by
John W. Gofman, Ph.D., M.D.
and Arthur R. Tamplin, Ph.D.
Rodale Press, Emmaus, Pa.
Presented here, in both hypertext and
ASCII text
formats, is a combination of the 1971 and 1979 editions of
Poisoned Power since they are not identical. The
differences in the 1979 reprint are the following:
- Appendices II,
III, and IV
were not included
- Appendix VII,
"Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors in the United States"
was updated
- Chapter Nine's graphic, "Nuclear
Power Plants in the United States", was updated to match
Appendix VII (as well it's first sentence)
- an additional Foreward was
written to augment the text with information on Three Mile
Island and challenge the continuing "Safe and Clean"
nuclear industry propaganda, largely paid for
with tax dollars.
Appendices II-IV of the 1971 version have historical value
for their significance of holding people accountable. The
benefit in demonstrating that facts and insights of 1971
do not automatically become obsolete.
Contents
1971:
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CARD NUMBER 70-155715
ISBN 0-87857-004-7
1979:
Copyright © 1971, 1979 by John W. Gofman and Arthur R. Tamplin
Permission is granted for downloading, copying, and distribution all
or parts of this book, provided that the text and drawings are
reproduced without any alterations.
Printed in the United States of America on recycled paper containing
a high percentage of de-inked fiber.
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
Gofman, John William
Poisoned Power,
Includes biographical references and index.
1. Atomic power-plants--Environmental Aspects.
2. Radioactive pollution. I. Tamplin, Arthur R.,
joint author. II. Title.
TD195.E4G63 1979
333.7 79-16781
ISBN 0-87857-288-0
4 6 8 10 9 7 5 3
From the inside front and back
dust jacket of the 1971 edition :
POISONED POWER
by
John W. Gofman and Arthur R. Tamplin
The Case Against Nuclear Power Plants
- In one year's operation, a single nuclear
power plant generates as much radioactive poison
as one-thousand Hiroshima-type atomic bombs!
- Insurance companies -- experts on
judging risks -- protect themselves
against anticipated claims from private
citizens for nuclear plant accidents and
radioactive damage by specifically
excluding such coverage in contracts.
- The AEC--designated as the public's
"protector"--is charged with promoting
the nuclear industry. This is an
impossible conflict of interest.
- There is "not a shred of evidence" that
AEC radiation standards for peaceful use
of the atom are truly safe.
- Nuclear power is not the sole adequate
source of electricity for the future. There
are efficient alternatives -- cleaner,
cheaper, safer ones.
In 1963 the Atomic Energy Commission
asked Dr. John Gofman and Dr. Arthur
Tamplin to undertake a series of long range
studies on potential dangers that might
arise from the "peaceful uses of the atom."
Assuming that the Atomic Energy Commission
seriously wanted to know the truth about
the safety of nuclear electricity and its
generation, the authors attacked the
problem with gusto.
Here's what they learned:
- Radiation from rapidly expanding
Atomic Energy programs is a far, far
more serious hazard to human life
than anyone had ever conceived it to
be.
- Atomic radiation will result in many
times more deaths from cancer and
leukemia than previously thought
possible. The potential damage to
future generations from genetic
damage has been even more grossly
underestimated.
But far from having their findings welcomed,
Gofman and Tamplin experienced a torrent of
personal and professional condemnation from
the nuclear triumvirate--the U.S. Atomic
Energy Commission, the Joint Committee on
Atomic Energy, and the Electrical Utility
Industry. The authors attribute this to
their announced unshakeable conviction that
the entire nuclear electricity industry
was--and still is--developing under a set of
totally false illusions of safety and
economy. This judgment was inimical to the
interests of all these groups.
Poisoned Power is a starkly realistic
book. It is also a hopeful one, for the
authors firmly believe that citizen action
can combat the nuclear power group's
carefully contrived propaganda campaign. To
help the citizen to navigate through the
murky and controversial areas of debate
Gofman and Tamplin provide an appendix
containing the most frequently raised
questions on the merits of nuclear power,
with clear, direct answers. Poisoned Power
shows that we can have the electric power we
need to maintain our high quality of
life. And we can do it without destroying
our environment through the introduction
of radioactive poisons that will last,
essentially, forever.
Finally, the authors make a revolutionary
proposal--an Adversary System of Scientific
Inquiry, which will open all new technologies
of national scope to serious, objective
scrutiny by qualified scientists. These men
would be specifically charged with exploring
each proposed development with an eye to
uncovering possible physical, social or
economic hazards. These points would then be
weighed against any advantages by the
scientific community and the lay public before
further development of the technology would
be permitted. The authors believe such a
system would long ago have postponed the
proliferation of nuclear power stations to
allow for detailed investigation into their
safety and efficiency compared with
alternate sources of power.
From the back cover of the 1971 edition :
THE AUTHORS:
Internationally known for their research on the effects of
radioactivity on the environment, and particularly on man,
John W. Gofman and Arthur R. Tamplin are research associates
at Lawrence Radiation Laboratory in Livermore, California.
