature of this agenda. You have seen how the takeover of public health has been used to railroad the world into a headlong rush toward mandatory vaccinations, biometric identification and digital payments. You have seen how the pieces of this puzzle fit together, and how they represent a far greater threat to the future of humanity than any virus.

Here is the good news: Armed with this information, you have the antidote to the scourge of this eugenicist ideology. The truth is that ideologies are viruses of the mind; they spread from person to person, infecting them with ideas that can lead to a disease of the body politic.

But here is the even greater truth: Inoculations do work. Inoculations of truth against the lies of those spreading their poisonous ideology.

If you have made it this far, it is incumbent on you to help inoculate those around you against the corrupt ideology of Bill Gates and all those who seek to control the population of the world. You must help to spread this information so that others have a chance to see the bigger picture and decide for themselves whether they are willing to roll up their sleeves and accept what is coming, or not.

But time is not on our side. Even as we speak, mass vaccination campaigns are being prepared:

ALLISON ARWADY: You know we are already building our plans to vaccinate the whole city of Chicago and working with others across the region on a major plan for this. We’ve bought syringes, we’ve bought cold boxes, we’ve planned out locations.

SOURCE: COVID COACH

Biometric identification schemes and “immunity passports” are already being rolled out:

CARYN SEIDMAN BECKER: And so while we started with travel, at our core we’re a biometric-secure identity platform, where it’s always been about attaching your identity to your boarding pass at the airport or your ticket to get into a sports stadium or your credit card to buy a beer. And so now with the launch of Clear Health Pass, it’s about attaching your identity to your COVID-related health insights for employers, for employees, for customers.

SOURCE: CLEAR’s new Health Pass service to help screen for coronavirus: CEO

Programs for tracking, tracing, and surveilling the entire population are already being beta-tested:

DEENA HINSHAW: Today we are launching another useful tool that can supplement the critical detective work we are conducting in public health. Alberta Trace Together is a voluntary, secure, mobile contact tracing application to help prevent the spread of COVID-19.

SOURCE: Alberta rolls out COVID-19 contact tracing app

And the digital payment infrastructure, the system of financial exclusion that will allow governments to turn off our access to the economy at will, is being put into place:

UHURU KENYATTA: In order to avoid the risk of transmission through physical handling of money, we encourage the use of cashless transactions such as mobile money, M-Pesa and otherwise, and credit cards.

SOURCE: Uhuru: Government encourages cashless transactions to reduce risk of coronavirus transmission

NICHOLAS THOMPSON: People are using touchless payment systems much more than they’re using cash, both because we’re not interacting with people directly as much anymore and also because cash is kind of skeezy.

SOURCE: A Post-Pandemic Cashless Society? Was Remote NFL Draft a Tech Success? | Tech In :60 | GZERO Media

We must spread the word about the dark nature of this population control agenda to as many people as we can before our ability to speak out against this agenda is taken away for good.

Thanks to the likes of Bill Gates, the virus of this population control agenda is already here. It is threatening to crash the system as we’ve known it.

But if Bill Gates has taught us anything, it’s how to deal with a virus.

It’s time for a hard reset.

Letter from the madhouse

The media campaign of 11 September 2001 proved to leaders that it is possible with modern technology to bamboozle millions of people without firing a single shot. Goebbels was unable to achieve this feat. The campaign has left millions still believing until today that 9/11 was the work of Islamic fanatics. One would never have dreamt that in the internet era, the majority of university graduates will fall prey to such an absurd fairy tale.

This successful experiment in mass manipulation is now being repeated with even more spectacular results. Whereas in 2001 the effects of the media campaign were limited to filling the minds of millions with images of Osama bin Laden and scaring them against fake terrorists, the current campaign goes further. It proves the ability of leaders to manipulate not only the beliefs but also the material behavior of the masses by telling them what to do. Entire peoples obey like small children the orders of professional liars who are not even their parents. China and Israel with their all-out mass surveillance systems, recording every action of every citizen, constitute the wet dream of Western leaders. They go to China and Israel and admire how orderly and obedient the masses are disciplined. Corona has given them the right tool to direct people, no matter how absurd the order. It will probably still take another mass propaganda campaign to ensure that Western peoples will stand in queue and beg to be led by Big Brother. Dissidents will be sent to « education camps », the Chinese method.

I have never before lived in a madhouse. It’s a new experience, rather unpleasant, I must say. But we three family members survive the birthpangs of the new age of state terrrorism thanks to music, the garden and our love of free thought.

Elias Davidsson, 25 April 2020
16 August 2021: Children’s Health Defense along with 18 students filed a 105-page lawsuit in Federal Court against Rutgers University, its board of governors, Rutgers President Jonathan Holloway and others over the university’s decision to mandate COVID vaccines for students attending school in the fall.
     According to the complaint, the Rutgers vaccine requirement “is an affront to human dignity and personal freedom because it violates our basic right to control our bodies.” [p.3]
     The lawsuit states that in a free society, “all people have the right to decide their own medical treatment – especially to decide what to inject into their bodies. And every person has the right to make that decision voluntarily, free from coercion by anyone, and to be fully informed of the benefits and especially the risks of that decision.”[p.3-4]
     The lawsuit alleges Rutgers’ policy is a violation of the right to informed consent and the right to refuse unwanted medical treatments.
     The following excerpt is pages 81-83 of the complaint:

