A striking feature of our culture includes the specific set of illusions presented by commercial print and broadcast media which promote a representation of reality through omission, distortion, lack of contextual analysis, and disinforming opinion stated as obvious, incontestable fact. It is always our choice what lens we adopt to view the world and our place in it.
Lockdown only pushes the severe cases
into the future – it will not prevent them
“‘People in power lie’, my father once told me.... [T]he more enduring tragedy, arguably, is that we cannot trust our news media to tell us the truth about vital health issues when advertising dollars are at stake. You scratch your head and wonder how all those Trump supporters don’t share your indignation at President Trump’s mendacity. One answer is that they are disheartened by once-trusted media outlets who have also set the precedent of routinely lying and violating the public trust, wounding in the process our democracy, public faith in critical institutions, and the health of our children.”—Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., “Flu Misinformation and Coronavirus Fears: My Letter to Dr. Sanjay Gupta,” Children’s Health Defense, 16 Apr 2020“That [Feb 2020] letter [to the Lancet] was ostensibly to show solidarity with the workers in Wuhan, but it also had a phrase denouncing the conspiracy theories as to the non-natural origin of the pandemic. And again, it was an attempt to shut down debate. To me, that’s totally antithetical to the scientific process. The scientific process should welcome scrutiny and debate on serious questions like this, and then you have a hypothesis, and you break the hypothesis, and you produce evidence and reasonable argument. They attempted to short-circuit all of that by saying, ‘This is conspiracy stuff’.”
12 Dec 2018: Bill Gates heads to a workshop on global health at the NIH with (left) National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci and NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins (right).
“Grow some balls”: A open letter to our kept intelligentsia
The situation is dire. I have lived though the ending of the Soviet Union, and I am telling you, what we are dealing with right now is worse, much worse—and no, it is not because of Donald Trump or the virus. The issue is much deeper. We have gotten too complacent, too zealous, too anxiously dependent on being in sync with our echo chamber—the latter being shamelessly manipulated by moneyed interests. What happened to free-form thinking beyond a google search or a conformist New York Times editorial? It is so hard for an educated American to accept the fact that our entire establishment—the left, the right, and the seemingly radical—is corrupt, egotistical, and unreliable, and that we have somehow turned into a dark cartoon about unsatisfied, underloved, gullible children? Our imaginary ideal of Law and Order has been long sold to the rats. We are in a free fall of all-encompassing corruption that has permeated all areas of social function, including politics, media, and even science. We are a complacent empire in deep trouble, and our fear of genuine, unbranded dissent makes us complicit. If we continue pretending that the voice of the establishment is the voice of reason, we will go down in history as sorry clowns—just like the pompous Soviet functionaries did. As it stands now, our state-aligned media has outperformed Pravda at absurdity and lack of coherence (outrageously so when it comes to the pandemic), our corporations are colluding with the state at a warp speed to suck the life out of us in the most profitable way, and the abuse of language has gotten unbearable. As a human being who is thirsty for truth, I can no longer tolerate it. It is as if we fell asleep and woke up inside a slogan generating vortex that consumes our souls and spits out syntactically perfect but otherwise meaningless sentences constructed from words like “progress,” “pandemic,” “public safety,” “social distancing,” “stay home,” and “privilege.”... Betrayal by the establishment is something I have been thinking about for years, as a result of having lived in the post-soviet space and observing the sadness of the perceived irrelevance that the generation of my grandparents experienced when the Soviet Union fell. They lived their lives bravely, they suffered a lot, they defeated Hitler—and then suddenly, in their old age, they became ideologically irrelevant and helpless in the face of medical cruelty and indifference of the machine. Is history repeating itself?
Presentation in Madrid, 25 July 2020
“Doctors for Truth”. Rebellion after six and a half months of murder and suicide. Coronavirus: Death, Ruin, Coups and Responsibilities VII
Joaquín Murrieta, El Correo de España, 1 Aug 2020
Washington, D.C., 27 June 2020
Dr. Stella Immanuel, primary care physician, Houston, TX excerpt:
Speaking The Truth About HCQ and COVID (5:33)
ACU-Conference 2, 31 Jul 2020
(Deutsch, Englisch, Spanisch, Ungarisch Portugiesisch)
We have this international perspective and we have a great chance with this Second International Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee. Please stay tuned. All my colleagues will have a lot of statements. With more time we will translate this on our website, https://acu2020.org. We translated it so far in eight languages and we invite you all to come together to support this movement for health for freedom and for justice. Because we see that we have no killer virus all over the world and it’s a good message. But on the other side we see it looks like there are highly criminal people who do this and they do this with no evidence. In this book our colleague, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi from Germany, with his colleague, Dr. Karina Reiss, they published all the facts, all the scientific and medical facts, in this book. It’s called Corona Fehlalarm?. [Corona False Alarm? (Eng review)] It will be published in english soon and hopefully in other languages because we together we stand here, we sit here, and we are with you. We raise the red flag to the criminals and we will investigate this. So please stay tuned and support us. Thank you very much.
ACU-Conference 1, 2 Jul 2020
Translations presented in 10 languages
English translation excerpt:
Welcome to the ACU, the Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee. If Parliament does not do it, we, the citizens, are called upon to do it ourselves.
As the Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, we will investigate why these restrictive measures were imposed upon us in our country as part of CoVid-19, why people are suffering now and whether there is proportionality of the measures to this disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We have serious doubts that these measures are proportionate. This needs to be examined, and since the parliaments—neither the opposition parties nor the ruling parties—have not convened a committee and it is not even planned, it is high time that we took this into our own hands. We will invite and hear experts here in the Corona speaker group. These are experts from all areas of life: medicine, social affairs, law, economics and many more.
Well-known experts have already agreed to be part of it. In addition to the speaker group, my colleague Prof. HADITSCH and my colleague Dr. SCHIFFMANN, I would also like to introduce myself. My name is Heiko SCHÖNING, I’m an ordinary doctor from Hamburg. My personal motivation is that I am a father, like many others in this country who have children. And we see that our children are suffering now, not just because the playgrounds have been closed, but because they are separated. And it’s worse for the adults.
We ask ourselves: Why are people no longer allowed to visit their parents in retirement homes? Is there such a great risk of infection? Do we really have a killer virus here? Do we have rabies or do we have the plague? We have serious doubts that this is the case! We do not have the plague! What really helps us in this context is decency and honesty, as the famous Nobel Prize winner Albert CAMUS already expressed in his wonderful book "The Plague". We want to make sure that the ACU, the Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, is based on honesty and transparency.
This is why experts—such as Prof. BHAKDI from medicine, Prof. OTTE from business, or legal expert Prof. JUNGBLUT, and many, many others who have already agreed—will get together in this committee. And of course, we also invite all experts from the government, the public institutes, the Robert Koch Institute, and certainly international experts as well. We will guarantee transparency. All expert statements will be broadcast live, without editing, you can watch it all on the Internet. We are going to set up a website, and of course we will need more resources for that. Therefore, please support this citizens’ request, this ACU citizens’ initiative.
What will be the ideal outcome? We will see that we do not have to be more afraid than the last few years with normal flu waves, because this is exactly how this one seems to be. Then why were these drastic measures taken? ...
Renowned French Scientist: Coronavirus ‘Danger is No Longer Present Yet We Continue to Spread an Irrational Fear’
Jean-François Toussaint, Professor of Physiology,
University of Paris, 10 Aug 2020
On August 10, Jean-François Toussaint, Professor of Physiology at the University of Paris was the guest on the popular French program “Les Grandes Gueules” on RMC. Toussaint previously served as President of the Estates General of Prevention and member of the High Council for Public Health.
Asked about the current health crisis resulting from contamination by the Chinese virus at the start of the school year, Professor Toussaint explained that the protective measures are divorced from any scientific rationale. On French national television he warned, that as the crisis continues, the response becomes “increasingly less and less scientific and increasingly irrational”.
Professor Toussaint believes that young people are the scapegoats in this pandemic. “In phases of major tension, the way we are going to operate irrationally is to designate the goat. Who is the goat now? Youth.”
As reported by Epoch Times, the professor denounces the wearing of corona masks and the government’s push to blame children for a potential “second wave”:
“it’s just social mimicry, that’s just that, we have absolutely no demonstration of any scientific interest and currently we say: it is the youth who make themselves” responsible “for the second wave ”. But no, that’s a ‘collective suicide’ generated by the Scientific Council, to collapse an economy whose young people will pay the most important price in the years to come.”
And from this recording: “The decisions that have been taken, these side effects this second half of the time that we will have, if we manage to blow the whistle at the end of the first half, so if the second half comes, it will be essentially social, economic and health-related, because today’s economy is tomorrow’s prevention and tomorrow’s health.
“We have just shown that more than sixty thousand children in the world have already died from the effects of general confinement. From blind confinement, that has not allowed them to have the necessary nutrition, to have the food intake that allows them to survive.
“In all the countries that have blindly confined people, it is clear that in all of these countries there is no relationship between the intensity of the confinement and the motivation behind it.”
