last modified: 7 September 2001
|
rat haus reality press is deeply honored and greatful for the opportunity to mirror local copies of the following papers, speech transcripts, and other works by Dr. Mae-Wan Ho. Like Dr. John Gofman, she has unconditionally committed herself to champion, honor and serve life's needs. Like Laurens van der Post she values Carl Jung's contributions to seeing our selves and our modern world wholistically and thus to apprehend the formidable forces of light and dark that make us both what we are and what we can be. We collectively owe a debt of gratitude to those like Mae-Wan who employ their wisdom, intelligence, and creativity to make science once more accountable to life. Only in this way can we, as a species, successfully grow beyond our adolescent reductionist and mechanistic phase that promotes commercial gain as the paramount goal of scientific exploration of our world and universe.
In 1999, I co-founded the Institute of Science in Society (ISIS) of which I am Director. I-SIS is a not-for-profit organisation, promoting socially and ecologically accountable science and the integration of science in society. I-SIS also represent a group of scientists around the world (currently 364 from some 40 countries [457 scientists from 56 countries as of Sept 2001]) who have co-signed a World Scientists Statement and Open Letter to All Governments, calling for a moratorium on environmental releases of GMOs on grounds that they are unsafe, and to revoke and ban patents on life-forms and living processes, on grounds that they are unethical.
Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, 26 Oct 2000
Witness Statement at the Chardon LL
(a GM "line" [Aventis -- T25 Maize], approved for animal feed) Hearing in London. |
In an e-mail sent to dave, Mae-Wan emphasized the point:
We must actively connect the genetic engineering debate with holistic, ecological sciences. It is the most effective way to recapture the agenda from the corporations.
May others be as inspired and as expanded as we are being by taking inside the awareness and perceptions of Dr. Mae-Wan Ho.
Many remarkable individuals and local communities are indeed changing their
own lives and the world around them for the better. They all do so by learning
from nature and recognizing that it is the symbiotic, mutualistic
relationships which sustain ecosystems and make all life prosper, including
the human beings who are active, sensitive participants in the ecosystem as
a whole [44].
Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, Towards a New Ethic
of Science, 16 Mar 2000
|
If you want to stay informed on the GM debate why not subscribe to the Institute of Science in Society's free newsletter I-SIS news. All issues are available at www.i-sis.org.uk/isisnews.shtml, but by joining the I-SIS information list you can have new editions, and other press releases sent straight to you.
The following files are mirrored with permission
from
their sources
at the
Institute of Science in Society (ISIS)
website.
All works by Mae-Wan Ho with additional authors indicated where present.
ISIS Titles Listed Topically and
Alphabetically:
|
|
The debate on genetic engineering biotechnology is dogged by the artificial separation imposed between "pure" science and the issues it gives rise to. "Ethics" is deemed to be socially determined, and therefore negotiable, while the science is seen to be beyond reproach, as it is the "laws" of nature. The same goes for the distinction between "technology" -- the application of science -- from the science. Risk assessments are to do with the technology, leaving the science equally untouched. The technology can be bad for your health, but not the science. In this article, I shall show why science cannot be separated from moral values nor from the technology that shapes our society. In other words, bad science is unquestionably bad for one's health and well-being, and should be avoided at all costs. Science is, above all, fallible and negotiable, because we have the choice, to do or not to do. It should be negotiated for the public good. That is the only ethical position one can take with regard to science. Otherwise, we are in danger of turning science into the most fundamentalist of religions, that, working hand in hand with corporate interests, will surely usher in the brave new world.
--Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, The Unholy Alliance, 1997
|
Biotechnology / Genetic Engineering
Agriculture
- Terminator insects give wings to genome invaders, 19 Mar 2001
- The `Golden Rice' - An Exercise in How Not to Do Science, with Joe Cummins, 2000
Biomedical applications
- Radical Solutions Needed for Antibiotic Resistance, with Sam Burcher, 25 Jun 2001
- Gene Therapy Oversold by Scientists Who Disregard Risks, by Angela Ryan, 17 May 2001
- First GM Humans Already Created, with Joe Cummins, 2 May 2001
- Xenotransplantation - How Bad Science and Big Business
Put the World at Risk from Viral Pandemics, with Joe Cummins, 2000
- Unregulated Hazards - Naked and Free Nucleic Acids,
with Angela Ryan, Joe Cummins, & T.Traavik, Jan 2000
- Dr Arpad Pusztai Talks on Food for the 21st Century,
prepared by Angela Ryan, 7 May 1999
- BSE to GMOs - What Have We Learned? / Dr Harash Narang and BSE,
by Angela Ryan & Harash Narang
Biopatents
Conceptual Articles
- More on Terminator and Related Patents, by Joe Cummins, 12 Jul 2001
- Human Genome - The Biggest Sellout in Human History, 18 Oct 2000
- The Biotechnology Bubble, with Hartmut Meyer & Joe Cummins, May 1998
Ethics
- Why Clone At All?, 11 Mar 2001
- The Unnecessary Evil of Therapeutic Human Cloning, with Joe Cummins, 23 Jan 2001
- Xenotransplantation - How Bad Science and Big Business
Put the World at Risk from Viral Pandemics, with Joe Cummins, 2000
- Towards a New Ethic of Science, 16 Mar 2000
Legal Briefs and Legislation
- Witness Statement of Mae-Wan Ho, Chardon LL Public Hearing, 26 Oct 2000
Public Debates
- Chief Scientist Bob May Lambastes Human Genetics Panel,
by Nick Papadimitriou and Angela Ryan, 25 Apr 2001
- Taking Science Seriously in the GM Debate, 16 Apr 2001
- Can biotechnology help fight world hunger?, 29 Jun 2000
- GM Food Hazards and the Science War, 12/1/99
- Being Human: Science, Ethics and Our Rights
An ICA/Index Debate, by Angela Ryan
- No to GMO's - Civil Society vs Corporate Empire, 11 Sep 1999
Lectures
- Beyond Bad Science and Big Business, 10 Nov 2000
- Turning the Tide on the Brave New World, revised Apr 2001
Science and Government
- Best Practice in the Design of GM Crops,
with Joe Cummins & Jeremy Bartlett, 6 Dec 2000
- The Scientific Advice that FDA Ignored (A Compilation), by Angela Ryan
I am making a case for organicist science. It is not yet a conscious
movement but a Zeitgeist I personally embrace, so I really mean to
persuade you to do likewise by giving it a more tangible shape. The new
organicism, like the old, is dedicated to the knowledge of the organic
whole, hence, it does not recognize any discipline boundaries. It is to be
found between all disciplines. Ultimately, it is an unfragmented
knowledge system by which one lives. There is no escape clause allowing
one to plead knowledge `pure' or `objective', and hence having nothing to
do with life. As with the old organicism, the knowing being participates
in knowing as much as in living. Participation implies responsibility,
which is consistent with the truism that there can be no freedom without
responsibility, and conversely, no responsiblity without freedom. There is
no placing mind outside nature as Descartes has done, the knowing being is
wholeheartedly within nature: heart and mind, intellect and feeling
(Ho, 1994a). It
is non-dualist and holistic. In all those respects, its
affinities are with the participatory knowledge systems of traditional
indigenous cultures all over the world. . . .
--Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, The Biology of Free Will, 1996
|
New Science of the Organism
- Evolution, 1998
Public Lectures
- Thinking again of lifes miracle, 10 April 2000
- The Biology of Free Will, 1996
- Gaia and the Evolution of Coherence, 10 Aug 1993
Scientific Papers
Sustainable Agriculture
Interviews
All the elements for a science of the organism are there between the
disciplines, precisely as envisaged by the pioneer thinkers. I have put
some of the key elements together in my book,
The Rainbow and The Worm,
The Physics of Organisms, ...
which is patterned after Erwin Schrödinger's What is Life? It
attempts to explain organic wholeness and complexity based on contemporary
quantum physics and non-equilibrium thermodynamics. It gives new insights
into physiological regulation, bioenergetics and cell biology, many of
which were predicted by the pioneers. Also consistent with their vision,
the new science of the organism promises to restore all the qualities that
have been exorcised from life and nature, to reaffirm and extend our
intuitive, poetic, and even romantic notions of nature's unity. . . .
--Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, The Organic Revolution in Science
and Implications for Science and Spirituality, 2000 |
Science and Society
- The Human Genome - A Big White Elephant, 9 Jun 2001
- Public Subsidy of Failed Corporate Science, 10 Jun 2001
- Big Business = Bad Science?, 29 May 2001
- Towards a New Ethic of Science, 16 Mar 2000
- The New Thought Police - Suppressing Dissent in Science, with Jonathan Mathews, 16 Feb 2001
- The Organic Revolution in Science, 29 Oct 1999
- Use and Abuse of The Precautionary Principle, by Peter Saunders, 13 Jul 2000
- ISIS News #6, September 2000
- ISIS News #5, July 2000
- ISIS News #4, March 2000
- ISIS News #3, December 1999
Science and Commerce
- The `Golden Rice' - An Exercise in How Not to Do Science, with Joe Cummins, 2000
- No to GMO's - Civil Society vs Corporate Empire, 11Sep 1999
Science and Government
- Scientists Against the Brave New World, Jul 2000
World Scientists in US Congress and Special Biotechnology Forum
Science and Art
Sustainable Agriculture
Sustainable agriculture is predicated on a holistic, ecological
perspective anathema to reductionist mechanistic science. Mechanistic
science has been thoroughly discredited in the course of the 20th century.
Mechanical physics went first of all with relativity and quantum physics.
Biology was the last to go with the new genetics.
--Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, Taking Science Seriously in the GM Debate, 16 Apr 2000
|
ISIS Titles Listed Alphabetically and Topically:
|
To try to understand disease in terms of genes and protein interactions is worse than trying to understand how a machine works in terms of its nuts and bolts, simply because the parts of the organism, unlike those of a machine, are inseparably tangled up with one another. Mechanistic understanding in terms of interacting parts is extremely unlikely to lead to the design of better drugs. For that, we require knowledge of the design of the human organism. And no amount of information on genes and protein interactions will ever add up to the complex, entangled whole that is the organism.
--Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, Human Genome--The Biggest Sellout in Human History, 2000
|
Links to other works on the
Institute of Science in Society (ISIS) website:
World Scientists Statement
Open Letter from World Scientists to All Governments
- signed by 454 scientists from 56 countries, as of August 2001.
Concerning Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)
The scientists are extremely concerned about the hazards of GMOs to biodiversity, food safety, human and animal health, and demand a moratorium on environmental releases in accordance with the precautionary principle.
They are opposed to GM crops that will intensify corporate monopoly, exacerbate inequality and prevent the essential shift to sustainable agriculture that can provide food security and health around the world.
They call for a ban on patents of life-forms and living processes which threaten food security, sanction biopiracy of indigenous knowledge and genetic resources and violate basic human rights and dignity.
They want more support on research and development of non-corporate, sustainable agriculture that can benefit family farmers all over the world.
We, the undersigned scientists, call for the immediate suspension of all environmental releases of GM crops and products; for patents on life-forms and living processes to be revoked and banned; and for a comprehensive public enquiry into the future of agriculture and food security for all.
Works by Dr Mae-Wan Ho
- Biosafety and Biopatents on Life :
- Genetic Engineering Dream or Nightmare?
A Scientist Challenges the Science, (2nd edition) 1999- Natural versus artificial genetic engineering
- The End of Bad Science and Beginning Again with Life, 3/4/00
- New Science of the Organism :
- The Acupuncture System
and The Liquid Crystalline Collagen Fibres
of the Connective Tissues - Liquid Crystalline Meridians
with David P. Knight (in press)- The Rainbow And The Worm, The Physics of Organisms (2nd Edition), 1998
- Quantitative Image Analysis of Birefringent Biological Material
with John P. Bolton & David Knight, 1997- Organisms as Polyphasic Liquid Crystals, 1996
- Are Economic Systems Like Organisms?
- Science and Society :
Personal Qualifications listed at the top of
Report
on horizontal gene transfer
- Department of Public
Prosecution versus Gavin Harte and others, New Ross, Ireland,
Mae-Wan Ho, Reader in Biology at the Open University, B. Sc. (First Class) 1964, and Ph. D. 1967, H K University; more than 30 years in research and 25 years teaching experience; nearly 200 publications covering human biochemical genetics, molecular genetics, evolution, developmental biology, and biophysics. Awards include, Chan Kai Ming Prize for Biological Sciences (HK) 1964: Fellow of the National Genetics Foundation (USA) 1971-1974; Vida Sana Award (Spain) 1998; Guest of Honour in Women of the Year Luncheon & Assembly (UK) 1998. From 1994, Scientific Advisor to the Third World Network and other public interest organizations on biotechnology and biosafety. Debated issues in the United Nations, the World Bank, the European Parliament, in the UK, USA and many other countries all over the world. Author of many papers and reports for the public and for policy-makers, frequent broadcaster and public lecturer. Recent publications relevant to genetic engineering:
|