Alternatives to Experimental Immunization

         217. There are now well-studied, safe and reliable alternatives to vaccination to prevent and treat COVID-19, including, but not limited to, Ivermectin, Methylprednisolone, Fluvoxamine, Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin C, Vitamin D3, Zinc, Melatonin, Aspirin, corticosteroids and other accessible therapies. Randomized-controlled trials and observations by front line medical practitioners have confirmed that COVID-19 is preventable and treatable, especially at early onset with medicines and practices that have proved safe for decades. As a result, the pandemic can end now without vaccines – based upon current scientific knowledge and understanding. Vaccines are not necessary to defeat COVID-19. Defendants did not take this into consideration in issuing their mandate.
         218. The treatment for COVID-19 infection has improved tremendously since its advent. Studies have shown several different treatment methods which have proven safe and effective. For example, a combination of medications, supported by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, for a minimum of five days and acutely administered supplements used for the initial ambulatory patient with suspected and confirmed COVID-19 (moderate or greater probability) has proven effective.32 Defendants did not take this into consideration in issuing their mandate.
         219. More significantly, FLCCC has developed the most comprehensive prevention and treatment protocols for COVID-19 to date.33 This organization is composed of some of the most well-established and published doctors in the world, who are treating patients in hospitals. In particular, they are best known for their evaluation, use and championing of Ivermectin as a solution to end the COVID-19 pandemic based on numerous scientific studies demonstrating its dramatic prophylactic and treatment capabilities.34 Defendants did not take this into consideration in issuing their mandate.
         220. Ivermectin has been used over-the-counter for COVID in many countries and regions with excellent reported treatment success. The drug’s safety has been established with at least a billion doses used, and the drug is on the World Health Organization’s list of essential drugs.
         221. Many medical professionals suspect FDA’s feigned ignorance about Ivermectin was a prerequisite to issuing EUAs for COVID vaccines, given the EUA requirement that no approved drug may be available for the same indication. Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, both of which have extremely long biological half lives, can be given infrequently as prophylaxis for COVID.

32 See Brian C. Procter; Casey Ross; Vanessa Pickard; Erica Smith; Cortney Hanson; Peter A. McCullough, Clinical outcomes after early ambulatory multidrug therapy for high risk SARS-CoV-2 (COVID 19) infection, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine (December 30, 2020), available at https://rcm.imrpress.com/EN/10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.260 (last visited on August 4, 2021).
33 See FLCCC’s prevention and treatment protocols for COVID-19 available at https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/ .
34 See Kory, Pierre MD; Meduri, Gianfranco Umberto MD; Varon, Joseph MD; Iglesias, Jose DO; Marik, Paul E. MD, Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19, American Journal of Therapeutics (May/June 2021) available at https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Fulltext/2021/06000/Review_of_the_Emerging_Evidence_Demonstrating_the.4.aspx (last visited on August 4, 2021).

   CRITICAL ANALYSIS    

Covid-19 Death Numbers Exaggerated
Ongoing
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
December 2020
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
Pre-2020

GLOBAL REPORT 2019-n CoV novel coronavirus
PDF: 30 Oct 2020 version
Updated in real time: http://tiny.cc/protondownload
Download: http://tiny.cc/protondownload
Covid-19 Death Numbers Exaggerated
Mark Crispin Miller: News From Underground at substack
26 Aug 2020 - 22 Aug 2021: https://markcrispinmiller.com/category/nfu/
Thru 25 Aug 2020: http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground
Will this crisis usher in FEDERAL mandatory mass vaccinations?
It will if we allow it.
A growing chorus—of ordinary citizens and world-renowned medical and scientific experts—is raising questions about matters ranging from the coronavirus’s origins to the rationale for continued lockdowns.
8 MORE Experts Questioning the Coronavirus Panic,” Off Guardian, 17 Apr 2020
10 MORE Experts Criticising the Coronavirus Panic,” Off Guardian, 28 Mar 2020
12 Experts Questioning the Coronavirus Panic,” Off Guardian, 24 Mar 2020
On the Possible Origins of Coronavirus, Part 1,” Toby Rogers, Ph.D. & Team, Children’s Health Defense, 7 May 2020

A Timeline—Pandemic and Erosion of Freedoms Have Been Decades in the Making,” Children’s Health Defense Team, 21 May 2020
Ongoing

November 2021

October 2021

September 2021

August 2021

July 2021

June 2021

May 2021

April 2021

March 2021

February 2021

Going Direct Reset
Solari Report by Catherine Austin Fitts, 2020 Wrap Up, The Going Direct Reset
The “novel” coronavirus pandemic marks the greatest turning point in U.S. monetary history since the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913. The Virus Pandemic and the Federal Reserve are fascinating historical figures for many reasons, starting with the deceptions their very names work on the public. “Federal” Reserve falsely implies that “the Fed” is an agency of the federal government when in fact it is a cartel of 12 private banks acting in concert from different locations to skim interest payments off the top of the U.S. money supply in perpetuity. “Coronavirus pandemic” deliberately misdiagnoses the real disease at the root of the current crisis, which is not in fact any virus (hint: it has a 99+% survival rate) but rather a radical plan for the eventual takeover of the U.S. monetary system by the privately owned Federal Reserve.
~ John Titus, The Going Direct Reset
Introduction by Catherine Austin Fitts
What you are about to read is one of the most important reports of modern financial history yet written. This report is essential to understand the world in which you and I live and what will happen next—this year and for many years to come. On August 22, 2019, a group of central bankers from the G7 nations gathered in Jackson Hole, Wyoming and voted to approve the Going Direct Reset. We know this because Pam and Russ Martens published an article about it on June 5, 2020 at their website, Wall Street on Parade. That article—and the Martens’ extraordinary continuing coverage of the “ongoing financial coup d’état”—is why Solari chose them as the Solari Heroes of the Year for 2020.
It’s called “Going Direct.” That’s the financial bailout plan designed and authored by former central bankers now on the payroll at BlackRock, an investment manager of $7 trillion in stock and bond funds. The plan was rolled out in August 2019 at the G7 summit of central bankers in Jackson Hole, Wyoming – months before the public was aware of any financial crisis. One month later, on September 17, 2019, the U.S. Federal Reserve would begin an emergency repo loan bailout program, making hundreds of billions of dollars a week in loans by “going direct” to the trading houses on Wall Street.
~ Pam and Russ Martens
The Going Direct Reset Introduction by John Titus
Timeline of Key Economic Events of the Going Direct Reset
Primer on Our Debt-Based Monetary System
Players List - Who’s Who in the Going Direct Reset
Part I: Trends We Track
Part I: Top Ten Stories
Best Evidence Videos
Rambus Blockbuster Chartology
Part II: Unanswered Questions, Take Action & Inspiration
Food for the Soul: Artists and the Money-changers
Times of Economic Changes – Movie List