LOCKDOWN LUNACY - the thinking person’s guide
to an imaginary war
J.B. Handley, j.b. handley blog, 30 May 2020
For anyone willing to look, there are so many facts that tell the true story, and it goes something like this:
Knowing what we know today about COVID-19’s Infection Fatality Rate, asymmetric impact by age and medical condition, non-transmissibility by asymptomatic people and in outdoor settings, near-zero fatality rate for children, and the basic understanding of viruses through Farr’s law, locking down society was a bone-headed policy decision so devastating to society that historians may judge it as the all-time worst decision ever made. Worse, as these clear facts have become available, many policy-makers haven’t shifted their positions, despite the fact that every hour under any stage of lockdown has a domino-effect of devastation to society. Meanwhile, the media—with a few notable exceptions—is oddly silent on all the good news. Luckily, an unexpected group of heroes across the political landscape—many of them doctors and scientists—have emerged to tell the truth, despite facing extreme criticism and censorship from an angry mob desperate to continue fighting an imaginary war.My goal is to engage in known facts. You, the reader, can decide if all of these facts, when you put them together, equate to the story above.
LOCKDOWN LUNACY 2.0: Second Wave? Not even close.
J.B. Handley, j.b. handley blog, 29 Jun 2020
Why did politicians ever lockdown society in the first place? Can we all agree that the stated purpose was to “flatten the curve” so our hospital system could handle the inevitable COVID-19 patients who needed care? At that point, at least, back in early March, people were behaving rationally. They accepted that you can’t eradicate a virus, so let’s postpone things enough to handle it. The fact is, we have done that, and so much more. The headlines are filled with dire warnings of a “second wave” and trigger-happy Governors are rolling back regulations to try to stem the tide of new cases. But, is any of it actually true and should we all be worried? No, it’s not a second wave. The COVID-19 virus is on its final legs, and while I have filled this post with graphs to prove everything I just said, this is really the only graph you need to see, it’s the CDC’s data, over time, of deaths from COVID-19 here in the U.S., and the trend line is unmistakable:
LOCKDOWN LUNACY 3.0: It’s over
J.B. Handley, j.b. handley blog, 27 Jul 2020
If you’re hoping the COVID-19 pandemic will go on forever, this post may disappoint you. And, I get it. We have gone frothing-at-the-mouth nuts over a slightly above-normal virulence virus, with a unique and obvious age-distribution pattern that should have made containment easy and panic completely unnecessary. And, if you’re living in the United States, like I am, you probably think my declaration that this pandemic is “over” to be somewhere between wishful thinking and incredibly premature, and I hear you, too, although forgive me if I’m not sure you’re the one thinking clearly, given some of the things I’ve recently read. I promise to support my assertion with data, and the wisdom of people far more expert than me who are having a harder time being heard in the present climate of...bats#@t crazy.
Have we lost our collective minds? Yes.
You may not be one of them. In fact, I’m guessing the people who actually take the time to read my blog posts are the few remaining who haven’t been subsumed by the panic, but can we agree that most have? Jeffrey A. Tucker of the American Institute for Economic Research put it best in his excellent essay on July 10 titled, When will the Madness End?:
“I’m a practicing psychiatrist who specializes in anxiety disorders, paranoid delusions, and irrational fear. I’ve been treating this in individuals as a specialist. It’s hard enough to contain these problems in normal times. What’s happening now is a spread of this serious medical condition to the whole population. It can happen with anything but here we see a primal fear of disease turning into mass panic. It seems almost deliberate. It is tragic. Once this starts, it could take years to repair the psychological damage.”
I’m 50 years old, and I’ve noticed that younger people seem particularly scared of COVID-19, they are the ones I typically see biking and hiking with masks on...
Daniel Horowitz wrote a great article about this survey titled, New study: Millennials think their risk from COVID-19 is exponentially more than the true threat. He writes:
Perhaps the most destructive element of lockdown is the panic and fear that such severe measures help confirm, in this case, wrongly so, in the minds of the young and impressionable. As the paper concludes, “Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted.” In other words, we need to flatten the fear.I thought that survey was bad enough, but a different survey by Kekst CNC asking different questions revealed a simply astonishing figure: Americans over-estimated the TOTAL number of compatriots who have died from COVID-19 by 200-fold! When asked the question (in mid-July), “How many people in your country have died from the Coronavirus?”, Americans responded “9%,” which would be roughly 30,000,000 people, versus the actual number of 151,000. No wonder people are panicked (and wildly, wildly misinformed.)
It’s all part of this effort to drive biosecurity into the leading factor in all foreign and domestic policy and that biosecurity excuse gives them a chance to impose conditions on human beings that no government, no tyranny, not the worst tyranny in history—not Mao Tse Tung, not Pol Pot, not Joseph Stalin, not Adolf Hitler—did not have the power that these people now have to tell you, to tell everybody in our country: You have to stay in your house, You have to wear a mask, You can’t go to the beach, You can’t hike in the woods, You can’t get close to your girlfriend, You can’t hold somebody’s hand, You can’t send your children to school. We’re gonna treat little kids like they’re a biohazard and we’re going to teach them that their fellow students are biohazards.
We have a government telling us to do all these things and I don’t object to the government telling me to do it if they tell me what the rationale is. But they’ve lied to us from day one about this virus. First of all of the estimates of how many people it’s going to kill. They said 2 million in this country. We now know those were completely fraudulent, never peer reviewed estimates that were created by Bill Gates and his lackey Neil Ferguson, a guy who is this biostatistician who is notorious, in every pandemic from hoof and mouth disease to covid, of exaggerating, of just lying [See: The Ferguson Effect, 9 Apr 2020 and The expert behind the Covid-19 shutdown was wrong on CJD and foot-and-mouth, and is probably wrong again now. But he’s not alone, 1 Apr 2020]
So they told us that and that prompted the lockdown. Then all of the testing kits, the way that they’re reporting the disease, the way that they’re testing for it where at CDC, we now know, it was never distinguished between the antibody tests and the test that test whether you have an active virus. We have no idea when they say All these people in Texas, All these people in Florida are all infected and Holy cow it’s galloping across the country. But we don’t know whether those are old antibodies maybe from a cold, common cold that they got 10 years ago. And nobody’s reporting what the deaths are and that is really the only relevant metric.
Now I look at CNN every day, I’m just sick to my stomach because they won’t tell me where are we on the death curve? It’s the only curve that counts. And they’re telling us all of the—they’re deliberately trying to frighten us all the time rather than trying to have what we need to have. Now they’re gaming all of these numbers and you have to be stupid to not see that they’re doing that or completely naïve.
I’m ready to do whatever I need to do for my country, my community, to protect people. But I do not want to be ordered to do things that don’t make any sense to me, that are not the product of policies that come from open debate, civil debate and respectful debate that is based on empirical scientific facts. I do not want to be motivated by fear. I will not let somebody scare me into doing something and I think most people, most Americans, I think feel that way. They don’t want to be frightened. Well anyway, a lot of us do. We don’t—it’s not that we don’t want to do things that are going to help our community and other people. We just see that this whole thing is being gamed and that the public health officials have been lying for years.
I remember, I was reading recently Polly, about John Anthony Morris. John Anthony Morris [1919-2014] was one of the greatest bacteriologists in history. He worked for 32 years. He was the chief bacteriologist at NIH and he was the guy who was in charge in the early 70s in developing a flu vaccine. He helped develop the flu vaccine and he said, you know what? We actually are testing this vaccine and One, it’s coated with extraneous bacteria. Number two, it doesn’t prevent the flu. Number three it’s causing really bad neurological outcomes in people and it’s fraudulent. When I said he developed it, the companies developed the flu vaccine but then they had to go through NIH’s process and he was the guy who was in charge of monitoring those protocols and the testing compliance with those protocols.
He told his bosses at NIH that this is a fraudulent vaccine. It doesn’t work. It kills people. It causes brain damage. And it may actually cause people to get the flu or make it more likely that they get the flu, do something to their immune system where they’re more likely to get the flu.
He was told to shut up and his bosses went to Congress—there was a swine flu epidemic in 1976, and at Fort Dix one soldier died—and they said this is the beginning of a swine flu pandemic. It never materialized. And they said this is the beginning and it’s going to kill more people than the Spanish Flu, 50 million people. 140 million people today could die from this disease. They went to President Gerald Ford. They got 135 million dollars, which was a huge amount of money back then, to create 140 million flu shots to give to 140 million Americans. And they ended up giving it to 40 million.
They fired John Anthony Morris. He would not keep his mouth shut. They locked his lab. They stole all of his notebooks and they fired him for returning library books late. That was the excuse that they needed to drum up because this guy was such a good employee that he’d never done anything else wrong in 32 years. He ultimately sued them. He was completely exonerated by the court and he was restored. But what he said is, in 1987 he gave an interview to the New York Times, he said in the 11 years since this happened they’ve been selling this flu vaccine to the American public and they’ve done nothing to improve it and it’s fraudulent.
Episode 12: A Conversation with Dr. Judy Mikovits and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Pt 3 of 3) (1:12:57, mp3) Translation - German transcript in 4 parts: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4auto-generated transcript with timestamps
Perspectives on the Pandemic interviewed Dr. Judy Mikovits on April 16th, 2020, and again on May 15th. In her second interview, she was joined by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. We have divided the two conversations into three parts, the first two focusing on Dr. Mikovits, and the third on Mr. Kennedy. This is part three.
