back to rat haus | Index | Search | tree
Pandemic Parallax View
parallax [par-uh-laks] noun: the apparent displacement
of an observed object due to a change in the position of the observer

Gall-Peters Projection of Mother Earth
‘People in power lie’, my father once told me.... [T]he more enduring tragedy, arguably, is that we cannot trust our news media to tell us the truth about vital health issues when advertising dollars are at stake. You scratch your head and wonder how all those Trump supporters don’t share your indignation at President Trump’s mendacity. One answer is that they are disheartened by once-trusted media outlets who have also set the precedent of routinely lying and violating the public trust, wounding in the process our democracy, public faith in critical institutions, and the health of our children.”
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., “Flu Misinformation and Coronavirus Fears: My Letter to Dr. Sanjay Gupta,” Children’s Health Defense, 16 Apr 2020
“These prevalence estimates represent a range between 48,000 and 81,000 people infected in Santa Clara County by early April, 50-85-fold more than the number of confirmed cases. Conclusions: The population prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Santa Clara County implies that the infection is much more widespread than indicated by the number of confirmed cases. Population prevalence estimates can now be used to calibrate epidemic and mortality projections.”
—Bendavid, Mulaney, et al, “COVID-19 Antibody Seroprevalence in Santa Clara County, California,” doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.14.20062463, 11 Apr 2020
“That [Feb 2020] letter [to the Lancet] was ostensibly to show solidarity with the workers in Wuhan, but it also had a phrase denouncing the conspiracy theories as to the non-natural origin of the pandemic. And again, it was an attempt to shut down debate. To me, that’s totally antithetical to the scientific process. The scientific process should welcome scrutiny and debate on serious questions like this, and then you have a hypothesis, and you break the hypothesis, and you produce evidence and reasonable argument. They attempted to short-circuit all of that by saying, ‘This is conspiracy stuff.”
Sam Husseini, Episode 7: Perspectives on the Pandemic, 7 May 2020
Contents
Living is easy with eyes closed
Misunderstanding all you see
It’s getting hard to be someone
But it all works out
John Lennon             
Strawberry Fields Forever
                                                                     

