|
If we do not abolish nuclear weapons
they will surely abolish us. |
Comparing “Conventional” Explosives
to Nuclear Weapons
500 Pounds of High Explosive
What a small anti-ship missile (ASM) with a small high explosive
warhead (HE)
will do to an unarmored "modern" surface ship
2000 Pounds of High Explosive
(start at 0:17)
The largest conventional bomb the US arsenal has is 30,000 pounds of explosive, or 30 tons. The largest "conventional" chemical high explosive bomb is 1,000 times less powerful than a "small" atomic bomb. Why is it called "Conventional"? Why is it conventional to drop bombs on people and cities? World War II saw the beginning of mass bombing raids. It was considered a war crime in 1937 when the NAZIs bombed Guernica in the Spanish Civil War. By 1945 the US ran firebombing raids in Japan. We firebombed 67 major Japanese cities, killing 500,000 people, mostly civilians, because the soldiers were at war. That was before Hiroshima. Firebombing Tokyo killed 100,000 people.
Hiroshima
First Nuclear Weapon Used To Kill People The single atomic bomb that destroyed the Japanese city of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945 had an explosive power of roughly 15,000 tons of TNT or 15 kilitons. This is a picture of Hiroshima before the atomic bomb was detonated: From the Hiroshima Peace Museum website: “One second after detonation, the fireball was 280 meters in diameter. The temperature at the center was over one million degrees centigrade. The heat emitted by that fireball raised surface temperatures near the hypocenter to 3,000 to 4,000 degrees centigrade. Five hundred meters from the hypocenter, the blast pressure was 19 tons per square meter. The maximum wind speed was 440 meters per second. This blast simply crushed all wooden buildings within a radius of two kilometers.” It is shocking to see what the atomic bomb did to Hiroshima. More than 4 square miles of the city were utterly destroyed, transforming it into a barren wasteland.
Comparing Atomic Bombs to
Strategic Nuclear Weapons Atomic bombs were the first nuclear weapons to be invented. Atomic bombs are much less powerful than the hydrogen bombs, or thermonuclear weapons, which were invented in the 1950s. These “super-bombs” often had explosive powers one thousand times greater than atomic bombs. The above image compares the relative size of the mushroom cloud produced by an atomic bomb to a mushroom cloud produced a thermonuclear weapon that had an explosive power of 15 million tons of TNT or 15 megatons, which was tested by the United States in 1954. Today, thermonuclear bombs are called “strategic nuclear weapons,” and they generally have an explosive power ranging from 100,000 tons or 100 kilotons to more than 1 million tons or 1 megaton of TNT. Two films:
Nuclear Weapons: A Time-Lapse History
Over 2,000 atomic bombs have been detonated worldwide since 1945.
This is a brief timeline showing every blast on a world map up until 1998. Notice the captions at 0:20 and 0:29 refer to both Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings as being “military combat”. While this echos “official history” it does not reflect reality unless we believe that murdering women, children, and older people constitutes military combat. Consider this observation by Admiral William Leahy, President Truman’s Chief of Staff: the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender.... in being the first to use it, we...adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children.
Nuclear Bomb Test Compilation HD
(Due to time constraints we watched up to 1:35.) Let’s examine what the Firestorm would encompass from the detonation of an 800 megaton strategic nuclear weapon over Fresno. The firestorm produced by a strategic nuclear weapon is vastly larger than that produced by an atomic bomb. This graphic illustrates the most likely size of a fire zone, created by an 800 kiloton strategic nuclear warhead. The graphic shows it being detonated above New York City. Once the US and Soviet Union (Russia plus a number of affiliated states) started stockpiling multi-megaton H-bombs, a single bomber could carry more explosive power than all the bombs and explosives detonated during the 5 years of World War II. By 1986, the US and USSR built a total of 60,000-70,000 nuclear weapons.
A War with Nuclear Weapons =
Nuclear Winter & Extinction of Life on Earth Today Russia and the U.S. together possess about 15,000, or 93%, of the 16,400 nuclear weapons in the global nuclear arsenal. Russia has about 8,000 intact nuclear weapons and the US has about 7,300. France comes next with about 300 and the remaining 6 nuclear states have fewer than that. What's new in this work? A nuclear war between any nuclear states using much less that 1 percent of the current nuclear arsenal will produce climate change unprecedented in recorded human history. Some of the world’s leading climatologists did a simulation of what would happen if the US and Russia had a nuclear war. There would be so much smoke it would and most of it would go up into the stratosphere, the region above where there is weather so there wouldn’t be any rain to wash it out and it would last for more than a decade, and it would cover the whole world.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Robock, Alan, Luke Oman, and Georgiy L. Stenchikov, 2007b:
Nuclear winter revisited with
a modern climate model and current nuclear arsenals: Still
catastrophic consequences. J. Geophys. Res., 112,
D13107, doi:2006JD008235.]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What To Do
What can we do about this? Mark Twain said, “Denial ain’t just a river in Egypt.” It feels good psychologically to pretend you didn’t hear what I just said and go home and pretend it doesn’t exist. And most of the world does that. Helen Caldicott, the physician and anti nuclear campaigner calls that psychic numbing. But another action is to try and do something about it to get rid of the weapons. We’ve already banned biological weapons in the world, chemical weapons, land minds, and cluster munitions. But the worst of all weapons of mass destruction—nuclear weapons—have not been banned. The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, is working to actually ban nuclear weapons. You can join this global organization, and spread the word on social media about how they are working to negotiate a treaty banning nuclear weapons with the majority of the family of nations that do NOT have nuclear weapons and has made it a legal undertaking never to acquire them. I encourage you to read and study a penetrating 2-page summary by Wildfire concerning the What, Why, How, Where, Who, & When of “A treaty banning nuclear weapons”. There are many more elements to explore to inform and inspire in the What To Do section as well as other relevant information presented in the Dynamics of Possible Nuclear Extinction Symposium that Dr. Helen Caldicott convened at the New York Academy of Medicine earlier this year. The following pursuits will promote the work of our single global civil society to stigmatize, prohibit, and eliminate nuclear weapons:
Finally, be clear that educating ourselves and others serves Life’s needs here on Earth and gives significance and purpose to our days. Learning more about implementing a treaty banning nuclear weapons increases consciousness of the overriding necessity to do so. The following work of art, produced by Chris Jordan photographic arts, visualizes “the enormous power of humanity’s collective will.” E Pluribus Unum is a striking indicator—as of 5 years ago—of how many people on Earth are engaged in engendering a world of inclusion where everyone and everything belongs. You must visit the page itself to apprehend the magnitude of what is being represented by zooming out from within this visualization.
To be sure, there are a wealth of disturbing facts visualized by Jordan’s portfolio of works. Still, as with all eternal opposites, forever joined like two sides of a coin, there is also the life-affirming expression of the “enormous power of humanity’s collective will” to understand and be informed by. This power is what we must ALL engage, direct, and focus, to close the book on the possibility of extinction by nuclear weapons, for the sake of the children, all we share Earth with, and all that is yet to be born and live out lives here long, long, long after we are gone. Please share this information with everyone you know including via your social networking systems. Thank you. |