January 2021

December 2020

November 2020

October 2020


at 11:14
Who Voted In Davos? How Data-Driven Government and the Internet of Bodies Are Poised To Transform Smart Sustainable Cities Into Social Impact Prisons, (28:58, mp3) Alison McDowell, Wrench In The Gears, 27 Oct 2020
This is a transript of Alison McDowell’s presentation complete with all slides inlined. The talk itself ends at 13:16. Afterwards, it gets very interesting at 13:52 when moderator Naomi Klein states “I personally am not comfortable with, um, you know, a framework that is presenting the pandemic as a conspiracy”, and McDowell engages her in a spirited back-and-forth regarding this. Below the transcript, at the beginning of the “Thoughts on ‘Who Voted In Davos?’” comments, Simone writes:
This is important work, and a gift of researchable sites and sources. However, after fully digesting your information and recognizing the connections you make, I really very much wanted to hear what Naomi Klein could possibly say to argue against your points. Talking over her did harm to our cause, I think, undermining your authority as the mother and researcher and truth-tell you are, not to mention we lost the opportunity to allow one of these apologists to have enough ‘rope to hang themselves.’ They have no legitimacy and they will go too far, and we need to learn to stand firm, and quiet, and let them. This is a form of fighting as well.
To which McDowell responds:
You are certainly entitled to your opinion, however what you are not privy to was that this was a three-hour event where she provided wrap up of remarks after all five panelists presented. She did not mention the content I presented in her response and specifically excluded me in directing follow up questions. I had to be asked to be put on stack. Whenever I spoke she turned off her camera. She had the opportunity to respond, and she chose not to, because she is part of the group that is rolling out digital ID and everything I spoke about. I think it must have come as a shock how much I was able to share in fifteen minutes.
After the end of the part at Rutgers, from 16:56 on, McDowell describes more of her background and perspective on what is currently in process globally, providing a summary aspect of her cogent analyses (amplified throughout Wrench In The Gears) on Digital ID and Blockchain Identity. At the end of this (starts at 27:17) she refers to the below 2019 NAACP statement on risks of Blockchain Identity.
We just have to be really clear about these technologies. In that respect I collaborated on a resolution that was passed in California and later at the national meeting of the NAACP last summer in Detroit where they wrote a resolution saying that no one should be compelled to create a digital identity to access public benefits. That includes education, health care, housing, judicial involvement—no one should make you create a digital identity to access these things. It was unanimously passed with exception of some small group in Brooklyn that was looking to data mine kids in New York City schools.
   So that passed. That exists and there’s a model. So it’s not just random people saying this is a problem. It’s the NAACP looking at racial capitalism in the context of blockchain. But meanwhile currently in Chula Vista, California, which is an area of San Diego, students are being asked to give blood tests for Covid on Blockchain. Think about that. Essentially what we’re saying is that children, to have right of face-to-face education, are having their blood—bodily fluids—taken and uploaded to a blockchain health record. That is happening through their school district and no one’s talking about that yet. And nobody really knows about this Blockchain Resolution.
   When we talk about abolition, for me, I feel like this is the next Abolition Movement, is Blockchain Identity. Because if we agree to become data commodities with privacy to protect us from surveillance it’s over. I think that’s really important for people to know because no mainstream media is going to put that out and it’s not fake news because you can google it; they have the PDF of their 2019 resolutions online, it's page 62.
Resolution against Blockchain Identity passed by the NAACP in 2019, pages 62-63 of “RESOLUTIONS SUBMITTED UNDER ARTICLE IX, SECTION 1 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE NAACP 2019”:
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
1. Opposition to the Use of the Blockchain Identity

WHEREAS, Blockchain technologies are being developed as tools of digital identity management; and

WHEREAS, transaction data pertaining to vital records, voting, ownership, healthcare, professional and educational credentials, employment, and financial income can be stored on Blockchain systems; and

WHEREAS, global technology interests are placing heavy pressure on governments to scale Blockchain adoption as a financial tool within proposals to privatize public services, including Public-Private Partnerships (P3); and

WHEREAS, governmental interests are exploring the use of “smart contracts” on Blockchain as a means of delivering public benefits; and

WHEREAS, public benefits distributed via “smart contracts” can incorporate coded interventions that preference specific behavioral outcomes; and

WHEREAS, the use of “programmable money/digital currency” may undermine the ability of benefit recipients to make autonomous economic choices and indenture the future wealth of such populations; and

WHEREAS, aggregation of an individual’s public benefit data within a Blockchain identity system could exacerbate punitive profiling of recipients of services; and

WHEREAS, prototypes linking Blockchain systems to profit extraction through social impact investment initiatives have already been developed; and

WHEREAS, hundreds of billions of dollars have already been directed into social impact investments by the world’s most powerful individuals and financial institutions; and

WHEREAS, consolidation of personal data in Blockchain identity systems will position the global poor who receive benefits via smart contracts to become data backbones upon which “impact” metrics would rest, in effect amplifying investment wealth of elite investors on the backs of vulnerable communities; and

WHEREAS, researchers have warned of the harms of relying on Blockchain systems, given the immutable nature of the technology that would mean false data and/or embedded vulnerabilities would never fully be able to be reversed, remedied, redacted, nor deleted; and

WHEREAS, security flaws are already rampant in Blockchain systems that claim to be secure, leading to the compromised integrity of the systems, and to highly sensitive personal information being vulnerable to exploitation.