12 Dec 2018: Bill Gates heads to a workshop on global health at the NIH with (left) National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci and NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins (right).
  Interviews   
Films / Videos
Critical Analysis
Resistance ≠ Futile
Evolving Situation
Vaccine Effects
Last Updated: 11:11 AM EDT 24 May 2020
Swiss Propaganda Research
Facts about Covid-19
Regular Updates on Medical and Political Developments
Fully referenced facts about Covid-19, provided by experts in the field,
to help our readers make a realistic risk assessment.
“The only means to fight the plague is honesty.”
—Albert Camus, The Plague (1947)
   INTERVIEWS    
Perspectives on the Pandemic
The Press & The Public Project
  • Episode 8: The Monopoly Edition with author Matt Stoller
  • Episode 7: A Conversation with Investigative Journalist Sam Husseini
  • Episode 6: A Conversation with Dr. Dan Erickson & Dr. Artin Massihi
  • Episode 5: A Conversation with Dr. Knut Wittkowski, PhD
  • Episode 4: Update with Dr. John Ioannidis
  • Episode 3: A Conversation with Dr. David L Katz concerning “Total Harm Minimization”
  • Episode 2: A Conversation with Knut Wittkowski, PhD
  • Episode 1: A Conversation with Dr. John Ioannidis, Stanford University
Episode 8: The Monopoly Edition with author Matt Stoller (1:09:28, mp3), interviewed by John Kirby, Washington, D.C., May 7th, 2020
In this “monopoly edition” of Perspectives, Matt Stoller, author of Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy, forecasts the actual amount of the Wall Street bailout; the coming disappearance of most small business; the problems that emerge when monopolies control health care; the emergence of a Wall Street-oriented “planned economy”; the failure of progressives to stop the theft of trillions, and much more.
Episode 7: A Conversation with Investigative Journalist Sam Husseini (59:54, mp3), interviewed by John Kirby & Libby Handros, Riverdale, Maryland, May 7th, 2020
Investigative journalist Sam Husseini has had a storied career asking world leaders questions they would prefer to dodge, on subjects ranging from missing weapons of mass destruction to very real nuclear stockpiles. Now he takes on the "elephant in the room": the extreme dangers posed by bio-research facilities not just in China, but all over the world...
[0:27:40]
Husseini: That [Feb 2020] letter [to the Lancet] was ostensibly to show solidarity with the workers in Wuhan, but it also had a phrase denouncing the conspiracy theories as to the non-natural origin of the pandemic. And again, it was an attempt to shut down debate. To me, that’s totally antithetical to the scientific process. The scientific process should welcome scrutiny and debate on serious questions like this, and then you have a hypothesis, and you break the hypothesis, and you produce evidence and reasonable argument. They attempted to short-circuit all of that by saying, ‘This is conspiracy stuff.’
Episode 6: A Conversation with Dr. Dan Erickson & Dr. Artin Massihi (47:17, mp3), interviewed by John Kirby, Bakersfield, California, April 28th, 2020; Translation: German transcript
When Dr. Dan Erickson and Dr. Artin Massihi held a press conference on April 22nd about the results of testing they conducted at their urgent care facilities around Bakersfield, California, the video, uploaded by a local ABC news affiliate, went viral. After reaching five million views, YouTube took it down on the grounds that it “violated community standards.” We followed up with the doctors to determine what was so dangerous about their message. What we discovered were reasonable and well-meaning professionals whose voices should be heard.
Episode 5: A Conversation with Dr. Knut Wittkowski, PhD (1:12:58, mp3), interviewed by John Kirby, Stanford Univ., 17 April 2020; Translation: German transcript
Knut Wittkowski states his initial claim has been vindicated: The lockdowns—always a dubious proposition for a respiratory virus—came too late in the U.S. and elsewhere, and were therefore not effective or useful. By turns emotional and darkly comic, Wittkowski ranges across all the essential topics of the crisis, and gives answers unlikely to be reflected in major media.
[0:26:39]
WITTKOWSKI: What you should do, however, and what was not done in the United States, is to protect the elderly. From the experience in Italy, we already knew that the vast majority of people who die are people in their 70’s, 80’s and 90’s who have comorbidities. So that was nothing new when it also happened in Seattle. We had the very early experience, in Seattle, of a couple of people, old people with comorbidities, dying in a nursing home. At that point in time, one should have isolated at least the nursing homes. Pay the nurses and everybody working there overtime so that they can stay there for three or four weeks. Sorry, my voice is breaking because I think that is a tragedy. This opportunity was missed. Instead, people were isolating the children, who are not at risk at all.