Arthur
R. Tamplin is a graduate of
the University of California at Berkeley, with a B.A. in
biochemistry and a Ph.D. in biophysics. As a group leader
in the Biomedical Division at Lawrence, he has been
responsible for developing the ability to predict the
ultimate distribution within the biosphere -- particularly
the concentration in man -- of each radionuclide produced
in the explosion of a nuclear device. This program also is
concerned with the effects of its radiation on man. Previously
he was a research associate with Rand Corporation, working
on problems concerned with the space program.
John
W. Gofman has degrees from
the University of California. a Ph.D. in nuclear-physical
chemistry (at Berkeley) and an M.D. He is Professor
of Medical Physics at Berkeley.
Form
1963 to Sept. 1969, he was Associate Director of the Lawrence
Laboratory.
Dr. Gofman
is a co-discoverer of
U232, Pa232, U233,
Pa233; and of slow and fast neutron
fissionability of U233. He also is
co-inventor of the uranyl acetate and columbium oxide
processes for plutonium separation. He has taught in
the radioisotope and radiobiology fields for over 20
years, and has done research in radiochemistry,
macromolecules, lipoproteins, coronary heart disease,
arteriosclerosis, trace element determination, x-ray
spectroscopy, chromosomes and cancer, and radiation
hazards.
Co-editor
of Advances in Biological and Medical Physics, he
also has written about 130 articles, and has prepared
many additional reports. In addition, he is author,
with A.V. Nichols and E.V. Dobbin, of three books on
heart disease. He is a member of 10 scholarly and
professional societies.
Drs.
Gofman and Tamplin have worked together not only in
research but also as crusaders before governmental,
public and professional groups to make Americans aware
of the grave dangers of nuclear pollution.
From the back cover of the 1979 edition :
Here's what those who know have to say about Poisoned Power:
John Gofman and Arthur Tamplin have been major figures
in the battle against nuclear power since their pioneering
work on the dangers of radiation from nuclear power plants.
Their book, Poisoned Power, deserves re-reading in
the light of recent events at Three Mile Island. If the
nuclear juggernaut is stopped, a great deal of credit will
go to these dedicated and incorruptible scientists.
--Paul Ehrlich, author of The Population Bomb
The information on nuclear power and radiation so eloquently
and simply explained by Drs. Gofman and Tamplin in
Poisoned Power is of crucial importance to all
citizens. We all owe a debt of gratitude to these courageous
scientists who could have submitted to the Atomic Energy
Commission's pressure, but instead told the truth about
nuclear power.
--Ralph Nader, consumer advocate
Dr. Gofman and his colleague Arthur Tamplin have challenged
the over-optimistic approach of the AEC to radiation hazards
in a remarkable series of scientific analyses while they
were employed by the AEC. For this courageous and important
service to society, they were rewarded by losing their
funding.
--Barry Commoner, in his book, The Poverty of Power
Internationally known for their research on the effects of
radioactivity on the environment, and particularly on man,
John W. Gofman and Arthur R. Tamplin were research associates
at Lawrence Radiation Laboratory in Livermore, California,
until the Atomic Energy Commission cut off funding for
continuation of their research.
Arthur R. Tamplin is a graduate of the University of
California at Berkeley, with a B.A. in biochemistry and a
Ph.D. in biophysics. He is now a staff scientist for the
Natural Resources Defense Council.
John W. Gofman has a Ph.D. in nuclear-physical chemistry and
an M.D. from the University of California. He is Professor
Emeritus of Medical Physics at Berkeley and Chairman of the
Committee for Nuclear Responsibility.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
( Expanded ToC )
List Of Figures
image
|
|
link to location of image in text
|
figure 1
|
|
Vertical cross-section of a pressurized-water nuclear reactor
|
figure 2
|
|
Liquid Metal Fast Breeder/Pressurized Water Reactor diagrams
|
figure 3
|
|
A fission reaction
|
figure 4
|
|
rat exposed to single dose of beta rays
|
figure 5
|
|
small doses of x-ray exposure over 15 years to hand of physician
|
figure 6
|
|
2 cell cultures: left unexposed, right exposed to ionizing radiation
|
figure 7
|
|
human chromosomes diagrams, cell division to each daughter cell
|
figure 8
|
|
human chromosomes in cell damaged by gamma ray radiation
|
figure 9
|
|
Radiation Hazard graphic
|
figure 10
|
|
Nuclear Fuel Cycle
|
figure 10
|
|
(smaller, inlined version)
|
figure 11
|
|
electric power industry advertisement promoting increased consumption of electricity
|
figure 11
|
|
(smaller, inlined version) "Flameless electric heat is pure comfort...so fresh, so clean, so right for your family"
|
figure 12
|
|
AEC/electric power industry spend millions promoting the idea that atomic energy is safe and clean
|
figure 12
|
|
(smaller, inlined version) "Go play in the nuclear power park"
|
figure 13
|
|
Nuclear Power Plants in the United States as of December 31, 1978
|
figure 14
|
|
electric power lines/towers, `cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky'
|
figure 15
|
|
To Our Patients; Santa Cruz Physicians ad opposing power plant construction
|
figure 15
|
|
(smaller, inlined version)
|
|