BE IT RESOLVED, that the NAACP opposes any state or federal legislation that would require an individual to create a Blockchain identity in order to receive any public services or benefits, including but not limited to education, healthcare, addiction treatment, behavioral health services, law enforcement, housing, and/or food and nutrition.

IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the NAACP will engage in community education efforts to communicate to the public about the structure, function, benefits and inherent risks of Blockchain technologies.

at 06:40

September 2020

August 2020

© Associated Press
Virus-linked hunger tied to 10,000 child deaths each month
One-month old Haboue Solange Boue, awaiting medical care for severe malnutrition, is held by her mother, Danssanin Lanizou, 30, at the feeding center of the main hospital in the town of Hounde, Tuy Province, in southwestern Burkina Faso on Thursday, June 11, 2020. With the markets closed because of coronavirus restrictions, her family sold fewer vegetables. Lanizou is too malnourished to nurse her. (AP Photo/Sam Mednick)
#6: Does wearing a mask do anything?, 6 Jun 2020
Governments around the world are enforcing facial coverings to prevent SARS-Cov-2 infection, but does the science support their use?
#5: Infection-Fatality Ratio Update, 23 May 2020
The more data we gather, the more obvious it becomes that early fatality rate estimates were MASSIVELY exaggerated
#4: “Why are so many healthcare workers dying?”, 27 Apr 2020
Media reports paint a picture of healthcare workers being hit very hard by the pandemic, but the statistics suggest otherwise
#3: Covid19 is 20x DEADLIER than the flu!, 11 Apr 2020
One of the buzz-stats doing the rounds says this novel virus is far more dangerous than influenza. Does the science hold up?
#2: “The Emergency Powers Will Only Last 2 years!”, 8 Apr 2020
Defenders of the Coronavirus Act claim the “extreme measures” are only temporary, but is that true?
#1: “Covid19 is having an unprecedented impact on ICUs”, 2 Apr 2020
The media claim this pandemic’s effect on hospitals around the world has never been seen before, but is that true?
“Lockdown only pushes the severe cases into the future – it will not prevent them”
—Prof. Johan Giesecke
Prof Giesecke from Sweden Lances it in the Lancet,” Keith Rushworth, Epidemiology Explained, 6 May 2020
The invisible pandemic,” Johan Giesecke, The Lancet, 5 May 2020
These facts have led me to the following conclusions. Everyone will be exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and most people will become infected. COVID-19 is spreading like wildfire in all countries, but we do not see it—it almost always spreads from younger people with no or weak symptoms to other people who will also have mild symptoms. This is the real pandemic, but it goes on beneath the surface, and is probably at its peak now in many European countries. There is very little we can do to prevent this spread: a lockdown might delay severe cases for a while, but once restrictions are eased, cases will reappear. I expect that when we count the number of deaths from COVID-19 in each country in 1 year from now, the figures will be similar, regardless of measures taken.

Measures to flatten the curve might have an effect, but a lockdown only pushes the severe cases into the future—it will not prevent them. Admittedly, countries have managed to slow down spread so as not to overburden health-care systems, and, yes, effective drugs that save lives might soon be developed, but this pandemic is swift, and those drugs have to be developed, tested, and marketed quickly. Much hope is put in vaccines, but they will take time, and with the unclear protective immunological response to infection, it is not certain that vaccines will be very effective.

In summary, COVID-19 is a disease that is highly infectious and spreads rapidly through society. It is often quite symptomless and might pass unnoticed, but it also causes severe disease, and even death, in a proportion of the population, and our most important task is not to stop spread, which is all but futile, but to concentrate on giving the unfortunate victims optimal care.

April 2020


Wrench in the Gears, 19 Apr 2020
A Skeptical Parent’s Thoughts on Digital Curriculum
Vaccines will be the bread and butter for impact investors; but then factor in the crushing human and economic costs of global pandemic, and suddenly you’re talking REAL money. Imagine tallying up ALL the costs associated with the Covid-19 lockdown. That is going to create one ENORMOUS cost offset for investors moving forward. The longer the lockdown the bigger the cost offset they will be able to use in “pay for success” pandemic deals. For this first round there is a certain sick market logic in making the situation as dire as possible. Future profits are riding on calculations of harm that are being tallied now.


Wrench in the Gears, 17 May 2020
A Skeptical Parent’s Thoughts on Digital Curriculum
Bloomberg and the technocrats have been very diligent in their cooptation of the non-profit / third sector, creating systems of data extraction cloaked in the benevolent trappings of cardboard checks and glittering galas. Global health has been the focus of much subterfuge. Gates and Bloomberg united to tackle tobacco use, family planning, polio, and most recently “economic mobility.” All, of course, are impact investment markets.
It is worth noting that Event 201, the corona virus tabletop exercise held at the Pierre Hotel in New York last October, was a joint enterprise of the Gates Foundation and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, an initiative of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of public health.
Within the school of public health is the Center for Health Security that hosted both pandemic simulations – Clade-X in 2018 and Event 201 in 2019. The program is also a partner in the Global Health Security Index, an effort of the Nuclear Threat Initiative. Ted Turner, a founding director of the United Nations Foundation and another member of “The Good Club” started the Nuclear Threat Initiative.
During Bloomberg’s time on the Johns Hopkins board he developed a collaborative relationship with faculty around issues of public health and eventually became know as the “public health” mayor. New York was his test bed, and over the past fifteen years Bloomberg Philanthropies has poured hundreds of millions of dollars into tobacco control, obesity, and gun control.

Pre-2020

  
Universal Biometric ID

Wrench in the Gears, 19 Apr 2020
A Skeptical Parent’s Thoughts on Digital Curriculum
A glance over the participant list shows high-level executives from Edelman (public relations) and NBC Universal; George Gao, director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention; as well as a number of groups, including Johnson and Johnson and GAVI, that have a stake in vaccine trials underway. While the event was held in New York, there were also participants representing Australia, Canada, Switzerland, China, and the United Nations.