You still don’t really know whether children are infected or not, and if they are infected, they never, or virtually never, develop a phenotype. To isolate those who are not at risk, and put those at risk who are at risk, is a catastrophe. It’s a human catastrophe that should never, ever have happened. And if people say they don’t have money for that, for 2 trillion dollars you can pay a lot of overtime. You could have made all of these people millionaires, and there would be a lot of money left, and we would have really protected the virus from getting into the nursing homes and killing those who are the most vulnerable.
KIRBY: All we’ve really done, you’re suggesting, in addition to not adequately protecting the old, we have slowed the spread of herd immunity.
WITTKOWSKI: Yes. And that means we have increased the risk of the elderly to become infected. Because you cannot isolate yourself for extended periods of time. Isolation for a short period of time is easy. But for a long period of time, it’s just human—the grandparents want to see their grandchildren.
Episode 4: Update with Dr. John Ioannidis (1:12:58, mp3), interviewed by John Kirby, Stanford Univ., 17 April 2020, Translation: German transcript
Dr. John Ioannidis discusses the results of three preliminary studies, (including his latest showing a drastically reduced infection fatality rate); the worrisome effects of the lockdown; the Swedish approach; the Italian data; the ups and downs of testing; the feasibility of "contact tracing", and more. Dr. Ioannidis does not have a political agenda, nor does he favor making money over saving lives. He is simply the best respected epidemiologist and meta-statistician in the world. And his latest preliminary serology study shows that many more of us have had this than we realize—50-85 times more of us—and therefore the “infection fatality rate” is equivalent to seasonal flu. The work of Dr Ioannidis is part of a growing army of data, including the revised estimates of Imperial College and the CDC, (not to mention the original work of Dr. Fauci himself), that make that conclusion clear.
Episode 3: A Conversation with Dr. David L Katz concerning “Total Harm Minimization”, interviewed by John Kirby and Libby Handros, Hamden, CT, April 9, 2020
John Kirby talks with Dr. David L. Katz, the author of the much-debated March 20th New York Times op-ed, “Is Our Fight Against the Coronavirus Worse Than the Disease?” Dr. Katz discusses his proposal for “total harm minimization,” a plan that seeks to protect people both from Covid-19 and the host of ills that result from social isolation and economic shut-down.
Episode 2: A Conversation with Knut Wittkowski, PhD, interviewed by John Kirby, Libby Handros and Lee Davis, NYC April 1&2, 2020, Translation: German transcript
Prof Knut Wittkowski, for 20 years head of Rockefeller Univ’s Dept of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design, says social distancing and lockdown is the worst way to deal with an airborne respiratory virus and offers data showing China and South Korea had already reached their peak number of cases when they instituted containment measures. In other words, nature had already-or-nearly achieved, herd immunity. Prof Wittkowski urges schools open now so the virus may spread harmlessly among the young, and thus shorten the amount of time elderly and immune compromised must be sequestered. Our current course, he warns, will only prolong the crisis and likely guarantee a “second wave” of infections in the Fall.
The first three months of the COVID-19 epidemic: Epidemiological evidence for two separate strains of SARS-CoV-2 viruses spreading and implications for prevention strategies - Two epidemics of COVID-19, Knut Wittkowski, Asdera LLC, New York, NY (work-in-process)
Episode 1: A Conversation with Dr. John Ioannidis, Stanford University, (1:02:46, video, mp3) inteviewed by John Kirby, 25 Mar 2020
Dr. John P.A. Ioannidis is C.F. Rehnborg Chair in Disease Prevention, Professor of Medicine, of Health and Research Policy, of Biomedical Data Science, and of Statistics, and is the Co-Director of the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford. He cautions we do not have reliable data to make long-term decisions about COVID-19 and an extended lockdown might have far graver effects than the disease itself.
A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data,” Dr. Ioannidis, STAT, 17 Mar 2020