Think about that: Congress did it for a product that they said, We need it because you can’t make it safely. And so, and now, they had no incentive to make it safe, because the lawsuits are all disappeared. Because you can’t sue them: you can’t sue them for medical malpractice, there are no depositions, there’s no discovery, there’s no mass or class action suits, or, document discovery—nothing. They have zero incentive to make them safe. And not only that, because the vaccine industry was exempt from vaccine testing, they’re saving a huge amount of money—hundreds of millions of dollars—because they don’t have to safety test them. The other big cost, after safety testing and licensing, for bringing a drug to market is the subsequent cost of lawsuits. Now they didn’t have that cost. Not only that, but they don’t have any marketing or advertising costs, because the product is mandated to 74 million people and they’re very high-margin products. So, the Gardasil vaccine, they get $420 for the vaccine course. They’re making—if you can get a vaccine on CDC schedule, it’s worth an average of about a billion dollars a year in profit to your company. So, there was a gold rush....... And then, what happened was, you suddenly had all these vaccines that hit the schedule, beginning in 1989. And 1989 is the beginning of what we call The Vaccine Generation. It is the sickest generation in history, not from infectious disease, but from chronic disease. Chronic disease level in this country in 1940 was 6%. In 1986, when we had 11 vaccines on the schedule, it was 12.8%. If you were born prior to 1989, your chance of having a chronic disease is 12.8%. If you are born after 1989, your chance of having a chronic disease is 54% to 60%. And what are those chronic diseases? There are three main categories.
The vaccine industry when I was a kid was making about 200 million dollars a year. Today it’s making 60 billion. They make 60 billion from the mandated vaccines. But they’re making 500 billion a year treating injuries that are listed as side effects on their vaccines. They are selling us the albuterol inhalers for our children’s asthma, the EpiPens, the anti-seizure medications, the Prozac for the depression, the diabetes medications, the arthritis medications, all of these other—and if you look at the top 20 blockbuster drugs for these four companies, virtually all of them are targeted to treat injuries that are listed as a side effect on their own vaccine inserts. It’s a racket. It is the perfect business model: you make people sick the day they are born, you keep making them sick till their 18th birthday, and then you have a permanent customer. Listen, if you get a measles infection, what’s the treatment? A week in bed, chicken soup, and vitamin D. None of that can be patented. Pharma makes nothing on measles. If you have a measles vaccine, and you give that child seizures, and epilepsy, and encephalopathy, and all these other injuries, you have a permanent customer for life. It’s the perfect business model, but it’s killing our country....[0:32:29]
KIRBY: Let me ask you both: what is Fauci’s role in all of this? He’s been at the NIAID for, what, four decades? Does he benefit from this somehow? He seems to be at the center of the nexus of all this.
MIKOVITS: Well, he funds six billion dollars so the other end of that for scientists who are working, NIAID funds six billion dollars of research. If investigators don’t publish in these journals, or they give a message of inconvenient truth, he pulls the funding and the journals go on—as we talked about in my case—to destroy the reputation of the scientist. So, if the scientists don’t publish in these journals, they don’t get grants, they don’t get work. They lose their jobs, and it’s a vicious cycle. And that is what was happening and the other authors in my case, they got grant funding from Tony Fauci to—you either end up like Judy Mikovits and you’re no longer in science, or worse—and they’ve gotten millions, tens of millions of dollars of grants. Even Robert Silverman in his laboratory since 2012, for publishing those studies or retracting those studies that were, in fact, fraud. For going along—
KIRBY: What’s Fauci in it for? Is he in it for money or power?
KENNEDY: Let me explain the essence, the dynamic of corruption: Tony Fauci is—you have a vaccine program that is corrupt, because the vaccines are not safety-tested. And so, a huge amount of research goes into creating fraudulent studies to prove that vaccines are safe, when they are not. And so, for example, when they needed to create studies to persuade people that vaccines don’t cause autism, they funded about 17 studies that they have, that’s their archive. Meanwhile, we have 1,400 independent studies that show it is causing autism and these other injuries, but they have 17 studies, and that’s what they show the New York Times, and they say, “Look, it’s proven.”...
Autism doesn’t show up till your 4.2 [years] on average. So, if you are looking at kids who are between 1 and 10, and if you really want to look for autism, you’ll just look at the kids who are between 8 and 10 years old. What they do is they look at the kids who are between 1 and 7 years old. And the autism disappears. And then those groups are overmatched, meaning they—it’s like studying, looking for lung cancer by studying a group that smoked 20 cigarettes a day for 20 years, and a group that smoked 22 cigarettes a day for 20 years, rather than looking at a group that didn’t smoke anything. And that’s what you would do, if you wanted to know the answer. But Tony Fauci would never fund one of those studies. He funds the phony studies that are designed to give cover to the industry. He’s like the Bill Gates of funding. If you want to do science in the United States of America, you’ve got to be friends with Tony Fauci. Because he controls all the funding that’s going to the universities, to the individuals, to the grants, the research centers. If you make an enemy of him, he not only controls all of that funding, that federal funding, but he has the power to stop anybody else who’s going to fund you, like Gates or whatever, from giving you funding. So, he can blackball you for life. And that’s what he did to Judy. She can no longer do science because it costs money to do science, and there’s no money.
And Tony Fauci can cut off that money. So, his posture is that he is going to protect a crooked corrupt vaccine program no matter—that he helped design—no matter what. And that’s what he does.
KIRBY: What’s in it for him? I mean, why—is it just the power of that position, or does he have to cover his—
KENNEDY: If you’re asking what that position does, he’s the most powerful—in his field, in science, he’s the most powerful man in science, in the world. Without question. He controls all that funding. People are begging him for his opinion, for his good will, for his—he’s as powerful as Bill Gates, because he can dictate global health policy. He can tell what study’s going to be done, and what study’s not going to be done, and what the outcome of that study is. He knows in advance, because he approves the study protocol. He’s going to make sure that study doesn’t find anything. So, he’s locked into that position because he can’t afford to leave it. He’s got to stay there till he dies. Like so many of the people at CDC who were involved in the corruption. They can’t let somebody come in behind them and say, “Oh my god, look what this guy did!” They need to die in those chairs.
And Tony Fauci is one of those guys who spent 50 years in an escalating—corruption always is a vortex; it gets larger and larger. He may have started off, somewhere, 40 years ago, just doing one crooked study, but now, in order to hold—they have piled fraud, upon fraud, upon fraud, upon fraud, and the structure they have created with their vaccine program is so tall and so unwieldy, if somebody kicks out even a single brick, the whole thing will tumble. His function is to make sure that brick doesn’t get kicked out. Every little leak in the dam is plugged with one of his crooked studies and that’s a full-time job, even when you’ve got six billion dollars a year.
Mikovits: Wearing the mask literally activates your own virus. You’re getting sick from your own reactivated coronavirus expressions, and if it happens to be SARS-CoV-2, then you’ve got a big problem.Can you explain in more detail what you’re suggesting?
It’s not clear what Mikovits means by “coronavirus expressions.” There is no evidence that wearing a mask can activate viruses and make people sick.
“Fact-checking Judy Mikovits, the controversial virologist attacking Anthony Fauci in a viral conspiracy video,” 8 May 2020
Judy Mikovits: Eight percent of our of our genome is a virome. That is all of the exposures that we’ve had and we clear and we develop immune responses to. Many are latent like herpes viruses, like those retroviruses, they’re dormant Your immune system has in balance. They’re not expressed.
If you put on a mask and you’re exercising and you’re not breathing air, you’re actually breathing CO2, you can become, it’s called Lactic Acidosis, so you become acid and you’re actually denying yourself oxygen, hypoxia and then some. It’s immune suppressive. It suppresses your very CD4 positive T cells, that adaptive memory immunity. So you activate the dormant because your memory was keeping those silent.
The map below features some of the projects Bloomberg is pursuing through his foundation including: behavioral economic nudges, blockchain identity, digital governance, labor market analytics, performance-based government contracting, and interoperable data systems. It is important to note in the upper left corner of the map his involvement with the Global Parliament of Mayors and their advancement of vaccinations as a key area of interest. Lots of data here. Lots of data to train AI.
Wrench in the Gears, 17 May 2020
A Skeptical Parent’s Thoughts on Digital Curriculum
Bill and Melinda Gates have leading roles to play in the unfolding drama that is Covid-19. Everything seems to be advancing according to Davos’s plan. The soon-to-be trillionaire couple has provided useful cover for their fellow billionaires, the ones backstage pulling the ropes that will drop the Fourth Industrial Revolution scenery for the techno-fascist second act. Even now a chorus line of contact tracers assembles in the wings. In short order they’ll take center stage – donning newly minted digital certificates of compliance and indoctrination. This post is about one of the production’s underwriters, Michael Bloomberg. Bloomberg, in coordination with New York governor Andrew Cuomo, paid Johns Hopkins to choreograph this viral surveillance roll out with the Rockefeller Foundation looking on from the royal box.
Trying to stay “safe” is nowhere near as important as trying to stay HUMANThis is the new morphing of Trump hatred, the new way to pretend to be murdered by Trump, and get love from all your friends, who never heard of Lynn Margulis, and who think Fauci is a savior, as opposed to a mobster. He’s not a scientist. I know what a scientist is, what a scientist sounds like. They don’t accuse people of murder, for one thing. I’m angry too. But as is always the case, their anger has the wheel and mine is an oppressed minority. Today, I tweeted this: Covid is code for de-humanization on an industrial scale. It is rooted in the little scorpion we once called “political correctness” which stripped out humanistic moral code and replaced it with militant stances. Millennials the target generation. The offer: “No need to FEEL.”
EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Robert Kennedy Jr. Destroys Big Pharma, Fauci & Pro-Vaccine Movement, (2:19:45, mp3) valuetainment, 2 May 2019, auto-gen’d transcripts: with timestamps, without timestamps
Robert F Kennedy Jr talks vaccines, Dr Fauci, family history and JFK assassination with Patrick Bet-David
Childrens Health Defense: childrenshealthdefense.org
Instagram: @robertfkennedyjr instagram.com/robertfkennedyjr/
• Horsemen of the Apocalypse: The Men Who Are Destroying Life on Earth—And What It Means for Our Children (2017)
• Thimerosal: Let the Science Speak: The Evidence Supporting the Immediate Removal of Mercury—a Known Neurotoxin—from Vaccines (2015)
My party, the Democratic Party is the worst on this issue. It’s very odd to me that they’re mandating these vaccines that are untested. How can you mandate any medication for a human being? How can you tell somebody, We are gonna force you to take a medication that you don’t want to take? We signed a treaty, the Nuremberg Charter, after World War Two because the Nazis were doing that. They were testing vaccines on people and all these other medical treatments and we said that is a war crime. We don’t do that to people. And we signed the Siracusa Principles, UN Charter on Human Rights, Helsinki Accords, the Nuremberg Charter—all of those say in them, you cannot give a medication to somebody against their will even if a life of the nation is at stake. That’s a quote.
58. No state party shall, even in time of emergency threatening the life of the nation, derogate from the Covenant’s guarantees of the right to life; freedom from torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and from medical or scientific experimentation without free consent; freedom from slavery or involuntary servitude; the right not to be imprisoned for contractual debt; the right not to be convicted or sentenced to a heavier penalty by virtue of retroactive criminal legislation; the right to recognition as a person before the law; and freedom of thought, conscience and religion. These rights are not derogable under any conditions even for the asserted purpose of preserving the life of the nation.And yet we’re mandating these drugs and not only are we forcing people to take one and we know they cause injury. The Vaccine Court has paid out four billion dollars. And they are severely limited, those judgments. Even HHS admits at the Vaccine Court, fewer than 1% of injuries ever gets reported or awarded. So make that four hundred billion. We know they cause a lot of injuries. Even if they cause one injury how can you force a human being to take it against their will? It makes no sense.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)Permissible Medical Experiments
Robert Kennedy, Jr.:
Fauci has a bias towards vaccines and he owns the vaccine. So he has the patents. He literally owns vaccine patents.
Is it purely profit motivation, is [it] purely profit?
No. I think it’s power. And I think the same is true with Gates. Both of them actually stand to make huge amounts of money, potentially billions of dollars. I don’t believe—it’s very hard to look into another man’s brain and I try not to do that. But just looking at them I really believe that their motivation is more about power. And there is no more powerful position than being a health official because you can literally dictate. At this point, Tony Fauci has powers that no American president has ever had. He’s telling people in California: You can’t go to the beach, You can’t go in the ocean, You can’t go shop, Your kids can’t go to school, You have to stay in your house. Two days ago they were giving thousand dollar tickets to people who were swimming in the ocean and surfing. No president’s ever had that kind of power before. But today Fauci, who’s very very close partners with Gates, are telling America and what they’re saying—if you listen carefully—what they’re saying is: You all are are gonna stay in the house until we have a vaccine. It’s not gonna be safe to come out. And that is a tremendous power to tell people they have to wait and do that until you get a vaccine.
Wrench in the Gears, 19 Apr 2020
A Skeptical Parent’s Thoughts on Digital Curriculum
Over the past month, the gaze of investigative researchers has been fixed on GAVI, Bill Gates, Gates’s associates like Fauci, and the over-size influence they are having on public health policy around Covid-19. Use the link for the map [above] to dig further into the relationships. The members of the 2012 Development Impact Bond (DIB) Working Group Report are of particular interest, since DIBs are being considered as a way to finance vaccination campaigns. Public health is a servant of bond markets and financiers. A glance at the participants in this working group makes it clear, doses and people and death and suffering are just going to be part of their market analysis. For too many people, openly discussing concerns about vaccines remains a third-rail. But we DO have to learn how to talk about this to one another, because the stakes are too damn high to shy away from it. I also believe these campaigns and the tracking systems associated with them have been structured as an imperial enterprise and should be treated with profound caution.
My name is Brian C. Procter MD, and I have been a Board-Certified Family Physician in McKinney, Texas for 20 years. It is my understanding that some are trying to get to the truth about Covid-19, and there is a lot of misleading information out there. If patients get sick enough to be admitted to the hospital, effective treatment is limited, and the complication rate is high. But what happens when we treat patients 3-6 weeks earlier, when they first develop symptoms? I have been treating COVID-19 patients in the outpatient trenches for over 3 months now. I am using Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, Losartan, Aspirin, and Zinc, all available for less than $50 cash from most pharmacies, saving individual and/or insurance company healthcare dollars best spent elsewhere. We have identified, diagnosed, and successfully treated these patients at a relatively early point in the course of the disease. It is these statistics that are amazing. I have treated over 100 patients without a single ER visit or need for hospitalization with advanced care. I know one colleague who has treated over 400 patients with the same success. Although there have been no unexpected side effects, including no cardiovascular problems related to Hydroxychloroquine, one should remember it is possible for any drug to have undesirable side effects as evidenced by various TV commercials. We are two community docs using EARLY AGGRESSIVE OUTPATIENT TREATMENT to handle the disease with a 100% success rate (ZERO Admissions) and no cardiovascular side effects using meds that have been around for decades.
Therefore, if we can treat patients EARLY for $50, we seem to be successful at preventing hospitalizations, ICUs, and death not to mention saving 10’s of thousands of dollars per sick patient. My local ICU doctors have pleaded with me to keep doing what I am doing. The answer seems to be EARLY AGGRESSIVE OUTPATIENT TREATMENT and NOT contact tracing, quarantine (destroys millions of lives financially, physically, and emotionally), wearing masks (may be beneficial indoors or in large crowds, but it is not a practical long term solution for the general public, and, to date, there are no studies to support continuous mask use by the general public ), a vaccine (we won’t have it until next year—SARS and MERS died out so this likely will too), social distancing (which won’t sustain our GDP with 25% or even 75% occupancy), testing (ALL tests have a high false negative rate up of at least 20%), or watchful waiting (a tactic that has contributed to over 100,000 deaths). We could also place all nursing home patients and health care personnel on HCQ prophylaxis for 180 days on a voluntary basis of course. This could theoretically prevent thousands of needless hospitalizations and deaths and the spread of the virus.
In conclusion, if we treat COVID-19 like similar flus, pneumonia, hypertension, diabetes, or even a simple sinus infection using early, aggressive therapy that has shown a high rate of success while costing much less than a hospital stay, then we, as a nation, would be far better off rather than be stymied by a constant barrage of numbers that become meaningless because of the confusion of surrounding data collection. Rather than using information as a political tool, the American people should be made aware of successful, alternative options, allowing them to choose what course to follow (right to try). This information on a course of treatment that thus far has shown to be safe and effective when used early and with patients eligible for outpatient care, would help to erase some of the fear that has been generated by the media with overemphasis on hospitalization and possible severe complications and death. Knowing treatment is readily available from one’s own family doctor needs to be part of the model for this and future similar pandemics...and there will be more!
Twenty-Three years ago, I took the Hippocratic Oath. It is posted in my lobby. It is my creed and promise to my patients. The FDA, CDC, NIH, and the WHO are not mentioned in this Oath anywhere. This IS the REAL story. This crisis has become political in the way it has been handled by many states, and this crisis should be about saving the lives of people all over the world and not about the endless struggle between two political parties. My heart goes out to the millions of people who have suffered in the wake of this pandemic. If all PCPs would use this regimen as one of the options they can offer patients early on, the brunt of this pandemic could end in a few weeks, acquired immunity would continue to occur at a more normal rate, and we won’t be faced with the problems related to when and if a vaccine is developed before the next round of the virus surfaces. While I fully realize this data is far from representing a randomized double-blinded controlled clinical trial, we need to go to war with what we have. We need a grass root movement to cure this pandemic. Please circulate this to everyone you know: social media, politicians, doctors, friends, and family. With hope, faith, love, dedication, and perseverance, together we can end this pandemic without destroying any more lives. Please help us end this crisis! Serious inquirers about details and treatment can contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org. BELIEVE, and we can get our lives and country back fast!! 7/2/2020
Brian C. Procter MD
A parent came to me last week and said, “I tried to take my eight-year-old daughter to the beach. She grabbed my leg and she said, ‘Daddy, we can’t go to the beach.’” And he said “Why can’t we go to the beach?” She said, “Daddy, because there are other people there.” This little girl was completely well and completely healthy until this pandemic began.
The pandemic in my mind is not so much a medical pandemic. It’s an emotional pandemic and this emotional pandemic is based on and centered around fear. The fear is real but it’s not based on reality. I have tried to provide facts, data, statistics, information to my patients and their parents for weeks and months. Some of them do listen. Some of them do change their minds because they believe that there is probably more going on than what they’re being told and what they’re being told is probably not entirely accurate and a lot of it is misinformation.