   Efficacy of Ivermectin, HCQ, and Other Repurposed Drugs
Ivermectin Go-To Sources
Top Reads / Views
Who benefits by claiming early use of HCQ is not efficacious and harmful?
Dynamically updated reference sites

c19study.com
COVID-19 studies for:  HCQ  Vitamin D  Ivermectin  LY-CoV  REGN-COV2  Remdesivir


hcqtrial.com
Mark Crispin Miller: Why the left should oppose lockdown (and would, if it really were devoted to the interests of the underclass), News From Underground, 10 Jul 2020
Today’s “left” has not opposed lockdowns because it’s not really “left” at all, but just another outlet for the COVID-19 propaganda, as it’s long since been corrupted by the CIA funds poured into it through pass-throughs like the Ford Foundation.

For example: Amy Goodman started today’s “Democracy Now!” with a gloating bit on the now-infected Jair Bolsonaro, who had “for months downplayed the severity of the crisis,” lately developing “a high fever and a cough”—and taking hydroxychloroquine, “even though it’s been proven ineffective against COVID-19, and sometimes deadly.”

Thus Amy Goodman serves as a prolific vector of the propaganda hatched by the Big Pharma/WHO/Gates/Fauci syndicate, to denigrate HCQ—a cheap and most effective COVID-19 treatment, as has been “proven” all around the world—so as to set the stage for that vaccine.

What authentic leftist would thus prostitute herself, and lie baldly, and repeatedly, about a treatment that’s demonstrably been saving lives—including many of those black lives so dear to Amy Goodman—in favor of a rushed vaccine, that’s now being tested on poor people in Brazil, South Africa, and other Third World countries?

If Eugene Victor Debs had been a “leftist” like the amply funded Amy Goodman, he would have been out giving speeches on “the rape of Belgium” by “the Huns,” and urging workers to enlist in Woodrow Wilson’s “war to end all wars,” instead of bravely speaking out against it, and going to federal prison for it.

Amy Goodman is, in short, a lethal fraud, like countless other “leftists” who should have been opposing the disastrous lockdown policies, for all the reasons that Phil Shannon sets forth here.

To see who’s funding Amy and her fellow “leftist” stars, check out this chart (click to view full size):

The source for this was first published in 2002: Additional sections were added in the next few years and by 2006 the collection reached completion with the addition of a 2-page flyer.
In 2007 Bob Feldman published the following: Abstract
Left media and left think tank staff people generally deny that the acceptance by their organizations of grants from liberal foundations has transformed their organizational priorities, subjected them to elite control, or channeled their energies into safe, legalistic, bureaucratic activities and mild reformism. In this report, we will be discussing organizations, e.g., Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), North American Congress on Latin America (NACLA), Middle East Research & Information Project (MERIP), Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR); and media, e.g., Nation, Progressive, Mother Jones, In Th ese Times, widely regarded as left-wing. Some originated in the 1960s and 1970s with bold challenges to the United States political and economic system; we can read (some are online) their early publications and mission statements to be reminded of the initial militancy. In the popular mind, these media and think tanks are clearly distinguished from, on the one hand, the liberal media, e.g., New York Times, Harper’s, and think tanks, e.g., Brookings Institution, Urban Institute, and on the other, the “far” left, e.g., Workers’ World, Maoist Internationalist Movement. A few of the left-wing organizations are primarily concerned about threats to media independence, yet all their attention is focused on for-profit corporate (or government) control; they ignore the possible influence of large subventions from non-profit institutions such as foundations.
Conclusion
This is report has shown that organizations and media generally considered left-wing have in recent years received substantial funding from liberal foundations. This information alone is significant, as left activists and scholars are either unaware of or uninterested in examining the nature and consequences of such financing. Furthermore, although a definitive evaluation would require a massive content analysis project, there is much evi-dence that the funded left has moved towards the mainstream as it has increased its dependence on foundations. This is shown by the “progressive,” reformist tone of formerly radical organizations; the gradual disappearance of challenges to the economic and political power of corporations or United States militarism and imperialism; and silence on the relationship of liberal foundations to either politics and culture in general, or to their own organizations. Critiquing right wing foundations, media, and think tanks may be fair game, but to explain our current situation, or to discover what has happened to the left, a more inclusive investigation is needed.

   Resistance ≠ Futile    

Mission Statement & Principles

Millions Against Medical Mandates is a solution-based think tank of organizations and individuals invested in and working for freedom from mandated and coerced medical interventions. Our coalition partners include individuals in the fields of medicine, health, science, law, journalism, publishing, business, politics, activism, education, medically injured adults and children, and families of the medically injured — all of whom support informed consent and individual choice.

_______________________________________

We the undersigned, work to end medical tyranny, promote true health, return to sound ethics, and we collectively uphold the following principles:

  • Medical mandates have no place in a free society as the international standard of informed consent in medical procedures has been established. Vaccine mandates violate prior, free, and informed consent.
  • Current profit-based research and policy model must give way to medical decision-making guided by sound, independent research.
  • We must restore the 7th Amendment rights of Americans to bring civil litigation against vaccine makers for vaccine injury due to defectively designed products.
  • Medical legislation and policy must be guided by informed consent principles and medical choice.
  • Corruption and fraud in medicine should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law including piercing the corporate veil, incarceration, compensatory and punitive damages.
  • Public health goals must be based on overall wellness outcomes in individuals and populations.
  • Public health agencies and the medical industry must recognize and address the modern epidemics of developmental disabilities, chronic illnesses and metabolic dysfunctions and their iatrogenic causes.
  • We must end censorship of free discussion of medical controversies as well as discrimination against those making medical choices that diverge from the medical consensus: in society, all forms of media, and in the courts.
  • Medically injured individuals and populations, their advocates, and those invested in freedom from medical mandates must be included in health policy-making at the federal and state level.
  • Coalition members maintain zero tolerance for violent rhetoric or violent behavior of any sort.
  • Coalition members must strive to work together with integrity to end medical tyranny globally
Promotes a collection of works created by children who
lost their rights to a public education. They have suffered,
they have cried, yet they have persevered! They are talented,
creative, HEALTHY and most of all, THEY ARE WIDE AWAKE!