Debunking the COVID-19 Narrative with Prof. Dolores Cahill (1:06:44, mp3) 21st Century Wire, 13 May 2020
Are public health officials and the mainstream media really telling the public scientific accurate and correct information about the Coronavirus and treatment for COVID-19? Was there any scientific or medical basis for governments to impose a lockdown? Are the government-media complex irresponsibly spreading misinformation about COVID-19? Is this misinformation harming the public and causing needless suffering and additional deaths? Apparently, yes.
Computing Forever speaks with Professor Dolores Cahill an experienced biological scientist with over 25 years expertise in high-throughput protein array, antibody array, and proteomics technology development. Dr. Cahill is a scientist with a heroic sense of ethical responsibility. She dismantles many of the popular assumptions about Coronavirus repeated by politicians and public health officials.
Trying to stay “safe” is nowhere near as important as trying to stay HUMAN
This is the new morphing of Trump hatred, the new way to pretend to be murdered by Trump, and get love from all your friends, who never heard of Lynn Margulis, and who think Fauci is a savior, as opposed to a mobster. He's not a scientist. I know what a scientist is, what a scientist sounds like. They don't accuse people of murder, for one thing.
I'm angry too.
But as is always the case, their anger has the wheel and mine is an oppressed minority.
Today, I tweeted this:
Covid is code for de-humanization on an industrial scale. It is rooted in the little scorpion we once called “political correctness” which stripped out humanistic moral code and replaced it with militant stances. Millennials the target generation. The offer: “No need to FEEL.”
Fake News and Real Lies – Who Needs Conspiracy Theories When You Have “Con’s Piracy Facts”?, Interview with Journalist and Author Mark Crispin Miller (56:35, mp3) Wiki Politiki, 12 May 2020
“Censorship – it’s not the vicious lies they fear, it’s those vicious truths.” —Swami Beyondananda
There is a telling quote I ran across, purportedly by Ronald Reagan’s CIA director William Casey: “We will know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”
So if you’re confused about what is true in the age of COVID-19 ... relax. It’s part of the plan. At a time when we have a pathologically blatant liar in the White House, a corporate media that cannot be trusted, and Google, You Tube, Facebook, and Twitter de-platforming dissenting opinions at the behest of the powers that be in power, who or what are we to believe? How do we practice discernment?
Our guest this week, Mark Crispin Miller, is a voice in the bewilderness, whose views bridge and transcend the established left and right narratives, as he takes on issues such as fixed elections, the controversy over vaccines, and media censorship.
Mark Crispin Miller earned his bachelor’s degree from Northwestern University in 1971, and his doctorate in English from Johns Hopkins University in 1977. He is currently a Professor of Media, Culture and Communication at New York University. He is the author of several books, including, The Bush Dyslexicon: Observations on a National Disorder, Cruel and Unusual: Bush/Cheney’s New World Order and Fooled Again: The Real Case for Electoral Reform (2007).
Miller is the editor of Forbidden Bookshelf, an e-book series that revives important works now out of print, most of which were variously killed at birth. He also wrote the introduction to the 2004 edition of Edward Bernays’ book Propaganda. He is also editor of News From the Underground.
If you’re feeling confused, betrayed, disheartened by the Orwellian nature of our official government / corporate / media narratives and are not content to leave Orwell enough alone, please join us for this heartening and enlivening conversation. Remember what the Swami says: “The truth shall upset you free.”
To get a truly meta-perspective on fake news and real lies, tune in to this show.
Nobel prize-winning scientist: the Covid-19 epidemic was never exponential, (34:33, mp3) UnHerd, 2 May 2020
As he is careful to point out, Professor Michael Levitt is not an epidemiologist. He’s Professor of Structural Biology at the Stanford School of Medicine, and winner of the 2013 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for “the development of multiscale models for complex chemical systems.”
With a purely statistical perspective, he has been playing close attention to the Covid-19 pandemic since January, when most of us were not even aware of it. He first spoke out in early February, when through analysing the numbers of cases and deaths in Hubei province he predicted with remarkable accuracy that the epidemic in that province would top out at around 3,250 deaths.
In this interview with Freddie Sayers, Executive Editor of UnHerd, Professor Levitt explains why he thinks indiscriminate lockdown measures as “a huge mistake,” and advocates a “smart lockdown” policy, focused on more effective measures, focused on protecting elderly people.
Why lockdowns are the wrong policy - Swedish expert Prof. Johan Giesecke, (34:53, mp3) UnHerd, 17 Apr 2020
Professor Johan Giesecke, one of the world’s most senior epidemiologists, advisor to the Swedish Government (he hired Anders Tegnell who is currently directing Swedish strategy), the first Chief Scientist of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, and an advisor to the director general of the WHO, lays out with typically Swedish bluntness why he thinks:

