back to radioactivity | radiation | rat haus | Index | Search | tree

This article is mirrored from its source at:

Some US spent-fuel storage sites are overloaded
By Jonathan Fahey
Associated Press
printed in The Boston Globe
March 24, 2011


NEW YORK -- The nuclear crisis in Japan has laid bare an ever-growing problem for the United States -- the enormous amounts of still-hot radioactive waste accumulating at commercial nuclear reactors in more than 30 states.

The United States has 71,862 tons of the waste, according to state-by-state numbers obtained by The Associated Press. But the nation has no place to permanently store the material, which stays dangerous for tens of thousands of years.

Plans to store nuclear waste at Nevada’s Yucca Mountain have been abandoned, but even if a facility had been built there, America already has more waste than it could have handled.

Three-quarters of the waste sits in water-filled cooling pools like those at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear complex in Japan, outside the thick concrete-and-steel barriers meant to guard against a radioactive release from a nuclear reactor.

Spent fuel at Daiichi overheated, possibly melting fuel-rod casings and spewing radiation into the air, after Japan’s tsunami knocked out power to cooling systems at the plant.

The rest of the spent fuel from commercial US reactors has been put into dry cask storage, but regulators envision those as a solution for only about a century.

The US nuclear industry says the waste is being stored safely at power-plant sites, though it has long pushed for a long-term storage facility. Meanwhile, the industry’s collective pile of waste is growing by about 2,200 tons a year; analysts say some of the pools in the United States contain four times the amount of spent fuel that they were designed to handle.

The Nuclear Energy Institute, an industry and lobbying group that maintains data submitted voluntarily by nuclear power plants, provided a summary but not the amount of spent fuel at individual power plants.

While the US Department of Energy previously reported figures on overall spent fuel storage, it no longer has updated information available. A spokesman for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which oversees nuclear power plant safety, said the agency was still searching for a compilation of spent fuel data.

The United States has 104 operating nuclear reactors, situated on 65 sites in 31 states. There are another 15 permanently shut reactors that also house spent fuel.

Four states have spent fuel even though they do not have operating commercial plants. Reactors in Colorado, Oregon, and Maine are permanently shut; spent fuel from all three is stored in dry casks. Idaho never had a commercial reactor, but waste from the 1979 Three Mile Island accident in Pennsylvania is being stored at a federal facility there.

Illinois has 9,301 tons of spent nuclear fuel at its power plants, the most of any state, industry figures show. Next are Pennsylvania with 6,446 tons; 4,290 in South Carolina, and roughly 3,780 tons each for New York and North Carolina.

Spent nuclear fuel is about 95 percent uranium. About 1 percent includes other heavy elements such as curium, americium, and plutonium-239, known as fuel for nuclear weapons. How dangerous these elements are depends on how easily they can find their way into the body. Plutonium and uranium are heavy and do not spread through the air well, but there is a concern that plutonium could leach into water supplies over time.

Meanwhile, the NRC has launched a two-step review of US nuclear power plants in light of the nuclear crisis in Japan.

The commission voted yesterday to set up a task force, made up of senior staff and former NRC experts, that will conduct short-term and long-term analyses of lessons learned from Japan. The reports also will address how lessons can be applied to the 104 US nuclear reactors.

Material from the Associated Press was used in this report.

Copyright © 2011 Globe Newspaper Company
Reprinted for Fair Use Only.

This article is mirrored from its source at:

The single greatest security vulnerability in the U.S.
-- high-level radioactive waste

By Beyond Nuclear
1 April 2011

CNN Money quotes Beyond Nuclear's radioactive waste watchdog, Kevin Kamps, on the need to transfer high-level radioactive waste from dangerously overfilled storage pools into hardened on-site storage in order to prevent catastrophic radioactive infernos if cooling water is lost through natural disaster, accident, or attack.

The Statement of Principles for Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at Reactors, first unveiled by Michele Boyd (then at Public Citizen, now at Physicians for Social Responsibility) at a congressional hearing in September 2006, now has nearly 200 endorsing environmental organizations signed on.

The phrase "hardened on-site storage," or HOSS, was first coined by Dr. Arjun Makhijani of Institute for Energy and Environmental Research (IEER) in April, 2002 at a national grassroots gathering on the risks of high-level radioactive waste, organized by Citizens Awareness Network, held at Wesleyan College in Connecticut.

Dr. Gordon Thompson provided more in depth analysis on what HOSS would require in his Jan. 2003 report "Robust Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel: A Neglected Issue of Homeland Security," also commissioned by CAN.

Despite repeated calls over many years by environmental coalitions, to both the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the U.S. Congress, to empty vulnerable storage pools (especially the General Electric Boiling Water Reactors of the Mark 1 design, the same as are currently melting down, with pool fires, at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan) by transferring high-level radioactive wastes into HOSS, the warnings have fallen on deaf ears, and no action has been taken, nearly a decade after the 9/11 attacks.

Copyright © 2011
Reprinted for Fair Use Only.

back to radioactivity | radiation | rat haus | Index | Search | tree