Poem By 16 Year old, Luca

No

I walked home from school today
Feeling a rather confused way
We stood in an orderly line
For something they said was fine

I have always been told
By people young and very old
That we people have the right to choose
Without fear of anything we might lose

I walked home from school today
Feeling a rather confused way
If we can choose what we do
Why must I walk home at ten past two

At the end of the line there stood a man
With a coat of white and hue of tan
He held something in his palm
And told me to remain calm

I walked home from school today
Feeling a rather confused way
For I knew what it was he held
And with my knowledge I rebelled

I said a word so shockingly sound
That it hit the man with an audible pound
A word he seemed to have never heard
The world around me became all blurred

“No”

My teacher turned with a frightening face
The doctor looked slightly out of pace
My classmates swarmed around like flies
And asked the operative question “why”

I told them that there was a choice
Me and my parents had sent an invoice
The doctor was hearing none of my speech
And with that my freedom he did impeach

I walked home from school today
Feeling a rather confused way
Why should we be refused to grow
For having the courage to say “No”
Covid19 Q and A
Sixteen Simple Answers to the Top Questions
Keith Rushworth 6 May 2020
1 My Husband and I made love last night. I read in the Daily Mirror that we should have worn masks, but we didn’t. Will we die?
Yes you will. But not of Covid19.
2 My Granddad is 93. He has diabetes, dementia, and heart issues and lives in a care home. What is his life expectancy with this deadly virus around?
About the same.
3 Is Boris Johnson able to run the country properly without Parliament sitting in the normal way?
This is a silly question. Our MP’s are happy to sit at home being paid for running the country. Boris’s ability is not an issue, since Dominic Cummings runs the country.
4 My Husband has committed suicide due to the lockdown. He was 25. I am left with a small daughter. Can I claim against the Government for causing his death?
Don’t be silly.
5 The epidemic seems to be running down everywhere. If the vaccine is not ready until it’s over, will I still need the vaccine?
Definitely.
6 Will the vaccine be dangerous, given that there will have been so little time to produce and safety test it?
Of course.
7 I understand that the Government is taking on billions of debt in order to fund the lockdown. How will they repay it?
Raise your taxes, cut your services, and possibly sell off the NHS to American Corporations.
8 I understand that children are virtually immune from the virus. But now that schools might reopen, I worry that my little boy might die as a result of going to school. Is that possible?
It certainly is. He could be run over by a bus.
9 Is it true that people used to die before Covid19 appeared? I never remember the BBC reporting deaths like they do now.
There is some scientific research showing that people did die before Covid19, but none of it has been peer reviewed. I seem to remember a huge number died in the Iraq War, but they were all foreigners.
10 I understand that there are still travel restrictions between different countries, even when the countries concerned both have the virus. Does this make sense?
Yes. For example, if you are French you are more likely to die of English Covid, and if you are English you have an estimated 30 times higher risk of death from garlicky French Covid.
11 The Swedes didn’t have a lockdown. Are they all dead now?
Of course. Stockholm is now for sale on Rightmove.
12 How can we be so certain that the Chinese lie about their deaths and other things, while our own Government does not?
I’m getting tired of answering such idiot questions. Even the Duke of Edinburgh knew the answer to that in the 1980’s when he pointed out that the Chinese have slitty eyes.
13 I’ve heard it said that the docility of the British public in the face of lockdown is equivalent to a Sloth on Valium. Do you agree?
What dose of Valium is the Sloth on?
14 Will the Government give us back all our Human Rights when this is over?
Dream on.
15 It has been 12 years since the 2008 bank collapse, and we have not fully recovered. Will it take another twelve years to recover from the lockdown collapse? I don’t like to be a pessimist.
I know how you feel. But there is this wretched thing called Reality.
16 I feel really, really scared of the Coronavirus. Is there a cure?
Stop watching TV News.
Study claiming that asymptomatic people can transmit the new coronavirus was “flawed” (to put it mildly)—from an article that came out on FEBRUARY 3rd!
newsfromunderground, 3 May 2020: Here we all are under house arrest, with healthy people quarantined, and, when they creep out into the desolated world, ordered to wear masks and stay six feet apart—all because of a botched “study” that was expertly refuted three months ago.
This is beyond outrageous. How many people have now died, or will die in this new Great Depression, because of that junk science?
And—even more important—what will it now take to make this known? Since Il Fauci surely won’t retract his ringing affirmation of that work (“This study lays the question [of asymptomatic transmission] to rest”) “our free press” won’t report it, nor are the proprietors of “social media” likely to enable, or allow, its circulation.
So it is up to us, we angry few, to spread the word. Please send this email far and wide.
MCM
Germans repatriated from Wuhan, China, arrive at an army barracks on 1 February to be examined for signs of infection with the new coronavirus. FRANK RUMPENHORST/PICTURE-ALLIANCE/DPA/AP IMAGES
Study claiming new coronavirus can be transmitted by people without symptoms was flawed
By Kai Kupferschmidt Feb. 3, 2020, 5:30 PM

A paper published on 30 January in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) about the first four people in Germany infected with a novel coronavirus made many headlines because it seemed to confirm what public health experts feared: that someone who has no symptoms from infection with the virus, named 2019-nCoV, can still transmit it to others. That might make controlling the virus much harder.

Chinese researchers had previously suggested asymptomatic people might transmit the virus but had not presented clear-cut evidence. “There’s no doubt after reading [the NEJM] paper that asymptomatic transmission is occurring,” Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told journalists. “This study lays the question to rest.”

But now, it turns out that information was wrong. The Robert Koch Institute (RKI), the German government’s public health agency, has written a letter to NEJM to set the record straight, even though it was not involved in the paper.