   Films / Videos    
Letter from the madhouse

The media campaign of 11 September 2001 proved to leaders that it is possible with modern technology to bamboozle millions of people without firing a single shot. Goebbels was unable to achieve this feat. The campaign has left millions still believing until today that 9/11 was the work of Islamic fanatics. One would never have dreamt that in the internet era, the majority of university graduates will fall prey to such an absurd fairy tale.

This successful experiment in mass manipulation is now being repeated with even more spectacular results. Whereas in 2001 the effects of the media campaign were limited to filling the minds of millions with images of Osama bin Laden and scaring them against fake terrorists, the current campaign goes further. It proves the ability of leaders to manipulate not only the beliefs but also the material behavior of the masses by telling them what to do. Entire peoples obey like small children the orders of professional liars who are not even their parents. China and Israel with their all-out mass surveillance systems, recording every action of every citizen, constitute the wet dream of Western leaders. They go to China and Israel and admire how orderly and obedient the masses are disciplined. Corona has given them the right tool to direct people, no matter how absurd the order. It will probably still take another mass propaganda campaign to ensure that Western peoples will stand in queue and beg to be led by Big Brother. Dissidents will be sent to « education camps », the Chinese method.

I have never before lived in a madhouse. It’s a new experience, rather unpleasant, I must say. But we three family members survive the birthpangs of the new age of state terrrorism thanks to music, the garden and our love of free thought.

Elias Davidsson, 25 April 2020
   CRITICAL ANALYSIS    
A growing chorus—of ordinary citizens and world-renowned medical and scientific experts—is raising questions about matters ranging from the coronavirus’s origins to the rationale for continued lockdowns.
8 MORE Experts Questioning the Coronavirus Panic,” Off Guardian, 17 Apr 2020
10 MORE Experts Criticising the Coronavirus Panic,” Off Guardian, 28 Mar 2020
12 Experts Questioning the Coronavirus Panic,” Off Guardian, 24 Mar 2020
On the Possible Origins of Coronavirus, Part 1,” Toby Rogers, Ph.D. & Team, Children’s Health Defense, 7 May 2020

A Timeline—Pandemic and Erosion of Freedoms Have Been Decades in the Making,” Children’s Health Defense Team, 21 May 2020
Mark Crispin Miller: News From Underground
http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground
Will this crisis usher in FEDERAL mandatory mass vaccinations?
It will if we allow it.

   Resistance ≠ Futile    
Study claiming that asymptomatic people can transmit the new coronavirus was “flawed” (to put it mildly)—from an article that came out on FEBRUARY 3rd!
newsfromunderground, 3 May 2020: Here we all are under house arrest, with healthy people quarantined, and, when they creep out into the desolated world, ordered to wear masks and stay six feet apart—all because of a botched “study” that was expertly refuted three months ago.
This is beyond outrageous. How many people have now died, or will die in this new Great Depression, because of that junk science?
And—even more important—what will it now take to make this known? Since Il Fauci surely won’t retract retract his ringing affirmation of that work (“This study lays the question [of asymptomatic transmission] to rest”) “our free press” won’t report it, nor are the proprietors of “social media” likely to enable, or allow, its circulation.
So it is up to us, we angry few, to spread the word. Please send this email far and wide.
MCM
Germans repatriated from Wuhan, China, arrive at an army barracks on 1 February to be examined for signs of infection with the new coronavirus. FRANK RUMPENHORST/PICTURE-ALLIANCE/DPA/AP IMAGES
Study claiming new coronavirus can be transmitted by people without symptoms was flawed
By Kai Kupferschmidt Feb. 3, 2020 , 5:30 PM

A paper published on 30 January in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) about the first four people in Germany infected with a novel coronavirus made many headlines because it seemed to confirm what public health experts feared: that someone who has no symptoms from infection with the virus, named 2019-nCoV, can still transmit it to others. That might make controlling the virus much harder.

Chinese researchers had previously suggested asymptomatic people might transmit the virus but had not presented clear-cut evidence. “There’s no doubt after reading [the NEJM] paper that asymptomatic transmission is occurring,” Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told journalists. “This study lays the question to rest.”

But now, it turns out that information was wrong. The Robert Koch Institute (RKI), the German government’s public health agency, has written a letter to NEJM to set the record straight, even though it was not involved in the paper.

Read the rest.


Keith Rushworth: Epidemiology Explained
Why the Science behind Lockdown is Wrong
Off Guardian
14 Apr: 50 Headlines: Welcome to the “new normal” 25 Apr: 50 Headlines Darker: More of the “New Normal”
COVID-19 Civic Freedom Tracker
Keep Civic Space Healthy
International Center for Not-For-Profit Law (ICNL)
This tracker monitors government responses to the pandemic that affect civic freedoms and human rights, focusing on emergency laws.

“Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed; everything else is public relations.”
—George Orwell
Uwe Alschner: Kategorie: SARS-Corona 2
Vitalstoff.Blog, Das Blog über Prävention und Mikronährstoffe

   Evolving Situation    
The art of the smear: How Buzzfeed and other propaganda mills “debunk” those questioning the Official Narrative of COVID-19
As “our free press” ramps up its loyal service as Big Pharma’s Ministry of Truth, it’s doing an ever cruder version of the Propaganda Two-Step, which you perform by pumping out Big Lies non-stop, while also blacking out and/or defaming anyone who dares to contradict or question them.
We have an excellent example of the latter tactic in this wad of excrement from Buzzfeed, hurled at six “spin doctors” (i.e., dissident physicians), two “5G conspiracy theorists,” and two of “the misquoted” (two doctors whom Buzzfeed’s minions couldn’t find a way to tar outright).
What makes it such a good example is the blatancy of its key features. Note, first, that it does not even address, much less refute, any of the information offered, and/or arguments presented, by the heretics. Instead of actually rebutting what they’ve said or written, this hit-piece (along with countless others) smears the heretics themselves, with mere insulting epithets and vicious mockery.
Such propaganda must rely primarily on slander and derision, because what those dissidents have said, about COVID-19 and/or 5G, is either true or highly plausible—which means that the Official Narratives in question are untenable. This is why such hit-pieces are so nakedly authoritarian, “debunking” its targets just by telling us “what the authorities have said.”
Thus this piece baldly tells its readers what to think (or, rather, what to feel, since there’s no thought involved), and how to serve as individual vectors of the propaganda; and so it isn’t just a catalogue of smears, concocted to discourage anyone from looking into what those targeted have had to say. It also functions as a sort of script, providing Buzzfeed’s followers with ammo to be used on “social media,” and/or in fights with any infidels among their friends or family.
Although the number, unanimity and virulence of such attacks is something new (and grounds for seeing it as a sign of desperation), the basic strategy is over half-a-century old, as it was the CIA that first weaponized the epithet “conspiracy theorist” back in 1967, in its memo #1035-960, sent out to CIA station chiefs worldwide to enlist their help in smearing critics of the Warren Report, not just by calling them “conspiracy theorists,” but also by deploying one or more of several (what we would call) talking points against them.
What we’re seeing today is a streamlining of that process. Whereas, back then, the CIA encouraged its media assets to defame those questioning the Official Narrative (of JFK’s assassination), so that readers would then doubt the honesty or sanity of those dissenters. Today, the culture having largely moved online, the propaganda aims directly at its audience, inviting them to spread its toxin all throughout the tissues of the nation, by parroting the memes of the Official Narrative (of COVID-19, 5G, vaccination and whatever else the powers behind the propaganda want the rest of us swallow).
Here, for your convenience and enlightenment, is a list of dissidents re: COVID-19, its origins, and/or the policies and practices now being used to “cure” it. This is just a start on such a list of medical professionals. Nor do I necessarily agree with everything those listed here have either said or written—but they have every right to speak their piece, and those of us who care to know what’s really going should give them a fair hearing, and think about it for ourselves.
John Ioannidis
Knut Wittkowski
David L. Katz
Rashid Bhuttar
Dan Erickson
Artin Massihi
Dolores Cahill
Sunetra Gupta
Didier Raoult
Luc Montagnier
Meryl Nass
Cameron Kyle-Sidell
Wolfgang Wodarg
Judy Mikovits
Andrew Kaufman
Andrea Crisanti
Russell Blaylock
Rashid A Buttar
Sherri Tenpenny
Gary Nepute
Gary Null
Richard Gale
Joseph Mercola
Johan Giesecke
Anders Tegnell
David Starkey

These Are The Fake Experts Pushing Pseudoscience And Conspiracy Theories About The Coronavirus Pandemic
A guide to the spin doctors and conspiracy theorists clogging up your social media feed.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/janelytvynenko/coronavirus-spin-doctors

I titled the talk tonight, Are You Scared Yet? I did that, despite the fact that Jane Hunter has said, in one interview at least, that my lectures are like drugs in the sixties in that they paralyze people with fear and make them inactive. That’s not anything I’ve ever heard from an audience but it’s what she said about me. I think, in fact, my message, when read properly is more that people should calm down and try to distinguish what they’re being asked, or told, to be afraid of and what they ought to be afraid in reality which is generally hidden from them and the extent to which they ought to be afraid or ought to act instead.