But very many of my parents and children don’t respond to information. I’m a big proponent of facts and a big proponent of information. I’m a big proponent of science. I’m a physician. That’s how I was trained. But I also know that unless we deal with this fear, and we take it and face it head on, the information will not be of use.
You cannot use information, no matter how accurate it is, unless you are in a calm state of mind. Anybody who’s worked in the military knows this. When you are in a state of panic, when you are terrorized, when you are traumatized, you cannot think clearly.
Most of the adults in my practice with children that come in for treatment are in that state. They are not responsive to information. They are allowing fear to guide their decisions. They’re refusing to bring their children in. They’re insisting on zoom or telephone calls. They’re preventing their children from playing outside. They’re preventing their children from going shopping with them. They’re preventing their children from participating in sports. They’re coddling their children because they think that that’s what’s best for them.
The children are suffering. In my view this is child abuse. We are training an entire generation of children to live in fear, to live in fear of people. We are training an entire generation of children to live in their parent’s basements until they’re 40 years old so that they can be safe.
I’ve heard this word “safe” for months now. Whenever I hear the word safe I always ask the following question: Compared to what? Compared to driving? As we heard earlier driving is far more dangerous, far far more dangerous than going to school. Safer than staying at home? Children are getting sick at home. They’re getting fat. They’re wetting their beds.
They’re attacking their brothers and sisters with kitchen knives as two children did last week. I heard from the mother. She went to work. She doesn’t have a babysitter. She’s a single mother in Santa Monica. She’s making minimum wage. She got a call from her neighbor saying the police are on the way. Why? I heard screaming. She rushes home. She finds out that her children have been fighting with knives.
These children are good kids but they didn’t know what to do. They went off zoom after five minutes. They were bored. They got into an argument. One of the kids ate the other kid’s watermelon. And pretty soon they’re attacking one another with knives.
Is she going to lose her children? I don’t know. She’s a good mother, but what can she do? She has to choose: stay home, go on unemployment, or go to work. When she heard that the schools were going to be closed for another year she burst in tears she said I’m going to send my kids back to their home country. We can’t survive. Other parents have told me the same thing.
Letter from the madhouse
The media campaign of 11 September 2001 proved to leaders that it is possible with modern technology to bamboozle millions of people without firing a single shot. Goebbels was unable to achieve this feat. The campaign has left millions still believing until today that 9/11 was the work of Islamic fanatics. One would never have dreamt that in the internet era, the majority of university graduates will fall prey to such an absurd fairy tale.
This successful experiment in mass manipulation is now being repeated with even more spectacular results. Whereas in 2001 the effects of the media campaign were limited to filling the minds of millions with images of Osama bin Laden and scaring them against fake terrorists, the current campaign goes further. It proves the ability of leaders to manipulate not only the beliefs but also the material behavior of the masses by telling them what to do. Entire peoples obey like small children the orders of professional liars who are not even their parents. China and Israel with their all-out mass surveillance systems, recording every action of every citizen, constitute the wet dream of Western leaders. They go to China and Israel and admire how orderly and obedient the masses are disciplined. Corona has given them the right tool to direct people, no matter how absurd the order. It will probably still take another mass propaganda campaign to ensure that Western peoples will stand in queue and beg to be led by Big Brother. Dissidents will be sent to « education camps », the Chinese method.
I have never before lived in a madhouse. It’s a new experience, rather unpleasant, I must say. But we three family members survive the birthpangs of the new age of state terrrorism thanks to music, the garden and our love of free thought.
—Elias Davidsson, 25 April 2020
Covid-19 Death Numbers Exaggerated
A growing chorus—of ordinary citizens and world-renowned medical and scientific experts—is raising questions about matters ranging from the coronavirus’s origins to the rationale for continued lockdowns.†
“On the Possible Origins of Coronavirus, Part 1,” Toby Rogers, Ph.D. & Team, Children’s Health Defense, 7 May 2020
† “A Timeline—Pandemic and Erosion of Freedoms Have Been Decades in the Making,” Children’s Health Defense Team, 21 May 2020
The court’s ruling is a long text. I provide below a summary of the key passage.The court’s main points are as follows:
This is a transript of Alison McDowell’s presentation complete with all slides inlined. The talk itself ends at 13:16. Afterwards, it gets very interesting at 13:52 when moderator Naomi Klein states “I personally am not comfortable with, um, you know, a framework that is presenting the pandemic as a conspiracy”, and McDowell engages her in a spirited back-and-forth regarding this. Below the transcript, at the beginning of the “Thoughts on ‘Who Voted In Davos?’” comments, Simone writes:
This is important work, and a gift of researchable sites and sources. However, after fully digesting your information and recognizing the connections you make, I really very much wanted to hear what Naomi Klein could possibly say to argue against your points. Talking over her did harm to our cause, I think, undermining your authority as the mother and researcher and truth-tell you are, not to mention we lost the opportunity to allow one of these apologists to have enough ‘rope to hang themselves.’ They have no legitimacy and they will go too far, and we need to learn to stand firm, and quiet, and let them. This is a form of fighting as well.To which McDowell responds:
You are certainly entitled to your opinion, however what you are not privy to was that this was a three-hour event where she provided wrap up of remarks after all five panelists presented. She did not mention the content I presented in her response and specifically excluded me in directing follow up questions. I had to be asked to be put on stack. Whenever I spoke she turned off her camera. She had the opportunity to respond, and she chose not to, because she is part of the group that is rolling out digital ID and everything I spoke about. I think it must have come as a shock how much I was able to share in fifteen minutes.After the end of the part at Rutgers, from 16:56 on, McDowell describes more of her background and perspective on what is currently in process globally, providing a summary aspect of her cogent analyses (amplified throughout Wrench In The Gears) on Digital ID and Blockchain Identity. At the end of this (starts at 27:17) she refers to the below 2019 NAACP statement on risks of Blockchain Identity.
We just have to be really clear about these technologies. In that respect I collaborated on a resolution that was passed in California and later at the national meeting of the NAACP last summer in Detroit where they wrote a resolution saying that no one should be compelled to create a digital identity to access public benefits. That includes education, health care, housing, judicial involvement—no one should make you create a digital identity to access these things. It was unanimously passed with exception of some small group in Brooklyn that was looking to data mine kids in New York City schools.Resolution against Blockchain Identity passed by the NAACP in 2019, pages 62-63 of “RESOLUTIONS SUBMITTED UNDER ARTICLE IX, SECTION 1 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE NAACP 2019”:
So that passed. That exists and there’s a model. So it’s not just random people saying this is a problem. It’s the NAACP looking at racial capitalism in the context of blockchain. But meanwhile currently in Chula Vista, California, which is an area of San Diego, students are being asked to give blood tests for Covid on Blockchain. Think about that. Essentially what we’re saying is that children, to have right of face-to-face education, are having their blood—bodily fluids—taken and uploaded to a blockchain health record. That is happening through their school district and no one’s talking about that yet. And nobody really knows about this Blockchain Resolution.
When we talk about abolition, for me, I feel like this is the next Abolition Movement, is Blockchain Identity. Because if we agree to become data commodities with privacy to protect us from surveillance it’s over. I think that’s really important for people to know because no mainstream media is going to put that out and it’s not fake news because you can google it; they have the PDF of their 2019 resolutions online, it's page 62.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY1. Opposition to the Use of the Blockchain Identity
WHEREAS, Blockchain technologies are being developed as tools of digital identity management; and
WHEREAS, transaction data pertaining to vital records, voting, ownership, healthcare, professional and educational credentials, employment, and financial income can be stored on Blockchain systems; and
WHEREAS, global technology interests are placing heavy pressure on governments to scale Blockchain adoption as a financial tool within proposals to privatize public services, including Public-Private Partnerships (P3); and
WHEREAS, governmental interests are exploring the use of “smart contracts” on Blockchain as a means of delivering public benefits; and
WHEREAS, public benefits distributed via “smart contracts” can incorporate coded interventions that preference specific behavioral outcomes; and
WHEREAS, the use of “programmable money/digital currency” may undermine the ability of benefit recipients to make autonomous economic choices and indenture the future wealth of such populations; and
WHEREAS, aggregation of an individual’s public benefit data within a Blockchain identity system could exacerbate punitive profiling of recipients of services; and
WHEREAS, prototypes linking Blockchain systems to profit extraction through social impact investment initiatives have already been developed; and
WHEREAS, hundreds of billions of dollars have already been directed into social impact investments by the world’s most powerful individuals and financial institutions; and
WHEREAS, consolidation of personal data in Blockchain identity systems will position the global poor who receive benefits via smart contracts to become data backbones upon which “impact” metrics would rest, in effect amplifying investment wealth of elite investors on the backs of vulnerable communities; and
WHEREAS, researchers have warned of the harms of relying on Blockchain systems, given the immutable nature of the technology that would mean false data and/or embedded vulnerabilities would never fully be able to be reversed, remedied, redacted, nor deleted; and
WHEREAS, security flaws are already rampant in Blockchain systems that claim to be secure, leading to the compromised integrity of the systems, and to highly sensitive personal information being vulnerable to exploitation.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the NAACP opposes any state or federal legislation that would require an individual to create a Blockchain identity in order to receive any public services or benefits, including but not limited to education, healthcare, addiction treatment, behavioral health services, law enforcement, housing, and/or food and nutrition.
IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the NAACP will engage in community education efforts to communicate to the public about the structure, function, benefits and inherent risks of Blockchain technologies.
© Associated Press
I think this is a very strong effort by the public health establishment to beat down any questions about the efficacy and side effects of lockdowns, an effort abetted and even driven by places like the Times. Nearly the entire media is on board here, and the issue has become incredibly politicized. When I worked for the Times, it leaned left, but it was basically center-left, a voice of the establishment, and the bias was more in the story selection than anything else. Reporters were expected to (and did) write with relative objectivity, avoid snark and opinion, make sure they gave the subjects of articles or the targets of investigations a chance to respond. We knew the rules and we basically followed them. Didn’t mean we couldn’t write strong investigative pieces (I wrote plenty), but we didn’t have politics on every page. That’s gone now.As for myself—longtime Times subscriber, and author of four Times op eds, and co-author of a fifth—I find myself wishing every day that I could spare myself the agony of scanning it; but, as a student of propaganda, I have an intellectual and civic duty to peruse it, so I have to suck it up, in hopes of getting others to perceive how really bad it is.
Off Guardian Coronavirus Factchecker#6: Does wearing a mask do anything?, 6 Jun 2020
Governments around the world are enforcing facial coverings to prevent SARS-Cov-2 infection, but does the science support their use?#5: Infection-Fatality Ratio Update, 23 May 2020
The more data we gather, the more obvious it becomes that early fatality rate estimates were MASSIVELY exaggerated#4: “Why are so many healthcare workers dying?”, 27 Apr 2020
Media reports paint a picture of healthcare workers being hit very hard by the pandemic, but the statistics suggest otherwise#3: Covid19 is 20x DEADLIER than the flu!, 11 Apr 2020
One of the buzz-stats doing the rounds says this novel virus is far more dangerous than influenza. Does the science hold up?#2: “The Emergency Powers Will Only Last 2 years!”, 8 Apr 2020
Defenders of the Coronavirus Act claim the “extreme measures” are only temporary, but is that true?#1: “Covid19 is having an unprecedented impact on ICUs”, 2 Apr 2020
The media claim this pandemic’s effect on hospitals around the world has never been seen before, but is that true?
“Lockdown only pushes the severe cases into the future – it will not prevent them”“Prof Giesecke from Sweden Lances it in the Lancet,” Keith Rushworth, Epidemiology Explained, 6 May 2020
—Prof. Johan Giesecke
“The invisible pandemic,” Johan Giesecke, The Lancet, 5 May 2020
These facts have led me to the following conclusions. Everyone will be exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and most people will become infected. COVID-19 is spreading like wildfire in all countries, but we do not see it—it almost always spreads from younger people with no or weak symptoms to other people who will also have mild symptoms. This is the real pandemic, but it goes on beneath the surface, and is probably at its peak now in many European countries. There is very little we can do to prevent this spread: a lockdown might delay severe cases for a while, but once restrictions are eased, cases will reappear. I expect that when we count the number of deaths from COVID-19 in each country in 1 year from now, the figures will be similar, regardless of measures taken.
Measures to flatten the curve might have an effect, but a lockdown only pushes the severe cases into the future—it will not prevent them. Admittedly, countries have managed to slow down spread so as not to overburden health-care systems, and, yes, effective drugs that save lives might soon be developed, but this pandemic is swift, and those drugs have to be developed, tested, and marketed quickly. Much hope is put in vaccines, but they will take time, and with the unclear protective immunological response to infection, it is not certain that vaccines will be very effective.
In summary, COVID-19 is a disease that is highly infectious and spreads rapidly through society. It is often quite symptomless and might pass unnoticed, but it also causes severe disease, and even death, in a proportion of the population, and our most important task is not to stop spread, which is all but futile, but to concentrate on giving the unfortunate victims optimal care.
Wrench in the Gears, 19 Apr 2020
A Skeptical Parent’s Thoughts on Digital Curriculum
Vaccines will be the bread and butter for impact investors; but then factor in the crushing human and economic costs of global pandemic, and suddenly you’re talking REAL money. Imagine tallying up ALL the costs associated with the Covid-19 lockdown. That is going to create one ENORMOUS cost offset for investors moving forward. The longer the lockdown the bigger the cost offset they will be able to use in “pay for success” pandemic deals. For this first round there is a certain sick market logic in making the situation as dire as possible. Future profits are riding on calculations of harm that are being tallied now.
“Quantum Materials Announces QDX(TM) HealthID to Support Back-to-Work ‘Immunization Passport’ Programs,” Stockhouse, 13 Apr 2020
Wrench in the Gears, 17 May 2020
A Skeptical Parent’s Thoughts on Digital Curriculum
Bloomberg and the technocrats have been very diligent in their cooptation of the non-profit / third sector, creating systems of data extraction cloaked in the benevolent trappings of cardboard checks and glittering galas. Global health has been the focus of much subterfuge. Gates and Bloomberg united to tackle tobacco use, family planning, polio, and most recently “economic mobility.” All, of course, are impact investment markets. It is worth noting that Event 201, the corona virus tabletop exercise held at the Pierre Hotel in New York last October, was a joint enterprise of the Gates Foundation and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, an initiative of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of public health. Within the school of public health is the Center for Health Security that hosted both pandemic simulations – Clade-X in 2018 and Event 201 in 2019. The program is also a partner in the Global Health Security Index, an effort of the Nuclear Threat Initiative. Ted Turner, a founding director of the United Nations Foundation and another member of “The Good Club” started the Nuclear Threat Initiative. During Bloomberg’s time on the Johns Hopkins board he developed a collaborative relationship with faculty around issues of public health and eventually became know as the “public health” mayor. New York was his test bed, and over the past fifteen years Bloomberg Philanthropies has poured hundreds of millions of dollars into tobacco control, obesity, and gun control.
Universal Biometric ID
Wrench in the Gears, 19 Apr 2020
A Skeptical Parent’s Thoughts on Digital Curriculum
A glance over the participant list shows high-level executives from Edelman (public relations) and NBC Universal; George Gao, director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention; as well as a number of groups, including Johnson and Johnson and GAVI, that have a stake in vaccine trials underway. While the event was held in New York, there were also participants representing Australia, Canada, Switzerland, China, and the United Nations.
First, I am a registered voting Democrat. These, however, are the facts:
As of June 20, 2020, US states led by Republican governors, or states known to use hydroxychloroquine, have lower death rates, out of both #cases and millions of people, than states led by Democratic governors or states that restrict hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) availability for COVID19 patients.
State Action on Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine Access
The states that seem to be using HCQ are CO, FL, AZ, TX, and UT (which restricts the use of HCQ for COVID-19 patients to 7 days’ dosage, helping to avoid overdoses).
States restricting the use of HCQ for COVID19 patients are NY, RI, DC, MD, MS, MN, GE, NV, WV, MT, OR, VA, ID, AR, SD.
Please let me know if you think I am wrong about any of these states. Thank you.
See https://www.facebook.com/kathy.dopp to view the data (shown below)
Mark Crispin Miller: Why the left should oppose lockdown (and would, if it really were devoted to the interests of the underclass), News From Underground, 10 Jul 2020
Today’s “left” has not opposed lockdowns because it’s not really “left” at all, but just another outlet for the COVID-19 propaganda, as it’s long since been corrupted by the CIA funds poured into it through pass-throughs like the Ford Foundation.
Mission Statement & Principles
Millions Against Medical Mandates is a solution-based think tank of organizations and individuals invested in and working for freedom from mandated and coerced medical interventions. Our coalition partners include individuals in the fields of medicine, health, science, law, journalism, publishing, business, politics, activism, education, medically injured adults and children, and families of the medically injured — all of whom support informed consent and individual choice.
We the undersigned, work to end medical tyranny, promote true health, return to sound ethics, and we collectively uphold the following principles:
“... the WHO cannot collect and rely on potentially biased studies to make recommendations that can have devastating effects (see below) on the lives of literally billions. Rather, the WHO must apply a stringent standards threshold, and accept only randomized controlled trials with verified outcomes. In this application, the mere fact that several such quality studies have not ever confirmed the positive effects reported in bias-susceptible reports should be a red flag.”and
“It is an unjustified authoritarian imposition, and a fundamental indignity, to have the State impose its evaluation of risk on the individual, one which has no basis in science, and which is smaller than a multitude of risks that are both common and often created or condoned by the State.”
I would like to conclude by emphasizing once again why we are already setting up this ACU, the Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, at this point. We don’t want to wait for the parliaments or others, who at some point may come later in the future, because the pressure is on now. People are suffering now, and many people have already been injured, some have even lost their lives. Just as it was predicted in the internal report of the Federal Ministry of the Interior. People have died because of the government measures! And that is obviously not proportionate.
Another reason why it is so urgent, that we have to take it into our own hands now, especially when no one else is doing it who might be more called upon, is a circumstance that I would like to mention again. All over the world there are people whose heart stops beating. Everyone has a 100% risk that at some point their heart will stop beating.