Read the rest.


Keith Rushworth: Epidemiology Explained
Why the Science behind Lockdown is Wrong
Off Guardian
14 Apr: 50 Headlines: Welcome to the “new normal” 25 Apr: 50 Headlines Darker: More of the “New Normal”
COVID-19 Civic Freedom Tracker
Keep Civic Space Healthy
International Center for Not-For-Profit Law (ICNL)
This tracker monitors government responses to the pandemic that affect civic freedoms and human rights, focusing on emergency laws.

“Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed; everything else is public relations.”
—George Orwell
Uwe Alschner: Kategorie: SARS-Corona 2
Vitalstoff.Blog, Das Blog über Prävention und Mikronährstoffe

   Evolving Situation    
The art of the smear: How Buzzfeed and other propaganda mills “debunk” those questioning the Official Narrative of COVID-19
As “our free press” ramps up its loyal service as Big Pharma’s Ministry of Truth, it’s doing an ever cruder version of the Propaganda Two-Step, which you perform by pumping out Big Lies non-stop, while also blacking out and/or defaming anyone who dares to contradict or question them.
We have an excellent example of the latter tactic in this wad of excrement from Buzzfeed, hurled at six “spin doctors” (i.e., dissident physicians), two “5G conspiracy theorists,” and two of “the misquoted” (two doctors whom Buzzfeed’s minions couldn’t find a way to tar outright).
What makes it such a good example is the blatancy of its key features. Note, first, that it does not even address, much less refute, any of the information offered, and/or arguments presented, by the heretics. Instead of actually rebutting what they’ve said or written, this hit-piece (along with countless others) smears the heretics themselves, with mere insulting epithets and vicious mockery.
Such propaganda must rely primarily on slander and derision, because what those dissidents have said, about COVID-19 and/or 5G, is either true or highly plausible—which means that the Official Narratives in question are untenable. This is why such hit-pieces are so nakedly authoritarian, “debunking” its targets just by telling us “what the authorities have said.”
Thus this piece baldly tells its readers what to think (or, rather, what to feel, since there’s no thought involved), and how to serve as individual vectors of the propaganda; and so it isn’t just a catalogue of smears, concocted to discourage anyone from looking into what those targeted have had to say. It also functions as a sort of script, providing Buzzfeed’s followers with ammo to be used on “social media,” and/or in fights with any infidels among their friends or family.
Although the number, unanimity and virulence of such attacks is something new (and grounds for seeing it as a sign of desperation), the basic strategy is over half-a-century old, as it was the CIA that first weaponized the epithet “conspiracy theorist” back in 1967, in its memo #1035-960, sent out to CIA station chiefs worldwide to enlist their help in smearing critics of the Warren Report, not just by calling them “conspiracy theorists,” but also by deploying one or more of several (what we would call) talking points against them.
What we’re seeing today is a streamlining of that process. Whereas, back then, the CIA encouraged its media assets to defame those questioning the Official Narrative (of JFK’s assassination), so that readers would then doubt the honesty or sanity of those dissenters. Today, the culture having largely moved online, the propaganda aims directly at its audience, inviting them to spread its toxin all throughout the tissues of the nation, by parroting the memes of the Official Narrative (of COVID-19, 5G, vaccination and whatever else the powers behind the propaganda want the rest of us swallow).
Here, for your convenience and enlightenment, is a list of dissidents re: COVID-19, its origins, and/or the policies and practices now being used to “cure” it. This is just a start on such a list of medical professionals. Nor do I necessarily agree with everything those listed here have either said or written—but they have every right to speak their piece, and those of us who care to know what’s really going should give them a fair hearing, and think about it for ourselves.
John Ioannidis
Knut Wittkowski
David L. Katz
Rashid Bhuttar
Dan Erickson
Artin Massihi
Dolores Cahill
Sunetra Gupta
Didier Raoult
Luc Montagnier
Meryl Nass
Cameron Kyle-Sidell
Wolfgang Wodarg
Judy Mikovits
Andrew Kaufman
Andrea Crisanti
Russell Blaylock
Rashid A Buttar
Sherri Tenpenny
Gary Nepute
Gary Null
Richard Gale
Joseph Mercola
Johan Giesecke
Anders Tegnell
David Starkey

These Are The Fake Experts Pushing Pseudoscience And Conspiracy Theories About The Coronavirus Pandemic
A guide to the spin doctors and conspiracy theorists clogging up your social media feed.


He Saw ‘No Proof’ Closures Would Curb Virus.
Now He Has De Blasio’s Trust.

Rashbaum, W.K., et al., New York Times, 14 May 2020
Public Hospital System CEO Says Natural Immunity Will Defeat Coronavirus
Dr. Mitchell Katz President and Chief Executive Officer of NYC Health + Hospitals, the largest municipal health system in the United States, with 11 acute care hospitals, 5 skilled nursing facilities, dozens of community health centers, a home care agency and an insurance plan, MetroPlus Health.
https://www.nychealthandhospitals.org/leadership/dr-mitchell-katz/
I titled the talk tonight, Are You Scared Yet? I did that, despite the fact that Jane Hunter has said, in one interview at least, that my lectures are like drugs in the sixties in that they paralyze people with fear and make them inactive. That’s not anything I’ve ever heard from an audience but it’s what she said about me. I think, in fact, my message, when read properly is more that people should calm down and try to distinguish what they’re being asked, or told, to be afraid of and what they ought to be afraid in reality which is generally hidden from them and the extent to which they ought to be afraid or ought to act instead.

I also knew a guy years ago when I worked in the anti-psychiatry movement, John Parkin, who said that he wanted to start a national campaign to abolish paranoia by elevating it to realistic fear. There isn’t a term in the English language that’s the opposite of paranoia, unless it’s just complacency. But there isn’t healthy or realistic fear that maybe somebody is doing something to you. William S. Burroughs said, that paranoia is having all the facts. So I try to get as many as I can, ’cause I’m trying to get there.