I also knew a guy years ago when I worked in the anti-psychiatry movement, John Parkin, who said that he wanted to start a national campaign to abolish paranoia by elevating it to realistic fear. There isn’t a term in the English language that’s the opposite of paranoia, unless it’s just complacency. But there isn’t healthy or realistic fear that maybe somebody is doing something to you. William S. Burroughs said, that paranoia is having all the facts. So I try to get as many as I can, ’cause I’m trying to get there.

But my purpose, of course, isn’t to make other people paranoid. My purpose is to hopefully enlighten people about what’s happening around them and what they ought to be putting their focus on. Charlie Manson said, paranoia is heightened awareness. Michael McClure said that even paranoids have enemies. I know I have some. But I don’t spend my life looking over my shoulder, I try to look in front of me and see what’s coming.

John Judge, “Are You Scared Yet? The War Without an Enemy
Terrorism and the Strategy of Tension
,”

Santa Monica, California, 1996
   VACCINE EFFECTS    
a Primer: The Irrefutable Argument Against Vaccine Safety with Author Del Bigtree, (1:35:45, mp3) Feb 2018; covers the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act which fully indemnified pharmaceutical companies from all liability when their vaccine products killed or injured the recipient.
Excerpts from the talk:
[00:05]
Last time I was here I had just made the film Vaxxed, it was out, we were talking about the fraud at the CDC. For those of you that have not seen Vaxxed, very simply I was a producer on the daytime talk show The Doctors where I worked for six years. I won an Emmy Awards celebrating the best that medicine has to offer, the best doctors, best scientists, cutting-edge technologies. I am a fan of doctors. I’m a fan of science and I want to state that right up front. I ran into the story of Dr. William Thompson, the CDC whistleblower, who came forward in 2015 and said they’d committed scientific fraud on the MMR autism study; that they saw a connection between the MMR vaccine and autism then they hid it from the public. That’s essentially what the film is about.
[02:36]
What you’re about to see today is a presentation that we gave at the National Institute of Health. Many of you may have remembered Donald Trump made a statement that he was going to put Robert Kennedy, Jr. as the head of a Vaccine Safety Commission. That didn’t necessarily transpire the way that we had thought. But this meeting was set up by Donald Trump and we got to present before Francis Collins, the head of the National Institute of Health, Tony Fauci, head of our Infectious Disease Division of CDC, FDA, HHS, all of the heads of our Health Departments were sitting across the table. This is what we presented to them. So I want you to think about that. I’m not just telling you. We said this right to their faces and I’ll give you a sense of what their response was. I’m not trying to mix something up. We’ve presented our issues with this Vaccine Program and the answers are really deplorable.
[53:44]
This is [Dr.] Bernadine Healy. She was the head of the National Institute of Health. They did the most amount of funding from our government for health. The National Institute of Health is our top brain trust of science and medicine and she was the head of it and this is what she had to say:
This is the time when we do have the opportunity to understand whether or not there are susceptible children—perhaps genetically, perhaps they have a metabolic issue, mitochondrial disorder, immunological issue—that makes them more susceptible to vaccines plural or to one particular vaccine or to a component of vaccine like mercury....
The fact that there is concern that you don’t want to know that susceptible group is a real disappointment to me. If you know that susceptible group you can save those children. The reason why they didn’t want to look for those susceptibility groups was because they’re afraid that if they found them, however big or small they were, that that would scare the public away.
It sounds like you don’t think the hypothesis of a link between vaccines and autism is completely irrational.
So when I first heard about it I thought, That doesn’t make sense to me. The more you delve into it, if you look at the basic science, if you look at the research that’s been done on animals, if you also look at some of these individual cases and if you look at the evidence that there is no link what I come away with is the question has not been answered.
Did you ever hear that? Head of the National Institute of Health: &ldquoquestion has not been answered.” You’ve buried this and autism is skyrocketing, autoimmune disease is skyrocketing, our children are so sick and yet we’re worried about measles.
[1:00:49]
What intelligent society doesn’t reflect on Hitler and Nazi Germany? What have we heard? If you forget your past you’re doomed to repeat it At what point do we wake up and say this is scary times folks? Why is all this important? Because look, at the same time the vaccines are increasing, which is the red dots—and then the autoimmune disease is going up right alongside of it.
CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink, this is what we asked them to do. We said, You have a data link that has 10 million individuals in it. It’s kept up to date every year. The entire life health outcomes and reports from these people is in there. We simply want you to run the unvaccinated children against the fully vaccinated children in a comparative study. Run the health outcomes. What are the rates of cancer, autoimmune, disease, multiple sclerosis, on and on and on? What they said: We can’t figure out how to do that study. That’s what they said. Tony Fauci and Francis Collins looked us in the eyes and said, the brain trust of world health cannot figure out how to compare unvaccinated kids to vaccinated kids. There you go. It’s unethical to do a pre-licensing study and we are incapable of figuring out how to do a post-licensing study. That’s where we’re at.

