APPENDIX II
MORATORIUM ACTIVISTS
March, 1971
The California moratorium effort:
Contact:
|
The People's Lobby, Inc.
Attn: Mr. and Mrs. Ed Koupal
1524 N. Western Avenue
Hollywood, California 90027
Tel: (213) 461-3071
|
The People's Lobby has undertaken an anti-pollution initiative
for the 1972 ballot which includes pesticides, off-shore oil,
automobile emissions, and a 5-year moratorium on construction
of nuclear power plants in California (section # 16 of the
initiative).
The Minnesota moratorium effort:
Contacts:
|
Minnesota Environmental Control Citizens Assn. (MECCA)
Exchange Manor
26 E. Exchange St.
St. Paul, Minn. 55101
Tel: (612) 222-2998
|
or:
|
Russell Hatling
144 Melbourne Ave., S.E.
Minneapolis, Minn. 55414
|
State Senator Niclolas Coleman is introducing a bill to enact
a moratorium on new construction of nuclear plants in
Minnesota until such time as they are safe.
The Oregon moratorium effort:
Contacts:
|
Oregon Environmental Council
Attn: Larry Williams
1238 N.W. Glisan Street
Portland, Oregon 97209
|
or:
|
Citizens for Safe Power
Attn: Joan Reitz and Beulah Hand
4816½ S.E. Bybee
Portland, Oregon 97206
|
There are two bills under consideration in the Oregon state
senate (SB 51 and SB 218) which would prevent nuclear power
plant construction anywhere in the state for four or five
years. In addition, in May 1970, the citizens of Eugene, Oregon
voted in favor of a four-year nuclear moratorium in their area
by an initiative petition (Ballot Measure 52).
Contact:
|
Eugene Future Power Committee, Inc.
POB 5274
Eugene, Oregon 97405
Joseph A. Holaday, President
|
New York City moratorium effort:
Contacts:
|
Mrs. Ann Margotson
515 West 122nd St.
New York City 10027
|
or:
|
Hon. Theodore Weiss, chairman
Environmental Protection Committee
The City Council
City Hall
New York City 10007
|
On February 17, 1970, City Councilman Theodore Weiss and 27
additional members of the Council introduced a bill banning
nuclear reactors from the city. This was later amended to a
moratorium. No action has been voted yet.
International moratorium effort:
In November, 1970, a petition began circulating to mobilize
biological scientists against environmental degradation. One
provision of the petition says:
"Because the crisis is so pressing, we urge that the following
actions be taken even while research is going on. We do not
offer these as panaceas, but as holding actions to keep our
situation from deteriorating past the point of no
return: (1). A moratorium on technological innovations the
effects of which we can not foretell and which are not
essential to human survival. This would include . . . the
establishment of vast new nuclear power projects."
Contact:
|
The Fellowship of Reconciliation
Box 271
Nyack, New York
|
For additional information, write to: Committee for Nuclear
Responsibility, Suite 1100, 111 East 58th St., New York, N.Y. 10022
or:
|
Moratorium on Nuclear Power Plants
Environmental Action Bulletin
Emmaus, Pa. 18049
|
MORATORIUM PROPOSALS
(Below are descriptions as well as some excerpts from moratorium
proposals initiated in several states to illustrate the wording
and intent of such legislation on a state-wide level.)
THE COLEMAN BILL: A MORATORIUM ON NEW CONSTRUCTION OF NUCLEAR
PLANTS IN MINNESOTA UNTIL THEY ARE SAFE.
State
Senator Nicholas Coleman introduced a bill in the Minnesota
State Legislature to enact a moratorium on new construction of
nuclear plants in Minnesota until such time as they are
safe. Sen. Coleman has been explicit in his wish that "whenever
the power industry reaches the point of competence that there is
no exposure to the public from radioactive discharges, whether
that time is six months or a year, the industry should be allowed
to proceed on construction of new nuclear plants. But until this
point of competence is reached, the public has every right to
expect its state legislators to protect it from the known hazards
of radioactive discharges."
The
provisions of the Coleman bill define the period of the
moratorium as being:
PROVISION A:
"When there is no public exposure to radioactive
effluents or waste discharges, whether accidental or intentional,
from the operation of such nuclear plants."
PROVISION B:
"When the radioactive wastes from such nuclear
plants can be contained and stored with no possibility of
accidental or intentional leakage or discharge into the global
environment or surrounding area of said storage site."
PROVISION C:
"When obsolete and non-operable nuclear power
plants are decontaminated, disassembled and removed, including
mechanical removal of radioactive soil, contaminated surfaces,
and shielding material."
PROVISION D:
"When such person (including the directors of any
corporation) can provide private insurance to cover total costs
and liability resulting from the nuclear power plant's loss of
coolant and major meltdown of the fuel rods within the reactor
core."
OREGON: SENATE BILL 218
Oregon Legislative Assembly-1971 Regular Session (Sponsored by
Committee on Environmental Affairs at the request of the Oregon
Environmental Council.)
Summary: Prohibits construction or operation of thermal power
plants until July 1, 1975. Requires Environmental Quality
Commission to conduct study of ecological and other aspects of
thermal power plants and report back to legislature by February
1, 1973. Provides penalties.
("`Thermal
power plant' means any facility, including but not
limited to electrical generation plants, using nuclear energy.")
|