But my purpose, of course, isn’t to make other people paranoid. My purpose is to hopefully enlighten people about what’s happening around them and what they ought to be putting their focus on. Charlie Manson said, paranoia is heightened awareness. Michael McClure said that even paranoids have enemies. I know I have some. But I don’t spend my life looking over my shoulder, I try to look in front of me and see what’s coming.

John Judge, “Are You Scared Yet? The War Without an Enemy
Terrorism and the Strategy of Tension
,”

Santa Monica, California, 1996
   VACCINE EFFECTS    


Global vaccine market, slide 3
PATH (Program for Appropriate Technology in Health), Mar 2016
Wrench in the Gears, 19 Apr 2020
A Skeptical Parent’s Thoughts on Digital Curriculum
Pay for success finance deals will be well served by the global vaccine market that is being advanced through Gates’s outfit GAVI. Vaccine doses are readily quantifiable, and the economic costs of many illnesses are straightforward to calculate. With a few strategic grants awarded to prestigious universities and think tanks, I anticipate suitable equations framing out a healthy ROI (return on investment) will be devised to meet global market demands shortly.

Experimental COVID Post-Vaccination Adverse Events & Deaths. Coincidences?
Kathy Dopp, MS Mathematics, ongoing compilation
(UPDATED) Exclusive Summary: Covid-19 Vaccine Concerns,” Sharyl Attikisson, sharylattkisson.com, 17 Oct 2021
‘Unnecessary, misleading, catastrophic’: Senior European physicians co-author expert statement on COVID vaccine for children,” posted at America’s Frontline Doctors, 21 Jul 2021
U.S. Sen. Johnson Holds News Conference With Families Injured by COVID Vaccines, Ignored by Medical Community,” Megan Redshaw, The Defender, 29 Jun 2021
Preventing Vaccine Mandates,” Children’s Health Defense eBook Toolkit, 21 Jun 2021 (pp. 46)
Information and resources to assist you in opposing vaccine mandates that are likely being considered in your state’s legislature.
Majority of Physicians Decline COVID Shots, according to Survey, Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, 16 Jun 2021
Other Reasons Physicians Unvaccinated - 161 Physicians comments about other reasons they are unvaccinated
Are the Covid-19 vaccines “safe and effective”,” Steve Kirsch, TrialSite News, 16 Jun 2021
COVID-19 Vaccines and Children: A Scientist’s Guide for Parents, Dr. Byram W. Bridle, Canadian Covid Care Alliance, 15 Jun 2021 (pp. 202)
‘Urgent’ British report calls for complete cessation of COVID vaccines in humans,” Americas Frontline Doctors, Jun 2021
Urgent Preliminary Yellow Card Report on Data up to 26 May 2021, The Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd, 9 Jun 2021
Vaccine Casualties: Is the CDC Hiding the Real Numbers?,” Tea Lynn Moore and Dale Hawkins, Druthers, 3 Jun 2021
“Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.
Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS), Harvard Med School report to US Dept of Health and Human Services, 2010
The Spike Protein - Dr. Byram Bridle Professor of Viral Immunology University of Guelph: “We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.” (8:16) 27 May 2021
Vaccine researcher admits ’big mistake,’ says spike protein is dangerous ‘toxin’, Celeste McGovern, Lifesite News, 31 May 2021
Pfizer Japanese government study
https://www.pmda.go.jp/drugs/2021/P20210212001/672212000_30300AMX00231_I100_1.pdf
English Translation access:
https://twitter.com/dankdly111/status/1398843173225566211
23 page translation:
SARS-COV-2 mRNA Vaccine (BNT162, PF-07302048) 2.6.4
Overview of Pharmacokinetic Test

https://files.catbox.moe/0vwcmj.pdf
Dr Bridle University Page
Audio Source
The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein alters barrier function in 2D static and 3D microfluidic in-vitro models of the human blood-brain barrier
Dec 2020
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33053430/
Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients
20 May 2021
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075
Roxana Bruno, Peter A. McCullough, Teresa Forcades I Vila, et al. SARS-CoV-2 mass vaccination: Urgent questions on vaccine safety that demand answers from international health agencies, regulatory authorities, governments and vaccine developers, Authorea, 24 May 2021, DOI: 10.22541/au.162136772.22862058/v2
Challenge Issued, The Ball is Now In Premier Ford's Court
Univ. of Guelph Ontario’s Dr's Are Challenging Premier Ford and His Medical Expert Team to a Public Debate.

Special Guest: ByramW. Bridle, PhD, Associate Professor of Viral Immunology
film (1:29:59), 23 Apr 2021
There is a lot of emerging safety data that is worth talking about revolving around inoculations, masking and physical distancing. We will be joined by special guest Dr Byram Bridle, an Associate Professor of Viral Immunology at the University of Guelph Ontario. You likely know that the University has issued a public debate challenge to Premier Ford and his medical staff.
We hope by hosting this that we can help to encourage a larger number of Canadians to engage in awareness of this opportunity, and thereby create a significant public demand for meaningful discourse with elected officials.
Dr Bridle states that he is particularly passionate about effects of isolation policies on children. We will hear from Dr Bridle how this initiative came about, the objectives they hope to reach, and the reception they expect from the public and the establishment.

No Jab For Me Statements in this site are substantiated with facts that will stand in a court of law. Informed Consent requires a flow of information. Click on the hyperlinked sections to direct you to primary sources such as CDC, WHO, FDA documents.

  
This was on https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DczVUPjOli3J4rHHtvRzh94NVT74x0kM/view at least through April 21. Then it was censored/deleted.
Informed Consent Matters
Updated April 22, 2021 (pp. 141)
Now it's being updated at covidvaccinereactions.com inside https://covidvaccinereactions.com/downloads/ (local copy)
It is everyone’s right to review the first-hand testimonies of the covid vaccine adverse reacti