2016 Documentary: Vaxxed - From Cover-Up To Catastrophe (1:31:00)

The Highwire with Del Bigtree

Vaccination Rates Drop to Alarmingly Low Levels During Lockdowns,” Jordan Davidson, EcoWatch, 20 May 2020

Bill Gates and Intellectual Ventures Funds Microchip Implant Vaccine Technology,” Celeste McGovern, GreenMedInfo.com, 14 Apr 2020

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Vaxxter:
Coronavirus Pt 1: How Soon We Forget – Same Playbook, Different Virus, 24 Mar 2020
Coronavirus Pt 2: ‘Never Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste’, Replay, 30 Mar 2020
I view most current events through the lens of history. As I wrote in Part 1 of this series, we’re seeing a repeat of what happened after 911. Only a few weeks after the towers came down in NYC, the draconian Patriot Act was passed into law on October 26, 2001.
Now, within a few weeks of the outbreak of a coronavirus, a virus we don’t know much about or how long it will cause serious illness, the world has implemented draconian, stay-home “social distancing” rules.
Even this phrase has psychological implications. They didn’t call it “physical distancing” but “social distancing,” a way to separate us at a time we should all be coming together.
How serious is the risk from this pathogen? On the one hand, we hear that 80% of patients experience a mild form of the illness, which can include a fever and pneumonia, and many of these cases require little to no medical intervention.
On the other, we hear that 200,000 to 2 million may die in the US alone. Which is it? Are we really so afraid of this pathogen that we’ve shut down the world? Are we so afraid of contracting this infection that we’re anticipating—even looking forward to—the development of a vaccine that will be deemed a covered countermeasure and have no liability, even if it injures or kills many and protects no one?
Look at this chart closely (click to enlarge). This graphic, from 2016, distributes the number of deaths by health risk factors throughout the entire world. It shows what people die from WITHOUT an infection by a rogue virus.

Russian book covering many studies about how dangerous and unsafe vaccines are.
To vaccinate or not to vaccinate? or Well, think about it, an injection! Vaccination Myths, Amantonio, Publishing House AST, 2020

Swine-flu vaccine side-effects so bad ‘that children were like schizophrenics’,” Ralph Riegel, Independent.ie, 3 Sep 2018

The Only Vaccine Guide a New Parent Will Ever Need,” J.B. Handley, Circle of Docs, 2016

Vaccine Peer Review, The History Of The Global Vaccination Program In 1000 Peer Reviewed Reports And Studies, 1915-2015,” A Jeff Prager Publication, 2016

The truth behind the vaccine cover-up, ” Russell L. Blaylock MD, Medical Veritas, 5 (2008) 1714-1726

We were talking—about the space
between us all
And the people—who hide themselves
behind a wall of illusion
Never glimpse the truth—then it’s far
too late when they pass away.
We were talking—about the love we all
could share—when we find it
To try our best to hold it there—with
our love
With our love—we could save the world
—if they only knew.
Try to realise it’s all within yourself
no-one else can make you change
And to see you’re really only very small,
and life flows on within you and without
you.
We were talking—about the love that’s
gone so cold and the people,
Who gain the world and lose their soul—
they don’t know—they can’t see—are
you one of them?
When you’ve seen beyond yourself—
then you may find, peace of mind is
waiting there—
And the time will come when you see
we’re all one, and life flows on within
you and without you.
George Harrison
                                                                           
back to rat haus | Index | Search | tree