The good news is, it is possible to revive, to resuscitate, and there is a guideline on how to do it. And this guideline was changed internationally at the beginning of April, and in that course, it was also changed in Germany. And this guideline, you have to imagine that, now says, “because of the high risk of infection with CoVid-19 and the high damage that could be caused by it” mouth-to-mouth resuscitation should now no longer be performed, just imagine that. You should now put a cloth over your mouth. This means that many, many more people in the world will die now, because it is scientifically proven that if you press and provide mouth-to-mouth, many more people survive. And that way,excess mortality is produced for statistics. We have to reverse this resuscitation guideline.
Because, as we can actually see, and as we will be able to prove comprehensively in this inquiry committee, we do not have the plague or the killer virus. This is good news!
But we really must ask ourselves: Why is it the way it is? Why are these measures in place? Who benefits?
We don’t want to wait until we, our friends and our relatives suffer personal and physical damage. We have to work together now!
And I can only invite you, because we are not backed by a corporation or media corporation, any rich people, or foundations. The better we are equipped with resources, the more professionally and faster we can do this work, also internationally. We will also publish our work in several languages to the best of our ability. Everyone is invited to help us out here, in the best public spirit. And therefore,I thank you very, very much for all the support you have given us this far.
Thank you very much.
Promotes a collection of works created by children who
lost their rights to a public education. They have suffered,
they have cried, yet they have persevered! They are talented,
creative, HEALTHY and most of all, THEY ARE WIDE AWAKE!
Poem By 16 Year old, Luca
I walked home from school today
I have always been told
I walked home from school today
At the end of the line there stood a man
I walked home from school today
I said a word so shockingly sound
My teacher turned with a frightening face
I told them that there was a choice
Feeling a rather confused way
Why should we be refused to grow
For having the courage to say “No”
Covid19 Q and A
Sixteen Simple Answers to the Top Questions
Keith Rushworth 6 May 2020
1 My Husband and I made love last night. I read in the Daily Mirror that we should have worn masks, but we didn’t. Will we die? Yes you will. But not of Covid19. 2 My Granddad is 93. He has diabetes, dementia, and heart issues and lives in a care home. What is his life expectancy with this deadly virus around? About the same. 3 Is Boris Johnson able to run the country properly without Parliament sitting in the normal way? This is a silly question. Our MP’s are happy to sit at home being paid for running the country. Boris’s ability is not an issue, since Dominic Cummings runs the country. 4 My Husband has committed suicide due to the lockdown. He was 25. I am left with a small daughter. Can I claim against the Government for causing his death? Don’t be silly. 5 The epidemic seems to be running down everywhere. If the vaccine is not ready until it’s over, will I still need the vaccine? Definitely. 6 Will the vaccine be dangerous, given that there will have been so little time to produce and safety test it? Of course. 7 I understand that the Government is taking on billions of debt in order to fund the lockdown. How will they repay it? Raise your taxes, cut your services, and possibly sell off the NHS to American Corporations. 8 I understand that children are virtually immune from the virus. But now that schools might reopen, I worry that my little boy might die as a result of going to school. Is that possible? It certainly is. He could be run over by a bus. 9 Is it true that people used to die before Covid19 appeared? I never remember the BBC reporting deaths like they do now. There is some scientific research showing that people did die before Covid19, but none of it has been peer reviewed. I seem to remember a huge number died in the Iraq War, but they were all foreigners. 10 I understand that there are still travel restrictions between different countries, even when the countries concerned both have the virus. Does this make sense? Yes. For example, if you are French you are more likely to die of English Covid, and if you are English you have an estimated 30 times higher risk of death from garlicky French Covid. 11 The Swedes didn’t have a lockdown. Are they all dead now? Of course. Stockholm is now for sale on Rightmove. 12 How can we be so certain that the Chinese lie about their deaths and other things, while our own Government does not? I’m getting tired of answering such idiot questions. Even the Duke of Edinburgh knew the answer to that in the 1980’s when he pointed out that the Chinese have slitty eyes. 13 I’ve heard it said that the docility of the British public in the face of lockdown is equivalent to a Sloth on Valium. Do you agree? What dose of Valium is the Sloth on? 14 Will the Government give us back all our Human Rights when this is over? Dream on. 15 It has been 12 years since the 2008 bank collapse, and we have not fully recovered. Will it take another twelve years to recover from the lockdown collapse? I don’t like to be a pessimist. I know how you feel. But there is this wretched thing called Reality. 16 I feel really, really scared of the Coronavirus. Is there a cure? Stop watching TV News.
“Human Body Activity associated with a task provided to a user may be used in a mining process of a crypocurrency system. A server may provide a task to a device of a user which is communicatively coupled to the server. A sensor communicatively coupled to or comprised in the device of the user may sense body activity of the user. Body activity data may be generated based on the sensed body activity of the user. The cryptocurrency system communicatively coupled to the device of the user may verify if the body activity data satisfies one or more condition set by the cryptocurrency system and award cryptocurrency to the user whose body activity is verified“
Study claiming that asymptomatic people can transmit the new coronavirus was “flawed” (to put it mildly)—from an article that came out on FEBRUARY 3rd!
newsfromunderground, 3 May 2020: Here we all are under house arrest, with healthy people quarantined, and, when they creep out into the desolated world, ordered to wear masks and stay six feet apart—all because of a botched “study” that was expertly refuted three months ago. This is beyond outrageous. How many people have now died, or will die in this new Great Depression, because of that junk science? And—even more important—what will it now take to make this known? Since Il Fauci surely won’t retract his ringing affirmation of that work (“This study lays the question [of asymptomatic transmission] to rest”) “our free press” won’t report it, nor are the proprietors of “social media” likely to enable, or allow, its circulation. So it is up to us, we angry few, to spread the word. Please send this email far and wide. MCM
14 Apr: 50 Headlines: Welcome to the “new normal” 25 Apr: 50 Headlines Darker: More of the “New Normal”
“Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed; everything else is public relations.”
Mark Crispin Miller: This new study (scroll down) reconfirms the findings of some prior research into the COVID-19 threat posed by children. I sent this one out last month:
No known case of teacher catching coronavirus from pupils, says scientist, The Times, 21 Jul 2020
And, in late June, I sent out this one:
COVID-19 Transmission and Children: The Child is Not to Blame, Pediatrics, DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-004879
So now we have another study reconfirming, again, that schoolchildren “pose little threat” of killing off their teachers with “the coronavirus.”
But what difference can these findings make to schoolteachers (and professors) whose frontal lobes have been wiped out by fear? Unfortunately, none; because these “educators” are too terrified to take in anything that contradicts the fear-porn that they feed on, night and day, and that they share hysterically, obsessively, almost salaciously online, where they can always find more propaganda to ingest and barf back up at one another. Send them anything that contradicts the deadly narrative, and they just don’t reply. If you happen to run into one who’s slunk out, masked, to run some nervous errand, and tell them something that refutes the narrative, and that (you’d think) might therefore ease their fear, they look at you like YOU’RE insane, or even possibly a closet Trump supporter, and hurry off
We have people with advanced degrees, gainfully employed by universities and colleges, demanding that those schools shut down, and wondering aloud if there is not some way to keep the student “hordes” from coming back. (Of course, these people all hate Trump for his hard line on immigrants.) And we have schoolteachers preparing for this next school year by writing up their own obituaries (as reported recently on CNN).
The only upside to this dismal situation is that all those people freaking out like this, having gulped down the whole COVID-19 propaganda narrative hook, line and sinker, should really not be teaching anyone.
In any case, this moment demonstrates the awful truth of David Foster Wallace’s cogent observation “that the people to be most frightened of are the people who are most frightened.”
p.s. If you know anyone who’d like to fund a little college somewhere, preferably where no one has to wear a mask, please let me know.
The art of the smear: How Buzzfeed and other propaganda mills “debunk” those questioning the Official Narrative of COVID-19
As “our free press” ramps up its loyal service as Big Pharma’s Ministry of Truth, it’s doing an ever cruder version of the Propaganda Two-Step, which you perform by pumping out Big Lies non-stop, while also blacking out and/or defaming anyone who dares to contradict or question them. We have an excellent example of the latter tactic in this wad of excrement from Buzzfeed, hurled at six “spin doctors” (i.e., dissident physicians), two “5G conspiracy theorists,” and two of “the misquoted” (two doctors whom Buzzfeed’s minions couldn’t find a way to tar outright). What makes it such a good example is the blatancy of its key features. Note, first, that it does not even address, much less refute, any of the information offered, and/or arguments presented, by the heretics. Instead of actually rebutting what they’ve said or written, this hit-piece (along with countless others) smears the heretics themselves, with mere insulting epithets and vicious mockery. Such propaganda must rely primarily on slander and derision, because what those dissidents have said, about COVID-19 and/or 5G, is either true or highly plausible—which means that the Official Narratives in question are untenable. This is why such hit-pieces are so nakedly authoritarian, “debunking” its targets just by telling us “what the authorities have said.” Thus this piece baldly tells its readers what to think (or, rather, what to feel, since there’s no thought involved), and how to serve as individual vectors of the propaganda; and so it isn’t just a catalogue of smears, concocted to discourage anyone from looking into what those targeted have had to say. It also functions as a sort of script, providing Buzzfeed’s followers with ammo to be used on “social media,” and/or in fights with any infidels among their friends or family. Although the number, unanimity and virulence of such attacks is something new (and grounds for seeing it as a sign of desperation), the basic strategy is over half-a-century old, as it was the CIA that first weaponized the epithet “conspiracy theorist” back in 1967, in its memo #1035-960, sent out to CIA station chiefs worldwide to enlist their help in smearing critics of the Warren Report, not just by calling them “conspiracy theorists,” but also by deploying one or more of several (what we would call) talking points against them. What we’re seeing today is a streamlining of that process. Whereas, back then, the CIA encouraged its media assets to defame those questioning the Official Narrative (of JFK’s assassination), so that readers would then doubt the honesty or sanity of those dissenters. Today, the culture having largely moved online, the propaganda aims directly at its audience, inviting them to spread its toxin all throughout the tissues of the nation, by parroting the memes of the Official Narrative (of COVID-19, 5G, vaccination and whatever else the powers behind the propaganda want the rest of us swallow). Here, for your convenience and enlightenment, is a list of dissidents re: COVID-19, its origins, and/or the policies and practices now being used to “cure” it. This is just a start on such a list of medical professionals. Nor do I necessarily agree with everything those listed here have either said or written—but they have every right to speak their piece, and those of us who care to know what’s really going should give them a fair hearing, and think about it for ourselves.
These Are The Fake Experts Pushing Pseudoscience And Conspiracy Theories About The Coronavirus Pandemic
I titled the talk tonight, Are You Scared Yet? I did that,
despite the fact that Jane Hunter has said, in one interview
at least, that my lectures are like drugs in the sixties
in that they paralyze people with fear and make them
inactive. That’s not anything I’ve ever heard from an
audience but it’s what she said about me. I think, in
fact, my message, when read properly is more that people
should calm down and try to distinguish what they’re
being asked, or told, to be afraid of and what they
ought to be afraid in reality which is generally hidden
from them and the extent to which they ought to be afraid
or ought to act instead.
I also knew a guy years ago when I worked in the anti-psychiatry movement, John Parkin, who said that he wanted to start a national campaign to abolish paranoia by elevating it to realistic fear. There isn’t a term in the English language that’s the opposite of paranoia, unless it’s just complacency. But there isn’t healthy or realistic fear that maybe somebody is doing something to you. William S. Burroughs said, that paranoia is having all the facts. So I try to get as many as I can, ’cause I’m trying to get there.
But my purpose, of course, isn’t to make other people paranoid. My purpose is to hopefully enlighten people about what’s happening around them and what they ought to be putting their focus on. Charlie Manson said, paranoia is heightened awareness. Michael McClure said that even paranoids have enemies. I know I have some. But I don’t spend my life looking over my shoulder, I try to look in front of me and see what’s coming.
—John Judge, “Are You Scared Yet? The War Without an Enemy
Terrorism and the Strategy of Tension,”
Santa Monica, California, 1996
Wrench in the Gears, 19 Apr 2020
A Skeptical Parent’s Thoughts on Digital Curriculum
Pay for success finance deals will be well served by the global vaccine market that is being advanced through Gates’s outfit GAVI. Vaccine doses are readily quantifiable, and the economic costs of many illnesses are straightforward to calculate. With a few strategic grants awarded to prestigious universities and think tanks, I anticipate suitable equations framing out a healthy ROI (return on investment) will be devised to meet global market demands shortly.
“German Microbiologist and Medical Professor Issues Serious Warnings about a COVID Vaccine, Playing Russian Roulette with a Covid-19 Vaccine,” Richard Gale and Gary Null PhD, Progressive Radio Network/Health Impact News, 19 Oct 2020
“The Flu Vaccine is Bad Medicine, The Science against the flu vaccines and Tamiflu: why they are ineffective, unnecessary, and bad medicine,” Jim Meehan, MD, MeehanMD, 28 Sep 2020
“Read the Fine Print: Vaccine Package Inserts Reveal Hundreds of Medical Conditions Linked to Vaccines,” Children’s Health Defense, 14 Apr 2020
“Read the Fine Print—Part Two: Nearly 400 Adverse Reactions Listed in Vaccine Package Inserts,” Children’s Health Defense, 14 Aug 2020
“The Fix Was In: Latest ACIP Meeting’s Public Comments Featured a Who’s Who Among Vaccine Promoters,” Kari Bundy, Children’s Health Defense, 4 Aug 2020
DUAL USE TYRANNY: “Africa to Become Testing Ground for “Trust Stamp” Vaccine Record and Payment System - A new biometric identity platform partnered with the Gates-funded GAVI vaccine alliance and Mastercard will launch in West Africa and combine COVID-19 vaccinations, cashless payments, and potential law enforcement applications.,” Raul Diego, MintPress News, 10 Jul 2020
Mark Crispin Miller: More black lives that don’t matter.
“Measles Vaccination and Autism: The Inexcusable Suppression of a Long-Documented Link,” Children’s Health Defense, 9 Jul 2020a Primer: The Irrefutable Argument Against Vaccine Safety with Author Del Bigtree, (1:35:45, mp3) Feb 2018, auto-gen’d transcripts: with timestamps, without timestamps Presentation covers the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act which fully indemnified pharmaceutical companies from all liability when their vaccine products killed or injured the recipient.
This is the time when we do have the opportunity to understand whether or not there are susceptible children—perhaps genetically, perhaps they have a metabolic issue, mitochondrial disorder, immunological issue—that makes them more susceptible to vaccines plural or to one particular vaccine or to a component of vaccine like mercury.... The fact that there is concern that you don’t want to know that susceptible group is a real disappointment to me. If you know that susceptible group you can save those children. The reason why they didn’t want to look for those susceptibility groups was because they’re afraid that if they found them, however big or small they were, that that would scare the public away. It sounds like you don’t think the hypothesis of a link between vaccines and autism is completely irrational. So when I first heard about it I thought, That doesn’t make sense to me. The more you delve into it, if you look at the basic science, if you look at the research that’s been done on animals, if you also look at some of these individual cases and if you look at the evidence that there is no link what I come away with is the question has not been answered.Did you ever hear that? Head of the National Institute of Health: “question has not been answered.” You’ve buried this and autism is skyrocketing, autoimmune disease is skyrocketing, our children are so sick and yet we’re worried about measles. [1:00:49]
National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) Advocacy Portal
Achieving and protecting the right to informed consent to vaccination is more important now than ever before, and we need your help to make that happen. NVIC wants to help you, our members, to organize and make a difference in your home state right where you live to protect and expand vaccine exemptions. It is at the state level that mass vaccination policies are made, and it is at the state level where your action to protect your rights can have the greatest impact. Also, when national vaccine issues occur, you will be plugged in to the information and action items necessary to make sure your voice is heard.
2016 Documentary: Vaxxed: From Cover-Up To Catastrophe (1:31:00)
2019 Documentary: Vaxxed II: The People’s Truth (1:31:53)
The Highwire with Del Bigtree
“Vaccination Rates Drop to Alarmingly Low Levels During Lockdowns,” Jordan Davidson, EcoWatch, 20 May 2020
“Bill Gates and Intellectual Ventures Funds Microchip Implant Vaccine Technology,” Celeste McGovern, GreenMedInfo.com, 14 Apr 2020Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Vaxxter:
Dr. Larry Palevsky February Presentation to CT Assembly on the Nightmare in Connecticut, film + transcript, Anne Dachel, Age of Autism House AST, 19 Feb 2020
Larry Palevsky, MD answered questions for 28 minutes. He described the appalling lack of studies when it comes to vaccine safety, especially involving the use of aluminum in vaccines and its damaging impact on the brain.
Russian book covering many studies about how dangerous and unsafe vaccines are.
To vaccinate or not to vaccinate? or Well, think about it, an injection! Vaccination Myths, Amantonio, Publishing House AST, 2020
“CDC and WHO Corrupt Financial Entanglements with the Vaccine Industry,” Children’s Health Defense, Sep 2019
“Swine-flu vaccine side-effects so bad ‘that children were like schizophrenics’,” Ralph Riegel, Independent.ie, 3 Sep 2018
Full Transcript: Sacramento: CA SB 276 & SB 714 Signed Into Law by Gov. Newsom, Children’s Health Defense, 9 Sep 2019
CHD Chairman, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., delivers an electrifying speech to advocates at a Sacramento, CA press conference about the passing into law of SB276 & SB714—and asks, “Where are the legal and rational boundaries now that the government can force a medical procedure on children?” He also told the crowd, “Don’t despair. CHD has a plan, we have a strategy and we are going to sue them!” “Every time there is a loss, we get stronger.” “We are going to win.”
Film: RFK. Jr.’s Mic Dropping Speech Inspires Hope Vis-á-Vis The Rise of the Medical Police State (22:03)
Is There A Basis To Believe That Vaccines Contain Blood?
12-page Open Letter from Lawrence B. Palevsky, MD, ABIHM, Apr 2019
“The Only Vaccine Guide a New Parent Will Ever Need,” J.B. Handley, Circle of Docs, 2016
“Vaccine Peer Review, The History Of The Global Vaccination Program In 1000 Peer Reviewed Reports And Studies, 1915-2015,” A Jeff Prager Publication, 2016
“The truth behind the vaccine cover-up, ” Russell L. Blaylock MD, Medical Veritas, 5 (2008) 1714-1726